Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



4,000,000 Fewer Vehicles on US Roads in 2009

4 million fewer vehicles. This is the first year there was such a large decline in automobile ownership since the US Department of Transportation (DOT) began modern recordkeeping in 1960.

How did this come about? What were the main causes?


Americans bought 10 million vehicles and sent 14 million to the scrapyard in 2009. This is unheard of for a country known for its “love affair with the car” and its many car-oriented cities.

The factors causing the decline are not entirely clear, but popular speculations are the relatively high price of gas, the economic recession, better transit systems, and social networking on the internet or smart phones that is limiting teenagers’ “need” for cars. Additionally, concern about the climate and the environment, and frustration with traffic may also be triggering part of this.

One might be inclined to think this is just a fluke year. The only other year that car ownership declined (in 1991, by 1 million), it quickly increased again the following year. However, others think it is something that will contine in the long term. Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, an environmental think tank based in Washington, says (concerning cars), “We’ve reached a sort of saturation point in this country.”

A long term drop in the number of teenagers getting a drivers license seems to support Brown’s claims. The US teen population is currently the highest ever, but fewer than 10 million teens have a license, whereas in the late 1970s approximately 12 million had a license.

Brown delves much deeper into this issue that the US may have reached a “car saturation” point, though. We have ” 246 million registered motor vehicles and 209 million licensed drivers—nearly 5 vehicles for every 4 drivers” in the US. Doesn’t it seem a little absurd to have more cars than drivers?

Additionally, as the US becomes more and more urban, as our cities continue to densify, the car becomes less of a help and more of an inconvenience. Brown compares the US with Japan 20 years ago, when he says they hit their car saturation point, and shows that as their cities grew in density, their car ownership shrunk (by 21% in total).

To put some numbers to the inconvenience caused by using a car in dense or congested cities, the Texas Transportation Institute showed that “congestion costs, including fuel wasted and time lost, climbed from $17 billion in 1982 to $87 billion in 2007.” Yes, a $70 billion increase in congestion costs over 15 years!

Brown reports that transit ridership increased 9% from 2005 to 2008. From 2006-2008 transit use grew by up to 47% in major metropolitan areas. Many cities are helping their citizens who are tired of sitting in traffic by improving public transit, reducing automobile dependence through various urban planning changes, and promoting better walking and bicycling environments.

It is unclear what portions of the decrease in car ownership were due to the different factors above. It is also unclear if the trend will continue. But it gives us something to think about. Is now the time to push for a major shift in our nation’s transportation patterns and infrastructure? I think it is.

via The Globe and Mail and Earth Policy Institute

Related Stories:

1) Transit Use Boom, but in Some Surprising Cities

2) #1 Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Great Bicycle City Photo Tour

3) North Carolina and Virginia Ask for $5 Billion for High-Speed Rail (but Not the Only Ones)

4) Transformational Transportation Bill is ‘in Traffic’

Image Credit 1: Benj Haisch via flickr under a CC license

Image Credit 2: Stu Seeger via flickr under a CC license

Image Credit 3: Dustin Diaz via flickr under a CC license

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

Solar power will offset electricity for a steel mill that makes well casings for oil and gas drilling operations.


Progress in applied research at Argonne National Laboratory raises hopes that solid-state batteries will replace conventional lithium-ion batteries sooner rather than later.

Clean Transport

Originally published by Penn State News By Sara LaJeunesse Ride-hailing services, like Uber and Lyft, are lauded by some for their ability to decrease...

Offshore Wind Energy

The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Wind Energy Technologies Office (WETO) provides global leadership in fundamental wind energy science research, development, and validation activities...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.