<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; VOST</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/vost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Austin Includes Energy Price Hedge Value In Solar Tariff</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/austin-includes-energy-price-hedge-value-solar-tariff/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/austin-includes-energy-price-hedge-value-solar-tariff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy price hedge value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedged electrical pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price hedging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff (VOST)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rocky Mountain Institute. Renewables scored a major victory recently in the natural gas heartland that is Texas. In a resolution adopted by the Austin City Council on August 28, the city declared solar energy its default generation resource, in part noting “that solar energy represents a cost-competitive means of securing clean peak power hedging against </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/austin-includes-energy-price-hedge-value-solar-tariff/">Austin Includes Energy Price Hedge Value In Solar Tariff</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/austin-includes-energy-price-hedge-value-solar-tariff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar &amp; The Georgia Public Service Commission</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/solar-georgia-public-service-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/solar-georgia-public-service-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Bond]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Power Advanced Solar Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Public Service Commission solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar policy georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TalkSolar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Solar has been taking off in Georgia. In fact, Georgia is ranked 7th for solar according to SEIA. However, solar continues to be an entertaining and sometimes confounding topic in Georgia. Join me as I interview former Georgia Public Service Commissioner Bobby Baker and we discuss the current hot topics at the Georgia Public Service </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/solar-georgia-public-service-commission/">Solar &#038; The Georgia Public Service Commission</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/solar-georgia-public-service-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleantech News: Solar- &amp; EV-Loving Tea Partier Podcast, Barcelona Solar, &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorcycles + Scooters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigant Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy EVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jay leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno Harley-Davidson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno Harley-Davidson LiveWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla Model S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another cleantech news roundup. I&#8217;m making it a short one since I&#8217;m *trying* to start doing these once a day again. Wish me luck! Cleantech News Pie (i.e. solar + EVs + other) I was interviewed for another podcast recently. The interesting thing about this one is that it is conducted by a libertarian, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/">Cleantech News: Solar- &#038; EV-Loving Tea Partier Podcast, Barcelona Solar, &#8230;</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are VOSTs Needed To End Subsidies To Non-Solar Customers?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossborder Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rabago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Brian Orion Utilities across the country have been fighting to curtail net energy metering (NEM) programs in favor of value of solar tariff (VOST) programs, claiming that NEM results in a cost-shift to non-solar customers. However, NEM programs may actually undercompensate solar customers for the true value their systems provide, resulting in a substantial </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/">Are VOSTs Needed To End Subsidies To Non-Solar Customers?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VOST Pros &amp; Cons</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/vost-pros-cons/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/vost-pros-cons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&EI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison Electric Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Comer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meagher & Flom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV-Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skadden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trojan Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TURN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on PV Solar Report. By Rosana Francescato Solar advocates around the country express varying views on the Value of Solar Tariff. Being proposed as an alternative to net metering, the policy has its pros and cons &#8212; but some worry that it imposes a tax on solar customers and gives too much control </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/vost-pros-cons/">VOST Pros &#038; Cons</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/vost-pros-cons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TalkSolar/CleanTechnica Podcast: Democratic Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/10/talksolarcleantechnica-podcast-democratic-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/10/talksolarcleantechnica-podcast-democratic-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 10:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Local Self Reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TalkSolar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In this week&#8217;s TalkSolar/CleanTechnica podcast, Beth Bond chatted with John Farrell,&#160;Director of&#160;Democratic Energy&#160;at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. Regular readers are very familiar with John&#8217;s work, as he has been contributing on CleanTechnica since 2011. Nonetheless, it was great listening to John talk about distributed renewable energy benefits, net metering, value of solar tariffs, different </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/10/talksolarcleantechnica-podcast-democratic-energy/">TalkSolar/CleanTechnica Podcast: Democratic Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/10/talksolarcleantechnica-podcast-democratic-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Enormous Question for ‘Solar Choice’</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/14/enormous-question-solar-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/14/enormous-question-solar-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 22:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago, Minnesota’s Public Utilities Commission ratified the first-ever statewide policy for setting a fair and transparent price on solar energy. This week, a coalition of companies that provide leasing contracts for solar to home and business customers declared war on this “value of solar” policy, and pretty much every financial model for compensating </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/14/enormous-question-solar-choice/">An Enormous Question for ‘Solar Choice’</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/14/enormous-question-solar-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can A Fair Solar Price Win Over Utilities?