<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Wisconsin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/wisconsin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Did Commissioner Ellen Nowak Advise WEC’s CEO?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/28/commissioner-ellen-nowak-advise-wecs-ceo/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/28/commissioner-ellen-nowak-advise-wecs-ceo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 21:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen’s Utility Board of Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen Nowak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gale Klappa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kira Loehr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mallery & Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public service commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waukesha County Executive Dan Vrakas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Energy Corp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Did Commissioner Ellen Nowak advise Wisconsin Energy Corp's CEO? Some of her remarks in panel discussions suggest that the Wisconsin regulator might be a captured regulator</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/28/commissioner-ellen-nowak-advise-wecs-ceo/">Did Commissioner Ellen Nowak Advise WEC’s CEO?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/28/commissioner-ellen-nowak-advise-wecs-ceo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark Money Makes The Utility World Go ‘Round</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/14/dark-money-makes-utility-world-go-round/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/14/dark-money-makes-utility-world-go-round/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Allen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We Energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A so-called consumer advocacy group from Houston, Texas, with ties to the fossil fuel-loving Koch brothers, recently submitted 2,500 signatures from Wisconsin ratepayers to the Wisconsin Public Service Commission in support of across-the-board rate hikes from utilities Madison Gas &#38; Electric and We Energies. The We Energies’ proposal also included a hefty additional tax on </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/14/dark-money-makes-utility-world-go-round/">Dark Money Makes The Utility World Go ‘Round</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/14/dark-money-makes-utility-world-go-round/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Energy Efficiency Ranks Released: How&#8217;d Your State Do?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combined heat and power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Market Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle miles traveled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin energy efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts and California top ACEEE's energy efficiency ranks for the fourth straight year while clear winners and losers stand out across America</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/">US Energy Efficiency Ranks Released: How&#8217;d Your State Do?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Royal &#8220;WE&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/royal/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/royal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Allen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We Energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WE Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the battle for our energy future, we’ve seen some pretty devious attacks on rooftop solar, and the latest salvos from Wisconsin’s We Energies are in the running for top honors. If you followed recent attacks on net metering in Arizona, you have an inkling of what’s going down in the Midwest. Here’s the skinny: </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/royal/">The Royal &#8220;WE&#8221;</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/royal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Highlight: Wisconsin Solar, Incentives &amp; Facts</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/25/wisconsin-solar-incentives-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/25/wisconsin-solar-incentives-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Markham]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin solar energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cost of Solar. The state of Wisconsin offers incentives to help people improve energy efficiency, increase insulation in their homes and businesses, and convert to solar and renewable power. Solar power increased in Wisconsin in 2013 by 17%. Among Wisconsin solar incentives are a rebate program, several tax breaks, a loan program, net metering, and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/25/wisconsin-solar-incentives-facts/">State Highlight: Wisconsin Solar, Incentives &#038; Facts</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/25/wisconsin-solar-incentives-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both Red &amp; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative utility revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer market incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Reicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed power systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE State Energy Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings Performance Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient building code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal grant program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Schulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratories of democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Bill Repayment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onsite clean power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RETs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Clean Energy Cookbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steyer-Taylor Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Force on Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-variant pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bingaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Congress squelching innovation in Washington, we need to look to the states for policies green on energy. A study released by Stanford University and the Hoover Institution this week (The State Clean Energy Cookbook: A Dozen Recipes for State Action on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) cites 12 innovative projects being implemented by almost 20 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/">Both Red &#038; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midwesterners Increasingly In Favor Of Renewable Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/12/midwesterners-increasingly-favor-renewable-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/12/midwesterners-increasingly-favor-renewable-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midwesterners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new poll has found that a substantial majority of Midwesterners believe renewable energy is a reliable and affordable option that is not only an increasing source of good jobs, but is also a good way to ensure the country&#8217;s energy generation is self-reliant and secure. The poll, conducted by a bipartisan pair of researching companies, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/12/midwesterners-increasingly-favor-renewable-energy/">Midwesterners Increasingly In Favor Of Renewable Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/12/midwesterners-increasingly-favor-renewable-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PACE Could Drive More Solar Adoption In Commercial Market</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/18/pace-drive-solar-adoption-commercial-market/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/18/pace-drive-solar-adoption-commercial-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borrego solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder County Climate