Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Fossil Fuels

Offshore Energy (Oil) Could Create 6,700 Jobs for N. Carolina


East Coast states gearing-up for a push to develop “energy” on the Outer Continental Shelf.

Just days after California lawmakers rejected a proposal that would have approved the first new offshore oil leases in state waters in forty years, industry organizations are lining-up on the East Coast to tout the economic benefits of offshore oil and gas development. According to a new report (pdf) released by the Southeast Energy Alliance—a consortium of utilities, oil and gas companies, manufacturing associations, and major power purchasers—North Carolina alone could receive up to $577 million annually in revenue sharing payments from offshore energy development.

But even though the Department of Interior recently reported that the shallow coastal waters of the Mid-Atlantic—including those in and around North Carolina’s Outer Banks—are ripe for large-scale wind energy development, the report defines energy solely in terms of fossil fuel.

Now, I should be clear about one thing here. The report, titled “Potential Job Creation, Economic Benefits and

Revenue Sharing from Oil and Natural Gas

Exploration and Production in North Carolina,” was developed to highlight the economic benefits of fossil fuel development on the Outer Continental Shelf, and specifically the benefits of revenue-sharing with the federal government to reap more royalty monies from oil and gas development. And that’s fine.

But if industry associations and umbrella advocacy groups like the Southeast Energy Alliance, and its parent organization, the Consumer Energy Alliance, are going to wave the “all of the above” energy policy banner, they ought to do so in earnest and with a bit more transparency. It seems the top of wind energy could at least be broached by the paper’s authors If oil and gas exploration is part of a larger strategic mission that includes the development of clean energy resources.

But judging by the press release today that announced the report, you’d have no idea that the report dealt exclusively with oil and gas exploration and development. In fact, the word “oil” is not even mentioned until the eighth and final paragraph of the press release. To get a feel of the kind of linguistic evasiveness I’m talking about, this is what the beginning of the release looks like:

Report: Offshore Energy Development Could Create 6,700 Jobs and

Bring North Carolina up to $577 Million Annually

As state struggles to meet massive budget shortfall,

report confirms huge amounts of revenue exist safely offshore

Raleigh, N.C. – North Carolina could receive up to $577 million annually in revenue sharing payments from offshore energy development, according to a report to be released today by the Southeast Energy Alliance (SEA).

The report, which will be distributed prior to a panel discussion on North Carolina’s available offshore energy resources and the potential for federal revenue sharing, discusses job creation, economic growth and revenues that could come to the state if it chooses to participate in offshore energy development along the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) and if Congress extends a royalty revenue sharing program to the state…

I understand that the purpose of the paper was to tout the benefits of oil and gas development. That is fine. But if the report is about petroleum, say that in the press release. If old-school “energy” industry groups want to prove that they are serious about non-fossil energy sources, they have to do much more than muddy their own preferences in some veiled attempt to gain public support.

Image © Yobidab; NREL

Follow Tim Hurst on twitter

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica member, supporter, or ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

New Podcast: How NVIDIA Is Bringing Autonomy To Automakers

Written By

is the founder of ecopolitology and the executive editor at LiveOAK Media, a media network about the politics of energy and the environment, green business, cleantech, and green living. When not reading, writing, thinking or talking about environmental politics with anyone who will listen, Tim spends his time skiing in Colorado's high country, hiking with his dog, and getting dirty in his vegetable garden.


#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.


Support our work today!


Power CleanTechnica: $3/Month

Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports


EV Sales Charts, Graphs, & Stats

EV Press Releases


Our Electric Car Driver Report

30 Electric Car Benefits

Tesla Model 3 Video

Renewable Energy 101 In Depth

solar power facts

Tesla News

EV Reviews

Home Efficiency

You May Also Like

Clean Power

The renewable energy developer Avangrid claps back at wind turbine bird death canard with new condor breeding program.


Shell and Scuderia Ferrari put high performance biofuel pedal to the metal for Formula 1 carbon neutral goal.

Clean Power

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory's new SolarAPP aims to unleash a flood of solar panels upon a nation thirsting for more clean power.


Globe-punching Will Ferrel, arrow-slinging Aquafina, and cosplaying Kenan Thompson light up GM's "Everybody In" electric vehicle campaign.

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.