Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Walmart Supplier Seeks Carbon Accountant

Let’s say you have a clothing company that supplies Walmart.

They’ve hinted for years that they are about to demand sustainably produced merchandiseAnd last week they announced it: Walmart’s new Sustainability Index.

Governments have been unable to change the world. But the planet’s shopkeeper is just so much more powerful.

Oh dear, you say. We can’t lose Walmart. Let’s answer the first question. 1. What is your carbon footprint?

Well, um…gee.

Let’s start with that one handbag we sell to Walmart: We make the handbag parts in 3 factories in 2 continents and an island. We receive the raw materials for the handbag…

1. by camel to that little handbag clasp factory outside Calcutta (5 miles X 120 days per year; camel eats 356,794 pounds of grain shipped by diesel ship 254,998 miles = carbon cost of 2 tons per year for inbound shipping costs),

2. by UPS to a factory in a business park in Seattle (2,900 miles X 340 days per year; using 57% diesel-hybrid trucks =  inbound shipping carbon cost of 34 tons per year )

3. by airfreight to a little factory on Tuvalu (whatever…you get the idea)

and then we ship the finished product 3,900,798 miles by ship powered by… (and so on…)

…to say nothing of figuring out the carbon footprint at each of the factories:

1. factory A in Calcutta gets its power from a 76% coal fired utility; so the 2,800 kwh used annually turning out 395, 567 units there = unit production carbon cost of 467 tons per year

2. while factory B in Seattle can buy greenpower so the 456 kwh we use annually = a carbon footprint of 1 ton per year….

3. factory C is 100% solar powered in Tuvalu and those seven seamstresses walk to work so those 976 kwh used per year = carbon footprint of 0.

Now for each of these factories find total carbon tons divided by annual units produced = the carbon tons per unit.

So per handbag carbon footprint = .004 carbon tons per unit. (in tons or whatever the unit will be. Maybe it will be in kilograms like the way Europeans measure auto emissions. They have been at it longer than us, so they ll get to lead.)

You get the idea. If you love creating math fun in excel, this is just a real software developers dream.

Unlike money accounting which developed over centuries with logical improvements for calculating net worth or cost of goods sold – standardized carbon accounting will have to get up and running fast.

We already have lots of software for money accounting. That’s relatively easy software to create.

Carbon emissions from energy use in creating and shipping products are so very much more complex to track than just mere dollars. Now that companies and governments need carbon emission data, they need to track it like income and expenses.

Just as they bought financial accounting software, now they’ll need carbon accounting software.

Already more than 3,000 firms worldwide are trying to calculate their corporate carbon footprint using custom spreadsheets developed in-house. Only 300 have used carbon accounting software.

As they realize the advantages of using standardized applications for accurate accounting, they’ll need the equivalent of Quickbooks to do their carbon accounting like the rest of the business math.

Among the 50 or so companies attempting to make this software are PE International,  and Clear Standards; which was just bought by SAP.

There’s 20 key software features to consider before selecting which software to buy, according to the Enterprise Carbon Accounting: An Analysis of Organizational-Level Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting and a Review of Emerging GHG Software Products, created as a buyers guide.

I hope that this makes for easier reading than that title!

Via Greentech Media

Image from Flikr user praziquantel

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

Wrights Law isn't going to save the deep inefficiencies of SMRs. As I pointed out two years ago, the world tried tiny commercial nuclear...

Climate Change

Held vs. Montana is a succinct legal climate challenge, but such climate cases are new and uncertain.


The number of new VLCCs to be delivered in 2024? Zero. The number to be delivered in 2025? One.


After stumbling on biofuel, algae finds its footing and steps up to help the concrete industry cut its carbon footprint, too.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.