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/09/can-fair-solar-price-win-utilities/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/09/can-fair-solar-price-win-utilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minnesota solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In March 2014, Minnesota became the first state to adopt a “value of solar” policy to set a fair, transparent price on solar energy. It may serve as a national precedent and fundamentally change the financial relationship between electric utilities and their energy-producing customers. So what will value of solar mean for utility customers producing </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/09/can-fair-solar-price-win-utilities/">Can A Fair Solar Price Win Over Utilities?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/09/can-fair-solar-price-win-utilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Value Of Solar Approaches Merit Our Support</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/05/value-solar-approaches-merit-support/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/05/value-solar-approaches-merit-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Department of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By&#160;Karl R. Rábago Value of Solar analysis and the Value of Solar Tariff adopted in Austin, Texas and Minnesota are promising developments in solar utility rates. These ideas can break the cycle of attacks on rooftop solar and deserve the support of the solar industry, utilities, and others who want to see a future with </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/05/value-solar-approaches-merit-support/">Value Of Solar Approaches Merit Our Support</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/05/value-solar-approaches-merit-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VOSTs Don’t FIT With Our Energy Future</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/02/vosts-dont-fit-energy-future/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/02/vosts-dont-fit-energy-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Allen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST vs FIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST vs net metering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After suffering nine stinging defeats over the past year and a half, big utilities seem to have learned that trying to stop the rooftop solar revolution by killing net energy metering is like standing in the way of a runaway freight train. That’s because everyone from legislators to lobbyists to consumers can clearly see the </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/02/vosts-dont-fit-energy-future/">VOSTs Don’t FIT With Our Energy Future</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/02/vosts-dont-fit-energy-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is A Value Of Solar Tariff (VOST) Really Better Than Net Metering?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/29/value-solar-tariff-vost-formula-benefits-solar/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/29/value-solar-tariff-vost-formula-benefits-solar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[german solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MN VOST report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST formula]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on SolarWakeup. By Yann Brandt Value of solar tariffs, also known as VOSTs, have hit some level of critical mass; at least with public perception and media. The question to ask yourself, as I did; do you know what a value of solar tariff is? Why does it exist? And should you like </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/29/value-solar-tariff-vost-formula-benefits-solar/">Is A Value Of Solar Tariff (VOST) Really Better Than Net Metering?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/29/value-solar-tariff-vost-formula-benefits-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Minnesota’s “Value of Solar” Make Everyone a Winner?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/17/minnesotas-value-solar-make-everyone-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/17/minnesotas-value-solar-make-everyone-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=63984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, Minnesota became the first state to allow utilities a new method of contracting with distributed solar producers, called the market-based “value of solar.” If adopted by utilities, it will fundamentally change the relationship between solar-producing customers and their electric utility. Following Minnesota’s Value of Solar Process? Here are a few resources: Part 1 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/17/minnesotas-value-solar-make-everyone-winner/">Could Minnesota’s “Value of Solar” Make Everyone a Winner?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/17/minnesotas-value-solar-make-everyone-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xcel Energy &#8212; 2-Faced On Value Of Solar Power</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/28/xcel-energy-2-faced-value-solar-power/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/28/xcel-energy-2-faced-value-solar-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xcel energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xcel Energy VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago, I listened – incredulously – to Minnesota’s largest utility, Xcel Energy, suggest that solar energy offers its ratepayers no value as an environmental hedge against carbon emissions or as a price hedge against natural gas fuel price fluctuations. See and share the infographic related to this post But just three days later, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/28/xcel-energy-2-faced-value-solar-power/">Xcel Energy &#8212; 2-Faced On Value Of Solar Power</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/28/xcel-energy-2-faced-value-solar-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Solar Worth To A Utility?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/solar-worth-utility/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/solar-worth-utility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minnesota solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Value of Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=57070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s an issue of national debate, but one unexpected state – Minnesota – is engaging in a formal process for determining the methodology for setting the value of solar. As the first multi-utility process, it’s likely to set a precedent nationwide for what the “value of solar” will mean and whether it will aid the </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/solar-worth-utility/">What Is Solar Worth To A Utility?