Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Policy & Politics

Utility-Scale Solar on BLM Desert Lands Will Generate Substantial Income for Taxpayers

Desert lands in solar-rich Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah will not just supply our nation with abundant, clean, safe, fuel-free solar power – but will also generate very good financial returns for the benefit of the public good nationwide, under a new fee schedule the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) introduced last month for solar developers.

[social_buttons]

Energy Prospects reports that a megawatt-capacity fee (based on the productivity of the solar  technologies chosen) and annual rents per acre will be charged by the BLM for the next 50 years or more, generating not just abundant clean sunshine-powered energy, but also a very substantial annual income from desert lands.

The base rents range from just under $16 an acre to more than $300 an acre, payable annually. It takes thousands of acres to make solar power, so these will really add up. The 200 applications currently awaiting approvals on BLM land range from 5,000 acre projects up to ones that are up to 32,000 acres in size.

One 4,000 acre solar installation in Clark County, supplying Las Vegas, would bring in annual rent of $753,360. The 1,000 MW Solar Millennium parabolic-trough solar thermal project in Blythe, near Los Angeles (if it can ever get through the interminable elaborate environmental reviews!) would pay $9.5 million every year in both per-MW fees and rents.

The most expensive land for the base rent is closer to big cities in RES states, and the most expensive MW fees are for those solar technologies that incorporate night-time storage. As we add more renewables, energy storage is becoming a requirement in some states, like California. With that double whammy of included storage, and near Los Angeles – Solar Millennium will pay a premium. Each acre rented in Riverside County, near Los Angeles and Arizona’s Yuma County, (which could supply San Diego, LA or even Tucson) would rent at $314 per year. Desert land in far more isolated rural spots, some that lack freeway access, or available transmission, have lower rents. The lowest rents, $16 an acre, are in isolated Pima County, AZ, and Luna and Hidalgo County NM, and Mineral County, NV.

Then, in addition to the base rent, there will also be megawatt-capacity fees that vary depending on the relative productivity of different solar technologies. Concentrating solar thermal with three hours or more of night time storage would pay the most at $7,884 per MW annually. PV would pay the least ($5,256) and no-storage solar thermal would pay $6,570 for every megawatt annually.

PV generally takes the most space of the various technologies, as much as 20 acres per megawatt, but this varies. For example OptiSolar has planned 300 MW on 6,000 acres in Maricopa County, AZ, and another that can produce 500 MW on the same size space in Gila Bend, AZ. Concentrating solar thermal takes the least space, about 10 acres per megawatt, and it varies too. One of two planned 2,000 MW concentrating solar power trough projects from Iberdrola in Arizona will use 32,000 acres on each side of US 95. Their identical sized other one, south of 1-10 will take only 26,000 acres.

But since since solar uses lots of acres, the income will be enormous. The BLM has received more than 200 right-of-way applications for solar projects on BLM land in Southwestern states. And, because of the per megawatt fees, the income will increase as time goes on as efficient technologies are plugged in to replace the ones we initially build.

Susan Kraemer @Twitter

Image: Scott Braut

 
 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

New Podcast: Cruise Talks Autonomous Driving Tech, Regulations, & Auto Design

New Podcast: Battery Mineral Mining Policies & Regional Trends

Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.

Comments

#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.

 

Support our work today!

Advertisement

Power CleanTechnica: $3/Month

Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports

Advertisement

EV Sales Charts, Graphs, & Stats

Advertisement

Our Electric Car Driver Report

30 Electric Car Benefits

Tesla Model 3 Video

Renewable Energy 101 In Depth

solar power facts

Tesla News

EV Reviews

Home Efficiency

You May Also Like

Autonomous Vehicles

In this episode of our CleanTech Talk podcast interview series, CleanTechnica CEO Zach Shahan sits down with Rob Grant, Senior Vice President of Government...

Clean Power

California has more solar power installed than any other state — by far. It is also first in terms of percentage of the state’s...

Batteries

Back in September 2020, Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company (GREC) acquired the Rawhide Prairie Solar Storage project in Larimer County, Colorado. Solar Power World reports...

Cars

The Phoenix, Arizona metro area seems like it’s starting to become an EV production and maintenance hot spot. With Lucid Motors setting up a...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.