Smart PACE Loan Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jackie Pitera. In the United States, access to third-party financing has been a main driver in bringing solar projects of all sizes across the finish line. While wide availability of third-party power purchase agreements (PPAs) and leases has enabled rapid solar adoption within the residential sector and with larger commercial solar projects, smaller commercial </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/18/pace-drive-solar-adoption-commercial-market/">PACE Could Drive More Solar Adoption In Commercial Market</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/18/pace-drive-solar-adoption-commercial-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Was #2 Source Of Power Plant Capacity Additions In 2013 (Charts)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/15/natural-gas-generated-50-power-plant-capacity-additions-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/15/natural-gas-generated-50-power-plant-capacity-additions-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edwardsport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemper County IGCC project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standard policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable portfolio standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Creek Energy Station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Power plant capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Today in Energy. Natural gas-fired power plants accounted for just over 50% of new utility-scale generating capacity added in 2013. Solar provided nearly 22%, a jump up from less than 6% in 2012. Coal provided 11% and wind nearly 8%. Almost half of all capacity added in 2013 was located in California. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/15/natural-gas-generated-50-power-plant-capacity-additions-2013/">Solar Was #2 Source Of Power Plant Capacity Additions In 2013 (Charts)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/15/natural-gas-generated-50-power-plant-capacity-additions-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Largest Cleantech Accelerator Selects Top Midwest Startups</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/30/worlds-largest-cleantech-accelerator-selects-top-midwest-startups/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/30/worlds-largest-cleantech-accelerator-selects-top-midwest-startups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Actives Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akhan Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Arbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arborlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bearing Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brainerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brookings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calumet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulose Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech Open Global Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deerfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EcoSpinners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EcoStud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effortless Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Envirolastech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garden Fresh Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRNE Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoffman Estates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroponic farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InBalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indoor hydroponic farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InvenTek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maplewood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NanoGas Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ornicept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prairie AquaTech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowbot Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SkySpecs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small wind turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waconia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Lafayette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The&#160;Cleantech Open is reportedly the largest cleantech accelerator program in the world. It conducts regional cleantech startup competitions which then lead to a national (US) competition, the Cleantech Open Global Forum. The winners of the Midwest regional competition were recently announced. 3 startups moved on to the&#160;Cleantech Open Global Forum, out of the 21 that </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/30/worlds-largest-cleantech-accelerator-selects-top-midwest-startups/">World&#8217;s Largest Cleantech Accelerator Selects Top Midwest Startups</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/30/worlds-largest-cleantech-accelerator-selects-top-midwest-startups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Libertarians Join Greens In Favor Of Solar Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/10/wisconsin-libertarians-join-greens-in-favor-of-solar-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/10/wisconsin-libertarians-join-greens-in-favor-of-solar-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Important Media Cross-Post]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Libertarian Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=56240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Think Progress. By Kiley Kroh. In a surprising move, Wisconsin’s Libertarian Party is endorsing a proposal to allow the state’s electricity customers lease solar panels and other small renewable energy generators. The Clean Energy Choice Initiative is spearheaded by a local clean energy group, RENEW Wisconsin, and while the Libertarians are often find themselves </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/10/wisconsin-libertarians-join-greens-in-favor-of-solar-energy/">Wisconsin Libertarians Join Greens In Favor Of Solar Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/10/wisconsin-libertarians-join-greens-in-favor-of-solar-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Map Guides Great Lakes Climate Change Adaptation Planning</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate resiliency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook County Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Scavia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flint Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Sustainability Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwaters Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York State climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The growing effects of climate change make adaptation more important every day, but without accurate data to guide planning, government action risks being ineffective or insufficient.</p>
