Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Energy Efficiency

New York's Grand Central Station: A Model of Energy Efficiency?

grand central station

At first glance, the nearly hundred year old Grand Central Station doesn’t look particularly energy efficient—after all, the station does contain 60,000 lightbulbs. But New York City officials are doing their best to make sure the terminal sets an example for other public buildings in the city.

The Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) has replaced the 20,000 interior bulbs in the station with CFLs that look like the building’s original round bulbs. Additionally, the MTA is testing out CFLs for the building’s chandeliers— although finding bulbs that have the correct shape, color, and lighting appearance is a challenge. The bulb-replacement spree will save the MTA quite a bit of money—$100,000 a year, in fact.

And the bulbs aren’t the only part of Grand Central’s energy efficiency scheme. The building is equipped with a unique air-conditioning system that uses low-cost lithium bromide and steam running beneath the building. The air-conditioner is almost twice as efficient as conventional systems and is much cheaper.

The station also collects over five tons of paper each day as part of a newspaper recycling program.

While it is easy to point out other ways that Grand Central’s energy efficiency could be improved—with solar panels on the roof, for example—we have to remember that the MTA is severely limited by the station’s designation as a National Historic Landmark (meaning the organization needs to get approval for almost every change made to the building). So considering what it has to work with, I’d say that the MTA is performing admirably.

More Posts on Alternative Energy:

 
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:



I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Advertisement
 
Written By

was formerly the editor of CleanTechnica and is a senior editor at Co.Exist. She has contributed to SF Weekly, Popular Science, Inhabitat, Greenbiz, NBC Bay Area, GOOD Magazine, and more. A graduate of Vassar College, she has previously worked in publishing, organic farming, documentary film, and newspaper journalism. Her interests include permaculture, hiking, skiing, music, relocalization, and cob (the building material). She currently resides in San Francisco, CA.

Comments

You May Also Like

Agriculture

In sales pitches for methanol and ammonia for maritime fuels, the numbers don't add up, and the omissions are glaring.

Boats

Nuclear for commercial ships is so obviously flawed from a business perspective that I didn't even bother to include it in my quadrant chart...

Aviation

The future of all ground transportation and an awful lot of aviation and marine shipping being electric, low-carbon, quieter, and a lot less smelly...

Aviation

We have enough waste biomass feedstock to fulfill all of our transportation needs, and the market and a bunch of bright people will figure...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.