Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Fossil Fuels

South Dakota Legislature Kneecapping State's Wind Potential

South Dakota’s potential for utility-scale wind projects could be seriously curtailed by three bills now in the House that reduce the attractiveness of investment in a permanent, safe and clean energy source that could bring billions in much needed revenue to the state.

Like cutting itself off at the knees to save on shoe leather, the Republican-held legislature is considering three pieces of very short sighted legislation that cut off the few tax breaks that wind investment had.

Senate Bill 123 would remove all incentives for large capital improvement projects.

Senate Bill 195 would eliminate any refunds on projects that cost more than $40 million.

House Bill 1060 heard yesterday would cut tax refunds for large commercial projects.

Like all new power stations, wind projects are “large capital improvement projects”, “cost more than $40 million” and are “large commercial projects”. The shortsighted laws curtail wind power.

“When you’re talking investments in wind, you’re talking about heavy, capital-intensive projects. A cheap project for us is $300 million.” says Steve Wegman executive director of the South Dakota Wind Energy Association.”We have a huge problem coming down the pike, and we need consistent public policy.”

“This business will just move across the borders, into Minnesota, into Iowa, into North Dakota. That’s not a threat, it’s just dollars and sense. It’s time to scrap these bills and let’s get everybody to the table and talk tax policy.”

Bait and Switch

The proposed ruling by the legislature would retroactively affect projects that had already been financed, approved and placed in line to be interconnected to the grid, under the the existing tax laws, so this legislation would be profoundly unethical.

If the legislature passes these laws, NextEra and partner Basin Electric Power Cooperative will likely relocate a planned $350 million 151.5 MW PrairieWinds SD1 farm with its 101 1.5 MW wind turbines, collector substation and 13 miles of new transmission line, that had been approved and planned for South Dakota assuming the existing tax breaks.

To date, only 313 MW of wind is installed in South Dakota, or about the size of an average coal power plant.

No Wind Incentives Remain

The state has only a Renewable Energy “Objective” of 10% by 2015 (includes Solar Thermal Electric, Photovoltaics, Landfill Gas, Wind, Biomass, Hydroelectric, Geothermal Electric, Municipal Solid Waste, Hydrogen, Electricity Produced from Waste Heat and Anaerobic Digestion).

Unlike a Renewable Energy Standard, there are no penalties for non-achievement of an “objective”, so the invisible hand of the market decides the energy mix for the state, and has decided to keep its ancient coal power plants, rather than invest in wind. (However, this does include electricity from waste heat, which might interest coal powered utilities  (which produce the vast majority of South Dakota’s electricity) in cutting the carbon output of their coal plants by doubling their output (most operate at only 35% efficiency).

Despite being the 5th windiest state, South Dakota lags notably at 20th in wind installation. Its potential is estimated at 3,411,690 gigawatt hours by the NREL. The long term revenue to the state of wind power would far outweigh any introductory tax incentives.

The likely beneficiary of the shortsighted policy will be its own neighbor Iowa, that produces 15% of its power from wind (to meet its Renewable Energy Standard) while being only the 7th windiest state.  Iowa is 2nd in wind production, right behind Texas, with 3,670 megawatts.

Image: Dave Clark

Source: Ecoseed

More from Susan Kraemer: Journalists on Twitter

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like


South Dakota's renewable energy resources are quickly expanding beyond hydropower, with wind as frontrunner and solar bringing up the rear.

Clean Power

In a brilliant case of epic timing, MISO announced a new transmission line plan for more renewable energy in the US midsection earlier this...

Clean Power

2020 sees record for land-based wind generation, 24% increase in pipeline of offshore wind energy — laying the foundation for rapid growth in years...

Clean Power

ENGIE has more power capacity installed globally than any other country. In recent years, it has made a strong shift to renewable energy. In...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.