Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Energy Efficiency

GAO Sting Finds EnergyStar® Program in Need of Independent Review; Overhaul Imminent

While much of the EnergyStar® program is sound, and has led to real quantifiable energy savings over time, over the last four years,  alarm bells have been sounding on the increasingly lax certification process. Just how lax?


A gasoline-powered alarm clock the size of a microwave was one of the more ridiculous items able to get an automated label in a year-long undercover sting operation by the General Accounting Office.

Alarms had been sounding for the last 4 years, leading up to a year long investigation that uncovered the flawed certification process.  So this month, the EPA and the DOE announced that it will begin a long overdue overhaul of certification processes to get the EnergyStar® program back on track.

For the first time, all products seeking the EnergyStar® label will be tested in approved labs and require manufacturers to participate in an ongoing verification testing program to will ensure continued compliance.

The problem had been developing for years. By 2006 a Federal court required that the DOE update and tighten misleading EnergyStar® ratings, ruling in favor of 14 states with complaints about lax ratings for dishwashers, air conditioners, heaters, furnaces and clothes dryers, among other appliances.

Consumer Reports noted in October 2008 that there were still problems with the label including lax qualifying standards, federal testing procedures that were outpaced by current technology, and reliance on industry self-policing. In December of 2008, an audit by the EPA Office of the Inspector General found that claims regarding greenhouse gas reductions were inaccurate and based on faulty data.

So early in 2009, Senator Susan Collins (R- ME) the ranking member of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs asked the GAO to test the product certification process, to ensure that it does indeed meet real efficiency requirements.

Beginning in June, the GAO ran a 12 month test. The just completed year-long test has indeed conclusively determined that manufacturers could obtain EnergyStar® partnership and product certification even for products not meeting the supposed efficiency requirements.

The GAO found that companies can easily submit fictitious energy-efficiency claims in order to obtain qualification for a broad range of consumer products.

“Based on our investigative results, we found that the current process for becoming an EnergyStar partner and certifying specific products as EnergyStar compliant provides little assurance that products with the EnergyStar label are some of the most efficient on the market. Control weaknesses associated with the general lack of upfront validation of manufacturer self reported data allowed all of our bogus firms to become EnergyStar partners, and allowed most of our products to be certified as Energy Star compliant.”

The program has primarily been a self-certification program relying on corporate honesty and industry self-policing to protect the integrity of the energy efficiency label. But now it appears that it is time to put in place a rigorous certification process based on independent testing.

Especially now, as the comparable new HomeStar program advances through congress, the need to restore the integrity of the original program that it would be based on becomes even more urgent. The self-policing aspect of the first program clearly does not provide the checks and balances needed. Kudos to a Republican ranking member for initiating such a review.

Image: The White House at Flikr

More Cleantechnica from Susan Kraemer: Journalists on Twitter

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Air Quality

The comprehensive $370 billion climate and clean energy package inclusion with the IRA is beginning with grant applications for states, tribes, and territories

Air Quality

Lately, I have been writing a lot about cumulative impacts from environmental hazards. Meanwhile, the Union of Concern Scientists just published an important report...

Climate Change

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Center for Biological Diversity and Green Latinos placed a full-page ad in The New York Times today blasting automaker doublespeak...

Clean Transport

Landmark Blueprint Will Advance the President’s Clean Transportation Agenda, Slashing Consumer Costs, Improving Public Health, and Increasing the Nation’s Energy Security 

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.