<p>That’s where a new interactive map from the University of Michigan comes into the picture, combining economic, infrastructure, and population data for 225 counties in the Great Lakes region</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/">Online Map Guides Great Lakes Climate Change Adaptation Planning</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Solar States vs Top Solar Countries (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulgaria solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malta solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south africa solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spain solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thailand solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following our top solar states rankings and our top solar countries rankings, below are rankings that mix the two. The rankings are for total and new solar power capacity per capita as well as total and new solar power per GDP. I thin the results are very interesting&#8230;. If you missed these previous rankings, also </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/">Top Solar States vs Top Solar Countries (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Solar Power States Per Capita (Updated) vs Top Solar Policy Leaders (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last year, I put together rankings of the top solar power countries per capita, per GDP, and per TWh of electricity production. In January, I then created rankings of the top solar power states per capita and followed those up with rankings of the top solar power states per capita vs the top solar power </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/">Top Solar Power States Per Capita (Updated) vs Top Solar Policy Leaders (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Soybeans To Solar &#8212; A Community Energy Project Sprouts From Wisconsin Fields</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/16/from-soybeans-to-solar-a-community-energy-project-sprouts-from-wisconsin-fields/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/16/from-soybeans-to-solar-a-community-energy-project-sprouts-from-wisconsin-fields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This post originally appeared on ILSR’s Energy Self-Reliant States blog. Just north of Delavan, Wisconsin, is Dan Osborne’s nursery farm. Where you once found a bean field now sit 80 solar panels on 100 tracking towers, generating renewable power for over 125 homes. It’s a small, but successful community-owned energy harvest.  The solar farm was developed </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/16/from-soybeans-to-solar-a-community-energy-project-sprouts-from-wisconsin-fields/">From Soybeans To Solar &#8212; A Community Energy Project Sprouts From Wisconsin Fields</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/16/from-soybeans-to-solar-a-community-energy-project-sprouts-from-wisconsin-fields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Steve-Johnson-interview-on-Local-Energy-Rules.mp3" length="21692220" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Attack On Renewable Energy Standards, In Numbers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reposted from Greentech Media: By Herman Trabish At least twenty-two of the 29 state renewables standards have been attacked by legislators or regulators in the last year or are now under attack. Known as a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) or a Renewable Energy Standard (RES), these mandates require utilities to obtain a portion of their </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/">The Attack On Renewable Energy Standards, In Numbers</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Bike Challenge Ends with 30K Riders Going 12 Million Miles</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/14/national-bike-challenge-ends-with-30k-riders-going-12-million-miles/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/14/national-bike-challenge-ends-with-30k-riders-going-12-million-miles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chelsea]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burlington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[League of American Bicyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bike Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=42690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; The 2012 National Bike Challenge came to an end August 31, with a whopping 30,000 riders pedaling 12 million miles over four months. The Challenge, sponsored by Kimberly-Clark Corporation, League of American Bicyclists, Endomondo, and Bikes Belong, included some lighthearted online competition between states, communities, universities, workplaces, and individual riders. Vermont took first place </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/14/national-bike-challenge-ends-with-30k-riders-going-12-million-miles/">National Bike Challenge Ends with 30K Riders Going 12 Million Miles</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/14/national-bike-challenge-ends-with-30k-riders-going-12-million-miles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vermont &amp; Wisconsin Battle for Biking Bragging Rights</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/vermont-wisconsin-battle-for-biking-bragging-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/vermont-wisconsin-battle-for-biking-bragging-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chelsea]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burlington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burlington bicyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burlington bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burlington biking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin bicycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin bicyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin biking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Since May 1, Burlington cyclists have pedaled almost 200,000 miles, putting them at the top of the National Bike Challenge. Vermont is also ranking #1 in the state rankings. Wisconsin won&#8217;t go down without a fight, though. The Cheesehead state is sitting pretty with five of the top 10 cycling communities in this year&#8217;s </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/vermont-wisconsin-battle-for-biking-bragging-rights/">Vermont &#038; Wisconsin Battle for Biking Bragging Rights</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/vermont-wisconsin-battle-for-biking-bragging-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can Support a Huge (102.5-MW) Wind Farm in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Wind Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin wind farm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; A reader shared this with us on the CleanTechnica Facebook timeline. It&#8217;s a petition to support a huge wind farm in Wisconsin. It wasn&#8217;t created out of any special attack on the wind farm, it seems, but just proactively to help make sure this important wind farm moves forward through the permitting process. Personally, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/">You Can Support a Huge (102.5-MW) Wind Farm in Wisconsin</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Wind Energy Projects (7 More Big Ones)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/22/new-wind-energy-projects-7-big-ones/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/22/new-wind-energy-projects-7-big-ones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tidal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A123]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A123 Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auwahi Wind project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burgos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community wind project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edison mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Gallo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EverPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firstwind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier Hills Wind Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[li-ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OwnEnergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palouse wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palouse Wind project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pinnacle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pinnacle wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taloga project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vestas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We Energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitman county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Just finished my new solar energy project roundup of the week, so on to wind&#8230;. Here are the 7 big ones I&#8217;ve seen this week (other than what we&#8217;ve covered.. or are about to cover): 1. 21-MW Hawaii wind project to lean on 11-MW lithium ion battery bank. A123 Systems, an advanced lithium ion </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/22/new-wind-energy-projects-7-big-ones/">New Wind Energy Projects (7 More Big Ones)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/22/new-wind-energy-projects-7-big-ones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
