<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>North America's carbon markets just completed the first international cap-and-trade system linkage and raised $500 million for clean energy investment</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/">Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.7 Billion+ Trips Taken On Public Transportation In 2nd Quarter</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Transit / Public Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trains / Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Public Transportation Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caltrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO Michael Melaniphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commuter rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas-Ft. Worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hampton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light-rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceanside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR and San Carlos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Mateo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>US public transportation ridership increased yet again in the second quarter of 2014. A press release report released by the American Public Transportation Association showed urban mobility increasing to over 2.7 billion trips on US public transportation in the second quarter. Urban travelers are making commonsense choices for their pockets and the environment, effecting a 1.1% increase in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/">2.7 Billion+ Trips Taken On Public Transportation In 2nd Quarter</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Energy Efficiency Ranks Released: How&#8217;d Your State Do?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combined heat and power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Market Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle miles traveled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin energy efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts and California top ACEEE's energy efficiency ranks for the fourth straight year while clear winners and losers stand out across America</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/">US Energy Efficiency Ranks Released: How&#8217;d Your State Do?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/us-energy-efficiency-ranks-released-howd-your-state-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both Red &amp; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative utility revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer market incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Reicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed power systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE State Energy Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings Performance Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient building code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal grant program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Schulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratories of democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Bill Repayment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onsite clean power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RETs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Clean Energy Cookbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steyer-Taylor Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Force on Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-variant pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bingaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Congress squelching innovation in Washington, we need to look to the states for policies green on energy. A study released by Stanford University and the Hoover Institution this week (The State Clean Energy Cookbook: A Dozen Recipes for State Action on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) cites 12 innovative projects being implemented by almost 20 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/">Both Red &#038; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Washington State Buck The Trend?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/26/will-washington-state-buck-the-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/26/will-washington-state-buck-the-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dever Kuni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Installers of Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published by the ECOreport  Between 70% and 80% of California’s solar installations are leased from third party companies. This model has been reproduced throughout much of the US, but some Washington installers want to do something different. They believe that money raised from local taxpayers should be used to promote the growth of local </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/26/will-washington-state-buck-the-trend/">Will Washington State Buck The Trend?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/26/will-washington-state-buck-the-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amtrak Expands Fast East Coast Acela Fleet</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/amtrak-expands-fast-east-coast-acela-fleet/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/amtrak-expands-fast-east-coast-acela-fleet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-Speed Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Transit / Public Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[average speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free WiFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inter-city train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northeast Corridor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passenger train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail seats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railroad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roomy comfort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seat width]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Central Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tilting train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trips per day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Amtrak’s 13-year-old Acela trains&#160;have made a huge difference to commuting and other travel along the busy Northeast corridor between Boston and Washington, DC. Now a 6.5-hour trip, it used to take a full business day, or longer. The high-speed, tilting, inter-city train, currently the country’s fastest, can achieve up to 150&#160;mph (240&#160;km/h).&#160;(Note: a faster, 200-mph&#160;Houston-Dallas </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/amtrak-expands-fast-east-coast-acela-fleet/">Amtrak Expands Fast East Coast Acela Fleet</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/amtrak-expands-fast-east-coast-acela-fleet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Of America&#8217;s Best Solar Incentives Are In Washington (State)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/29/americas-best-solar-incentives-are-in-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/29/americas-best-solar-incentives-are-in-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar permitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington solar incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington solar permitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington solar policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington solar subsidies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published in the ECOreport. An “emergency rule” that went into effect on July 1 is expected to increase the average solar installer’s business by 10% to 30%. The state Building Code Council made it possible for homeowners to install rooftop solar power systems without an engineer’s approval. This saves them between $500 to $2,500 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/29/americas-best-solar-incentives-are-in-washington/">Some Of America&#8217;s Best Solar Incentives Are In Washington (State)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/29/americas-best-solar-incentives-are-in-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tacoma