Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



Fannie and Freddie Inadvertently Shut Down PACE Solar Funding (and How to Make Them Stakeholders; to End this Impasse)

Grist is reporting that the Obama administration has tried and failed to stop Fannie and Freddie from putting up a roadblock to low-cost clean energy financing through PACE programs. Here is my suggestion to make Fannie and Freddie stakeholders, to make PACE a win-win-win-win.

The administration had invested $100 million in PACE program funding, in which municipal local governments can finance long term investments in solar roofs in their communities, by fronting that money; backed by private investment bonds, to just those individual homeowners who choose to put solar on their roofs, and then paying it back with a 25 year property tax assessment on that homeowner’s property, to pay back the private bonds, to pay back the Feds.

It is a pretty safe bet, and a good investment in clean energy which costs every stakeholder nothing in the long run, as it replaces routine energy bills that would have been paid to a utility otherwise.

Each time the house is sold over that 25 year PACE loan, the monthly solar bill is assumed by the new owners, and because the solar roof reduces or eliminates the electric bill, the new owners pay the same or less than they would have for electricity,  if they had stayed with their utility.

This is a good deal for sellers and buyers of homes, as lower ongoing utility costs means more money in pockets. It is a good deal for municipalities, because more money in pockets means more money is available to be spent locally. And it is a good deal for the housing market as houses that save you money are an attractive proposition, leading to more sales of these kinds of houses. With lower monthly costs more homeowners are able to afford homes, putting the housing market on a more stable footing.

But Fannie and Freddie appear to be being penny wise/pound foolish in over-reacting to the mortgage crisis.

It appears that officials at Fannie and Freddie do not understand that even if borrowers do default on their mortgages, they’re only responsible for the delinquent payments, not the entire assessed amount going into the future. The new buyers will make payments on the future bills. Delinquent amounts would typically amount to less than $1,000 for about a year of payments on a typical solar installation.

PACE programs already have elaborate safeguards against mortgage default built in. You will likely not get financing through PACE if your mortgage has been paid late, let alone if you are anything close to being underwater or to default in your mortgage.

In most cases, financing may not exceed some low percent of the total assessed value of the property, and even in the most extreme cases, it is difficult to image a scenario where it could exceed a small percent of the total property value; because most homes can be supplied with their energy needs for under ten percent of their value. A shack just cannot support that many solar panels.

Maybe Fannie or Freddie should be eligible for SRECs or carbon credits on all that free solar juice that empty homes would pump out onto the grid, undiluted by usage inside, any time that the house stands empty, between homeowners? Then every stakeholder continues to benefit from this great idea, no matter what happens.

Image: Flikr user mijmonty

Source: Grist

Susan Kraemer @Twitter

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Cap And Trade

For the last forty-odd years, the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, has been a mainstay of the conservative movement and major force in...

Clean Power

Earlier this spring, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance released its 2018 Community Power State Scorecard, revealing the the best and worst states for local...

Clean Power

As Kirsten Grind's reporting on Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) in the Wall Street Journal expanded, the mortgage banking lobby's anti-PACE talking points were...

Clean Power

Originally published at Each year, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance provides a score for each state’s energy policies based on how they help...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.