<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Utilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/utilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Report: Distributed-Renewables Disruption Will Reduce Utility Revenues By Up To $123 Billion A Year By 2025</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/29/report-distributed-renewables-disruption-will-reduce-utility-revenues-us123-billion-year-2025/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/29/report-distributed-renewables-disruption-will-reduce-utility-revenues-us123-billion-year-2025/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ayre]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digitally Enabled Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility death spiral]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The ongoing growth of distributed renewable energy generation throughout the US and Europe will see utility-company revenues reduced by as much as $123 billion a year by 2025, according to a new report from the consulting company Accenture. That new report &#8212; titled the Digitally Enabled Grid report &#8212; clearly states that if the utilities wish to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/29/report-distributed-renewables-disruption-will-reduce-utility-revenues-us123-billion-year-2025/">Report: Distributed-Renewables Disruption Will Reduce Utility Revenues By Up To $123 Billion A Year By 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/29/report-distributed-renewables-disruption-will-reduce-utility-revenues-us123-billion-year-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels&#8230; Again (+ Other Solar News)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/28/solar-cheaper-fossil-fuels-solar-news/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/28/solar-cheaper-fossil-fuels-solar-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China solar companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china solar panel tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puerto rico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queensland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queensland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soitec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sol-Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunEdison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunverge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YieldCos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s more solar fun for some lazy Sunday (or Monday after Christmas) reading. Enjoy! Solar $$ Solar Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels For New Chilean Projects? UK Solar Installations Still Offer Excellent ROI Peer-to-Peer Financing For Residential Solar Rolled Out In Arizona Living the EV/PV Dream: How I Chose to Pair My Solar System With an Electric </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/28/solar-cheaper-fossil-fuels-solar-news/">Solar Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels&#8230; Again (+ Other Solar News)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/28/solar-cheaper-fossil-fuels-solar-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Powered Cars, Top Solar Stocks (+ Other Solar Stories)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concentrating Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdfunding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Thermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tidal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wave Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feldheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kohl's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kohl's solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nextera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off grid solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar WiFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRP Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In case you just can&#8217;t get enough solar news, analysis, and commentary, here&#8217;s a big link drop of good solar stories we haven&#8217;t already covered on CleanTechnica. Solar powered cars, solar trees, top solar stocks, and much, much more. Enjoy! Fun Solar EV Charging Rocks, But Which Option To Choose? Solar Trees For Solar-Powered EVs Solar </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/">Solar Powered Cars, Top Solar Stocks (+ Other Solar Stories)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A $48 Billion Opportunity For US Electric Customers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/48-billion-opportunity-us-electric-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/48-billion-opportunity-us-electric-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on ilsr.org. Electricity customers in the US got good news last week. A new report from Accenture highlighted a potential revenue loss for US utilities of $48 billion per year by 2025 due to distributed solar and energy efficiency. But where does that money go? If we pursue a democratic energy system as </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/48-billion-opportunity-us-electric-customers/">A $48 Billion Opportunity For US Electric Customers</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/48-billion-opportunity-us-electric-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#8217;s Largest Utility Plans Tax On Solar Leases</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/12/arizonas-largest-utility-plans-tax-solar-leases/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/12/arizonas-largest-utility-plans-tax-solar-leases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Meyers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona's Largest Utility Plans Tax on Solar Leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement And Power District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivint Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This headline on solar leases from an investment site caught my eye: &#8220;Solar Leases Set To Become Toxic in Arizona.&#8221; Drawing free renewable energy from the sun sounds like a grand idea to many – but not if you happen to be a utility company operating with a business model based on the selling energy. Solar, which once had </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/12/arizonas-largest-utility-plans-tax-solar-leases/">Arizona&#8217;s Largest Utility Plans Tax On Solar Leases</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/12/arizonas-largest-utility-plans-tax-solar-leases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar &amp; Wind Power Are Changing Net Load Shapes In California</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/solar-wind-power-changing-net-load-shapes-ca/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/solar-wind-power-changing-net-load-shapes-ca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net load shape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EIA. As more solar and wind electric generating capacity is added in California, the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), the electric grid operator for most of the state, is facing an increasingly different net load shape. Net load—the total electric demand in the system minus wind and solar generation—represents the demand that </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/solar-wind-power-changing-net-load-shapes-ca/">Solar &#038; Wind Power Are Changing Net Load Shapes In