Researchers at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory released a new study on the bill savings received by residential customers with solar photovoltaic (PV) power systems, under the net metering rates currently offered by California’s two largest electric utilities. The report focuses on California, as it is the largest PV market in the United States.
The study shows that the bill savings per kilowatt-hour (kWh) generated by a PV system varies by a factor of 4 to 5 for residential customers of Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) within the study sample, and by a factor 2 to 3 for Southern California Edison (SCE) residential customers in the sample.
Net metering is a billing arrangement that allows customers with PV systems installed on-site to offset their monthly consumption with PV generation, whether or not the demand for power coincides when their systems are generating power. In conjunction with other policy support mechanisms, net metering has been instrumental in jump-starting the market for distributed PV in California and elsewhere in the U.S. However, alternative compensation methods are under consideration in some jurisdictions.
“One purpose of this study,” says report co-author Ryan Wiser with Berkeley Lab’s Environmental Energy Technologies Division, “is to help policymakers and others that seek to support the development of residential distributed PV in California understand the bill savings benefits of PV under net metering, and how those savings compare to other possible compensation mechanisms.” The study acknowledges that this is only one issue that policymakers must consider in developing policies related to distributed PV, and thus for example the report does not attempt to provide a comprehensive cost-effectiveness evaluation of net metering policies or to evaluate the cost of net metering to utility ratepayers who do not install PV.
The study is based on a sample of over 200 residential customers located in the service territories of PG&E and SCE. Depending on the size of the PV system, the median PG&E customer in the sample is found to receive bill savings of $0.19 to $0.25 per kWh generated by the PV system, and the median SCE customers receives bill savings of $0.19 to $0.24 per kWh. However, many customers receive bill savings that are substantially lower or higher than these figures.
According to the report, variation in the value of bill savings across customers is primarily the result of the particular residential retail electricity rate structures offered by the two utilities. As report co-author Galen Barbose explains, “The residential rates currently offered by PG&E and SCE have inclining usage tiers whereby customers that consume more energy each month pay a higher price. Consequently, high-usage residential customers receive relatively high-value bill savings from net metered PV systems.” This is particularly true for PG&E customers; among the highest-usage PG&E customers in the study’s sample, the bill saving value ranges from $0.31 to $0.49 per kWh.
The inclining price structure of PG&E’s and SCE’s residential electricity tariffs is much more pronounced than residential rates offered by other utilities. The degree of variation in bill savings value observed among the customers included in Berkeley Lab’s analysis is therefore not necessarily representative of other utilities and states, but it nonetheless does demonstrate the sensitivity of bill savings from net metered PV to the underlying rate structure. Bill Savings under Certain Alternatives to Net Metering Would Be Lower
The study also compares the bill savings that residential customers with PV receive under net metering to the bill savings that they might receive under several hypothetical alternative compensation mechanisms.
“In general, these comparisons show that net metering provides greater bill savings – in some cases, by a significant amount,” says Naïm Darghouth, the lead author of the report.
One of the alternatives examined is a feed-in tariff under which all PV generation is compensated at prices based on California’s Market Price Referent (MPR) – a price established by the California Public Utilities Commission that is intended to represent the long-run market price of electricity. The value of bill savings received under such an MPR-based feed-in tariff ranges from $0.12 to $0.13 per kWh for most customers. Depending on the PV system size, this equates to a 40 to 54 percent reduction in bill savings relative to net metering for the median PG&E customer in the study sample, and a 32 to 45 percent reduction for the median SCE customer. For high-usage customers, who receive the greatest bill savings under net metering, the reduction in bill savings under the MPR-based feed-in tariff would be substantially greater than these median values.
Another potential alternative compensation mechanism to net metering would allow customers to offset up to 100 percent of their consumption within each hour, but any hourly excess PV generation would be compensated at MPR-based prices, rather than being credited against consumption in other hours. Under this payment system, customers are found to generally experience a reduction in bill savings relative to net metering, but the difference is significantly less than under the full MPR-based feed-in tariff. Depending on PV system size, the median PG&E customer would see a 6 to 12 percent reduction in bill savings, and the median SCE customer would see a 6 to 10 percent reduction.
The report “The Impact of Rate Design and Net Metering on the Bill Savings from Distributed PV for Residential Customers in California,” by Naïm Darghouth, Galen Barbose, and Ryan Wiser may be downloaded here. The research was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Solar Energy Technologies Program) and the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division).
Article by David Ferris appearing courtesy Matter Network.
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Electrifying Industrial Heat for Steel, Cement, & More
I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...