Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Policy & Politics

Surprise, Surprise, US Political System is Biased Against Green Laws!

Well, telling us something we should have learned in high school, a new study by researchers from the University of California shows why it is so difficult for the US to move forward on critical environmental issues.

[social_buttons]

The basics of it is that there is a severe misrepresentation of rural interests in the US political system. When you get into the details, you see how unbalanced this actually is and how this results in the US being an environmental laggard in the global community.

Due to the fact that every state gets two senators, California, for example, has the same influence in the Senate as each of the 21 least populated and generally rural states despite having approximately the same number of people as all of those states combined.

Put in other terms, Wyoming has 2 senators per million voters and California has 0.06 senators per million voters.

The result of this, for various reasons, is weak environmental action on critical issues.

“The study argues that rural voters tend to be more opposed to environmental legislation, as they are more dependent on private vehicles for transportation and must travel longer distances for professional and personal purposes, while the observable externalities of gasoline consumption, such as local air pollution and traffic congestion affect them less,” Tom Young of Business Green reports.

As a result of this unbalanced representation in the political system, the US is far behind on raising fuel taxes and addressing climate change.

“In many of these cases, this institutional variation is the result of antiquated and idiosyncratic historical choices,” the report says. “But the evidence points to an unintended consequence in the realm of environmental policy.”

In the end, rural concern led by efforts like the American Farm Bureau’s “Don’t CAP Our Future” campaign against cap and trade legislation, unbalanced in the US political system, stunts needed societal improvements to address climate change and other environmental issues and to create more jobs in the US. How to address this problem is the question at hand now.

Merging states, changing the representation system, or reducing the power of the Senate are all potential solutions to this problem, in theory, but highly unlikely to occur. So, for now, it seems that if we are going to address environmental issues in an appropriate way, we need to look at ways to engage these rural voters and their representatives in a positive manner on the pressing environmental issues of the day. Any suggestions?

Related Stories:

1) Getting Personal — Iraq Veterans & Victims of “Mountain Range Removal” Speak Up [VIDEOS]

2) European Countries Moving Forward on Climate Change Legislation

3) Social Media Day of Action on Mountaintop Removal

Image Credit: Zachary Shahan

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

Courtesy of the Environmental Working Group SAN FRANCISCO — Fearing voter backlash, California regulators may hold off issuing their proposed decision on a utility...

Buildings

Last week, California became the first state in the United States to commit to ending the sale of polluting fossil fuel appliances — specifically,...

Clean Transport

California takes its Advanced Clean Truck rules to the next level.

Cars

Electric cars are the subject of political action in New York State and Georgia as leaders address the EV revolution.

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.