Will Mandate EV Charging Stations</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/tacoma-will-mandate-ev-charging-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/tacoma-will-mandate-ev-charging-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Brown]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging Stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Boe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lonergan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marilyn Strickland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marty Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Thoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tacoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The city of Tacoma, Washington will mandate the installation of EV charging stations on the property of new commercial buildings. This will require 1-3% of their parking stalls be EV ready. The ordinance caps the number of required charging stations at six for office buildings, eight for shopping centres, and twelve for larger sites such as auditoriums </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/tacoma-will-mandate-ev-charging-stations/">Tacoma Will Mandate EV Charging Stations</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/tacoma-will-mandate-ev-charging-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Did US Renewable Energy Policy Get So Off Track?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/us/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush Sr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy Policy Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Energy Post By Allan Hoffman In 1978 a monumental multi-departmental study was submitted to President Carter concluding that “solar energy could make a significant contribution to U.S. energy supply by the end of this century”. The study, backed by 30 federal departments, stated that “even with today’s subsidized energy prices, many solar technologies are already </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/us/">How Did US Renewable Energy Policy Get So Off Track?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington’s EV Development Could Progress Very Quickly</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/01/washingtons-ev-development-could-progress-very-quickly/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/01/washingtons-ev-development-could-progress-very-quickly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging Stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Jay Inslee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington's EV Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the ECOreport The 2009 “Green Highways bill” (HB 1481) opened the door for Washington state’s EV infrastructure. With the help of funding through the Federal Recovery Act, Governor Chris Gregoire announced construction of “the nation’s first true electrified highway” in June 2010, which was to stretch out along the 276 miles of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/01/washingtons-ev-development-could-progress-very-quickly/">Washington’s EV Development Could Progress Very Quickly</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/01/washingtons-ev-development-could-progress-very-quickly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Windows Startup Using NREL Patents</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/title-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/title-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 09:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America Next Top Energy Innovator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amplifier Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooperative Research and Development Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Chromic Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochromic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Aberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loren Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series Seed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart window technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By James Lester Smart windows have been slow to grab a foothold in the construction and energy efficiency industry. The recent development of electrochromic (EC) windows, often called “smart windows”, promise to make a big impact on building heating and cooling costs. They are ‘smart’ because they can be programmed to absorb and reflect a different amount of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/title-2/">Smart Windows Startup Using NREL Patents</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/title-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMW Carbon Fiber Production To Triple</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/bmw-investing-200-million-triple-production-carbon-fiber/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/bmw-investing-200-million-triple-production-carbon-fiber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015 BMW i8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW i3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bmw i8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moses Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Gas2. Though production of the BMW i3 and i8 have only just begun, the automaker is investing $200 million to triple production of carbon fiber. This could be the move that helps take carbon fiber into the mainstream. With 10,000 pre-orders for the BMW i3 and the BMW i8 reportedly already sold out </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/bmw-investing-200-million-triple-production-carbon-fiber/">BMW Carbon Fiber Production To Triple</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/bmw-investing-200-million-triple-production-carbon-fiber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Could Double Hydropower Production</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernest Moniz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of the River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Mead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Platte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Ridge National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Grande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Platte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Climate Central. By Bobby Magill The Grand Canyon was once targeted as a major dam site by the federal government, a project eventually scuttled after widespread protest. Nobody is revisiting the idea of a dam there, but a new U.S. Department of Energy report shows that the Grand Canyon and other major gorges and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/">US Could Double Hydropower Production</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USGBC Launches New Online LEED Resource</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/02/usgbc-launches-new-online-leed-resource/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/02/usgbc-launches-new-online-leed-resource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 14:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahesh Ramanujam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Green Building Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Green Building Elements. By Dawn Killough The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) recently launched its new online data visualization resource that highlights real-time green building data for each state in the U.S. and Washington, D.C. The enhanced state market briefs — highlighting LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) projects, LEED-credentialed professionals and USGBC membership in each state — </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/02/usgbc-launches-new-online-leed-resource/">USGBC Launches New Online LEED Resource</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/02/usgbc-launches-new-online-leed-resource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMW i3&#8217;s Carbon Fiber (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/01/bmw-i3-car-produced-carbon-fiber-video/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/01/bmw-i3-car-produced-carbon-fiber-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW