Of all the lines in the envisioned US high speed rail network, California is the one with the most momentum behind it. The state has started to fund the line that is designed to take passengers from San Francisco to Los Angeles in two and a half hours. Money is the biggest obstacle to realizing America’s rail modernization, but California is countering this problem by showing the value added these trains will bring to the state.
Concerns over cost is the principle argument against high speed rail in the US, but independent economic studies done on the feasibility of the project show that the line will generate $1 billion in surplus revenue annually after completion. Start-up costs for this infrastructure in the nation’s most populous state are estimated to be roughly half of what it would cost not to build the route. Highway and airport expansion would be much more costly and detrimental to the environment. These facts are pushing California to have the nation’s first true high speed rail at the current pace of development.
The price tag of the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) Corridor is $40 billion. The CHSR received a boost when a $10 billion dollar bond issue was passed in November 2008. Money from the stimulus bill is also expected. A portion of the $8 billion investment from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is expected to go to California as well as $1 billion per year from the federal government in grants over the next five years the US Department of Transportation.
The government will only partially fund CHSR. In total 25% to 33% of the line will be paid for at the federal level. For the project to obtain the vital funding required for its completion, private enterprise will be needed to come up with the rest of the cash in a private-public partnership (P3) arrangement.
This is a divergence from the way high speed rail has been developed around the planet. Governments around the globe have historically been the sole start-up investor in high speed rail, be they in Europe (Deutsche Bahn, SNCF) or Asia (Japanese Railways, China Railways). Even though the project has strong political backing at the federal level by President Obama, from governor Schwarzenegger and the mayors of California’s major cities, the option to fully back CHSR publicaly was not pursued vigorously. The search for investors can potentially delay construction. Under the current timetable the route is to be completed in 2020.
CSHR has benefited from the Golden State’s progressive attitude towards rail modernization. The 700 mile line that will maintain a sustained speed of 220 mph is planned to be a model for the rest of the nation’s high speed rail network and possibly wrest away the flagship title away from the Acela Express of the Northeast Corridor. It aims to be a world class service that will rival the already established networks of Europe and Japan.
[photo credit: California High Speed Rail Authority]
This is the 3rd of a 13-part series on high speed rail in the USA. Read previous articles: High Speed Rail – 12 Corridors to be Stimulated, High Speed Rail at 90 mph?! ARRA & the Northeast Corridor
I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.