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/solar-worth-utility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Solar Feed-in Tariff &amp; Value Of Solar Tariff Beneficiaries May Face More Taxes</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/us-solar-feed-in-tariff-value-of-solar-tariff-beneficiaries-may-face-more-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/us-solar-feed-in-tariff-value-of-solar-tariff-beneficiaries-may-face-more-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feed in tariff taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar feed-in tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Solar Love under the title, &#8220;Tax Threat To Solar Homeowners With Feed-in Tariffs or Value Of Solar Tariffs.&#8221; Quite a big deal for US solar policy, solar companies, and even many current solar PV system owners, a solar advocacy organization that is defending net metering in Arizona has discovered that feed-in tariffs </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/us-solar-feed-in-tariff-value-of-solar-tariff-beneficiaries-may-face-more-taxes/">US Solar Feed-in Tariff &#038; Value Of Solar Tariff Beneficiaries May Face More Taxes</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/us-solar-feed-in-tariff-value-of-solar-tariff-beneficiaries-may-face-more-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunrun Supports Net Metering, Not Feed-in Tariffs or Value Of Solar Tariffs</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/sunrun-supports-net-metering-not-feed-in-tariffs-or-value-of-solar-tariffs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/sunrun-supports-net-metering-not-feed-in-tariffs-or-value-of-solar-tariffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[Important Update] Also see: Tax Threat To Solar Homeowners With Feed-in Tariffs or Value Of Solar Tariffs Originally published on Solar Love. It&#8217;s well known that feed-in tariffs have supported most solar power growth across the world. It&#8217;s also well known that very few places in the US offer a solar feed-in tariff (FiT). I was </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/sunrun-supports-net-metering-not-feed-in-tariffs-or-value-of-solar-tariffs/">Sunrun Supports Net Metering, Not Feed-in Tariffs or Value Of Solar Tariffs</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/26/sunrun-supports-net-metering-not-feed-in-tariffs-or-value-of-solar-tariffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 50 Solar Energy Stories Of The Year (Part Five: #41-50)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford SunPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany US Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany vs US solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Renewable Energy Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRENA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin america solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lbnl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merit order effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MyEnergi Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan SunPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV Solar Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real goods solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Resources Atlas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart car solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPIEGEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiegel clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiegel renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiegel solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superchargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supercharges solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla solarcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uc davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Davis smart home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Davis solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Grid Parity Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Renewable Energy Resources Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(If you&#8217;ve read the intro 4 times already, just skip to the final 10 articles.) We&#8217;re trying to get more solar energy stories going over on Planetsave. To catch readers up, I&#8217;m doing a short series on the top 50 solar energy stories of 2013 so far. Learning from the Top 33 EV Stories article I recently published, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/">Top 50 Solar Energy Stories Of The Year (Part Five: #41-50)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Best Things Minnesota Just Did For Solar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/30/3-best-things-minnesota-just-did-for-solar/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/30/3-best-things-minnesota-just-did-for-solar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community solar gardens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota community solar gardens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota solar power incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota value of solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Editor&#8217;s note: The great article below continues the Minnesota focus we&#8217;ve had lately. It also gets into Value of Solar tariffs (VOSTs), which I&#8217;ve covered a few times (full CleanTechnica archives here) and am planning to come back to in a big way, as well as other fun solar topics. Thanks to Adam James and Climate Progress </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/30/3-best-things-minnesota-just-did-for-solar/">3 Best Things Minnesota Just Did For Solar</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/30/3-best-things-minnesota-just-did-for-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Unequal Choices For A Local (Renewable) Energy Future</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/22/three-unequal-choices-for-a-local-renewable-energy-future/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/22/three-unequal-choices-for-a-local-renewable-energy-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens Utility Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralized grids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity Deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xcel energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Earth Day highlights the need for a sustainable energy future, and experience suggests that there are only three meaningful choices for communities trying to increase local control of a greener energy future. But the three policies – deregulation (“customer choice”), municipal aggregation (“city choice”), and municipal utilities (“city ownership”) – are not equal.  Two recent </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/22/three-unequal-choices-for-a-local-renewable-energy-future/">Three Unequal Choices For A Local (Renewable) Energy Future</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/22/three-unequal-choices-for-a-local-renewable-energy-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a long post on the idea of using a &#8220;value of solar&#8221; policy instead of various types of government incentives for solar. Much of that post was based on research conducted by Clean Power Research for Austin Energy &#8212; so that Austin Energy could implement a Value of Solar policy (which it </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/">The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