i3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon fiber automobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moses Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGL Automotive Carbon Fibers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Gas2. The BMW i3 is the first mass production car to use carbon fiber&#8211;reinforced plastic for a major component en masse. So how’d they do it? BMW gives us the full scoop on this carbon fiber voodoo, from the first strand to the final product, a lightweight and strong passenger compartment that’s </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/01/bmw-i3-car-produced-carbon-fiber-video/">BMW i3&#8217;s Carbon Fiber (VIDEO)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/01/bmw-i3-car-produced-carbon-fiber-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Cooperatives Growing</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/29/solar-cooperatives-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/29/solar-cooperatives-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ace Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amicus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amicus Solar Cooperative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Western]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbondale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCEnergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CD SUN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooperative Community Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar United Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louise Meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowry Community Solar Array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mt. Pleasant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mt. Pleasant Solar Cooperative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiance Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Incentive Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Ely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarPro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Irvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Light & Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunsense Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on RMI Outlet. By Laurie Guevara-Stone While many people associate cooperatives with a place for hippies to buy organic food, the cooperative movement has actually grown far and wide, creating sustainable enterprises that generate jobs and strengthen local economies. Today, there are nearly 30,000 cooperatives in the United States, with more than 100 million members. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/29/solar-cooperatives-growth/">Solar Cooperatives Growing</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/29/solar-cooperatives-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Can We Do About Grid Loss?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/28/can-grid-loss/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/28/can-grid-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasted electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasted electricity sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published in the ECOreport. The world’s transmission lines are believed to have dropped approximately 1.4 trillion kilowatt-hours of electricity last year. That’s around 1.2 trillion metric tons of CO2 dumped into the atmosphere. Though it is unlikely these loses can be eliminated in the near future, there are ways to reduce them. Losses of 5&#8211;7% or so </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/28/can-grid-loss/">What Can We Do About Grid Loss?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/28/can-grid-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Geothermal Market Is Growing</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/26/global-geothermal-market-growing/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/26/global-geothermal-market-growing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Meyers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Annual U.S. & Global Geothermal Power Production Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akutan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Matek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrq Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethiopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEA Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal energy association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honduras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indonesia geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Geothermal Showcase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Gawell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Utility Commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salton Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Imperial Irrigation District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Salton Sea Resource Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Green Building Elements. The following GEA release provides solid information about the geothermal market. New GEA Report Details Trends in Global Geothermal Market A new report from the Geothermal Energy Association (GEA), released [this week] at the organization’s International Geothermal Showcase in Washington, D.C., reveals the international power market is booming, with a </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/26/global-geothermal-market-growing/">Global Geothermal Market Is Growing</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/26/global-geothermal-market-growing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas In New York Marcellus Shale Costs More To Get It Out Than The Gas Is Worth</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeSmog Blog]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben van Beurden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chesapeake energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft 2014 energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elisabeth Radow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fadel Gheit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[League of Women Voters of New York State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyndon Pittinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oppenheimer & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Tillerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volumetric Production Payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on DeSmogBlog. By Sharon Kelly For years, the shale industry has touted the economic benefits it can provide. An overflowing supply of domestic natural gas will help keep heating and electric bills low for American consumers, they argue, while drilling jobs and astounding royalty windfalls for landowners will reinvigorate local economies. These tantalizing promises have </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/">Natural Gas In New York Marcellus Shale Costs More To Get It Out Than The Gas Is Worth</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Was Kansas Really About?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/kansas-really/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/kansas-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 327]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&EI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrical Freedom Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCP&L]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCP&L solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net metering wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westar Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Trying to comprehend the net metering wars. Originally Published in the ECOreport. News of rooftop solar’s most recent victory reached me on Friday, April 4. The Alliance for Solar Choice (TASC) issued a press release stating, “Fresh on the heels of recent ALEC defeats in Utah and Washington, the solar industry today declares victory in Kansas. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/kansas-really/">What Was Kansas Really About?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/kansas-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
