Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Cap And Trade

"Carbon Tax" More Popular than "Cap-and-Trade" with US Voters

Well, it is a surprise to me, and probably to a lot of people. But news from the US Climate Task Force and Fortune 500 is that US voters prefer a straight carbon tax over cap-and-trade once they are educated a little bit on the two options. This is what a recent survey shows. The survey finds that American voters actually prefer a carbon tax by a ratio of more than 2:1!

According to the survey, 58% of people supported the carbon tax, 27% supported cap-and-trade, and 15% were not sure or wanted neither.

Why might this be the case?


People are a bit averse to taxes. We all know that. However, according to Frank Luntz’ major new study on climate and energy issues, people really want to see “accountability for businesses and corporations.” Maybe once they understand what a carbon tax is compared to cap-an-trade, people feel that a carbon tax would take care of that issue most effectively. This is the first thought that comes to my head.

Of course, the concern that comes to my mind immediately after that is that once the issue hits mainstream media more, the anti-climate and clean energy crew would use the word “tax” to their advantage to scare the hell out of the general populous. But, of course, they will do the same with “cap-and-trade” and perhaps just as effectively.

Another issue that may have put the carbon tax higher in the minds of US voters is the fact that the second highest priority for people regarding “energy reform” (which they strongly supported) was that it “minimize new government bureaucracy.” Perhaps, with a cap-and-trade system looking so much more bureaucratic, people wanted to stay away from that more than the carbon tax.

The US Climate Task Force and Fortune 500 have their own list of some specific reasons why people seemed to favor a carbon tax, (the last of which I just conjectured about above). “Voters’ preference for a carbon tax approach to energy and climate change policy is grounded in a range of specific perceived benefits, including the notion that a carbon tax would have a greater positive impact on the environment, be better for the U.S. economy and for U.S. taxpayers, and also do more to achieve other important priorities, such as incentivizing energy-efficient behavior and minimizing new government bureaucracy.”

This preference for a carbon tax was “broadly shared among a diverse array of audiences and holds up across partisan and geographic divides.”

With a proposed bill still a priority but spending a lot of time in the back rooms of Congress right now, perhaps a shift from a cap-and-trade system to a carbon tax system is still an option.

The survey was conducted by telephone and included about 1,000 respondents from August 24-31, 2009.

via ecopolitology

Related Stories:

1) Hollywood Getting into the Action [Video]

2) Who’s More Powerful than Obama?

3) Who Wants a Climate & Energy Bill? 83 Leading US Companies

Image Credit: Denise Cross via flickr under a CC license

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.


You May Also Like


As a living document, the strategy is still deeply flawed, but less flawed than the first one. If the DOE updates it every six...


The US Army is taking a keen interest in new liquefied gas electrolytes for high powered, non-flammable energy storage systems that hold up under...

Climate Change

Canada's pipeline to nowhere keeps getting worse and worse for Canadians. And it's not like anyone in Alberta is thanking the federal Liberals for...


There they go again: Georgia readies new flow battery for the red-hot home energy storage market.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.