California</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/solar-wind-power-changing-net-load-shapes-ca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Sees Second-Largest Solar Installation Growth In Q3</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/09/us-sees-second-largest-solar-installation-q3/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/09/us-sees-second-largest-solar-installation-q3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTM Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-residential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-residential solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States installed 1,354 MW of solar PV in the third quarter of 2014, up 41% over the same period a year earlier, and the making it the second-largest quarter of all time for the US solar industry, bringing the country&#8217;s cumulative solar PV capacity up to 16.1 GW. These numbers come courtesy of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/09/us-sees-second-largest-solar-installation-q3/">US Sees Second-Largest Solar Installation Growth In Q3</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/09/us-sees-second-largest-solar-installation-q3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>25 MW Of Ice Energy Storage For Southern California Edison</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/22/25-mw-ice-energy-storage-southern-california-edison/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/22/25-mw-ice-energy-storage-southern-california-edison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake Richardson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ice Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A company called Ice Energy, located in Glendale, CA, will be providing up to 25 MW of grid support to Southern California Edison in the form of water that is frozen at night when electricity is cheap. During a hot day, the ice is used for cooling in a rooftop air conditioning unit to reduce </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/22/25-mw-ice-energy-storage-southern-california-edison/">25 MW Of Ice Energy Storage For Southern California Edison</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/22/25-mw-ice-energy-storage-southern-california-edison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negative Impacts of Rooftop Solar Will Fall on Utility Investors</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/negative-impacts-of-rooftop-solar-will-fall-on-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/negative-impacts-of-rooftop-solar-will-fall-on-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Satchwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death spiral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratepayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop solar's impact on utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Negative impacts of rooftop solar will fall on investors: potential earnings could drop +40% in some scenarios. Ratepayers will be relatively unaffected</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/negative-impacts-of-rooftop-solar-will-fall-on-investors/">Negative Impacts of Rooftop Solar Will Fall on Utility Investors</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/negative-impacts-of-rooftop-solar-will-fall-on-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Network Charges Can Be A Solar PV Shocker</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/high-network-charges-can-solar-pv-shocker/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/high-network-charges-can-solar-pv-shocker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles Parkinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on RenewEconomy. Phil was in a state of shock earlier this month when he received his electricity bill from hit electricity utility – the first since a 22kW rooftop solar system had been installed at a local church in Buderim, Queensland, where he works. Everything seemed OK. The addition of solar meant that the church’s energy use fell </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/high-network-charges-can-solar-pv-shocker/">High Network Charges Can Be A Solar PV Shocker</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/high-network-charges-can-solar-pv-shocker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Lessons Retail Electricity Pricing Can Learn from Parking Apps</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/03/6-lessons-retail-electricity-pricing-can-learn-parking-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/03/6-lessons-retail-electricity-pricing-can-learn-parking-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail electricity pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rocky Mountain Institute. Even as some foretell a coming future of smart parking—part of a broader ongoing evolution toward intelligent transportation systems (ITS)—a third-party-driven revolution in parking (and its pricing) is already here. That revolution has come by way of a recent proliferation of parking apps for smartphones. Retail electricity pricing is similarly poised to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/03/6-lessons-retail-electricity-pricing-can-learn-parking-apps/">6 Lessons Retail Electricity Pricing Can Learn from Parking Apps</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/03/6-lessons-retail-electricity-pricing-can-learn-parking-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Power Research Lowering Solar Soft Costs by Bringing Interconnection Processes Online</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/clean-power-research-lowering-solar-soft-costs-bringing-interconnection-processes-online/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/clean-power-research-lowering-solar-soft-costs-bringing-interconnection-processes-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ayre]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovative Solar Partner of the Year Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Electric Power Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Clean Power Research &#8212; a solar research, consultation, and software development firm &#8212; recently won the Innovative Solar Partner of the Year Award for its work cooperating with utilities to bring distributed solar interconnection processes online via proprietary software. By bringing said processes online, some of the &#8220;soft costs&#8221; associated with solar energy can be </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/clean-power-research-lowering-solar-soft-costs-bringing-interconnection-processes-online/">Clean Power Research Lowering Solar Soft Costs by Bringing Interconnection Processes Online</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/clean-power-research-lowering-solar-soft-costs-bringing-interconnection-processes-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minister Obuchi Quits, + Japan Feed-In Tariff &amp; Energy Update (In Depth)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/minister-obuchi-quits-japan-feed-tariff-energy-update-depth/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/minister-obuchi-quits-japan-feed-tariff-energy-update-depth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Film Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASEAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atsuhiko Hirano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bottom-fixed turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chubu Electric Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electricity price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric rate hike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existing infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feed-in tariff review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floating Solar Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floating turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floating wind turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima nuclear complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid approvals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid connection issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higashihira Pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hisayo Takada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hokkaido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honshu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyogo Prefecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inherent monopoly of utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Renewable Energy Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan-Australia Economic Partnership Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Wind Power Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kagoshima Prefecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kato City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenji Yamaji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyocera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyushu Electric Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[METI committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mika Ohbayashi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Sakurajima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nishihira Pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Regulation Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Okinawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdated grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Arcadia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyroclastic flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Whitlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sendai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sendai reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Setouchi City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shikoku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shinzo Abe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar deployment in Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar feed-in-tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taisei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takeo Hiranuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEPCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin-film solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tohoku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshitsugu Fujii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yokohama Smart City Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yuko Obuchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero net energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>March 2011—when the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami devastated four reactors and endangered two others at Fukushima 1—forced a radical rethinking of Japan’s energy picture that continues today with a Japan feed-in tariff program. In the latest round, the utilities are pushing back against the feed-in tariffs and the fruitful development of solar power. To review, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/minister-obuchi-quits-japan-feed-tariff-energy-update-depth/">Minister Obuchi Quits, + Japan Feed-In Tariff &#038; Energy Update (In Depth)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/minister-obuchi-quits-japan-feed-tariff-energy-update-depth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s 21st Century Dilemma: Development and Carbon Emissions</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/chinas-21st-century-dilemma-development-carbon-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/chinas-21st-century-dilemma-development-carbon-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon efficiency Chinese provinces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pledges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china co2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2-emitting industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-fired electric power generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dabo Guan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission-intensive processed materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions-intensive capital project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal smelting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School of International Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of east anglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Leeds Economic and Social Research Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” That’s the paradox gripping China, the world’s most populous nation. A new seven-year study by researchers from the University of East Anglia relates China’s carbon dioxide emissions to the country’s accelerating economic growth. The results, published today in Nature Climate Change, illustrate the dilemma of development and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/chinas-21st-century-dilemma-development-carbon-emissions/">China’s 21st Century Dilemma: Development and Carbon Emissions</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/chinas-21st-century-dilemma-development-carbon-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Utilities Don&#8217;t Invest More In Solar (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/utilities-dont-invest-solar-video/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/utilities-dont-invest-solar-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Younicos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The threat solar power poses to utilities has been discussed time and time again. In the US, the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) &#8212; the association that represents US investor-owned electric companies &#8212; has even warned its constituents about the potential &#8220;utility death spiral&#8221; that could come from solar and energy storage. But then the question rises: &#8220;So, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/utilities-dont-invest-solar-video/">Why Utilities Don&#8217;t Invest More In Solar (VIDEO)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/utilities-dont-invest-solar-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Only Grid-Independent Village In The World?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/grid-independent-village-world-feldheim/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/grid-independent-village-world-feldheim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdfunding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100 % Renewable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100% renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100% renewable energy grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100% renewable energy village]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e.on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feldheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A little village in Germany, Feldheim, claims to be the only 100% grid-independent village in the world. It is a rural community that switched to renewables for financial reasons, but is now visited by&#160;thousands and thousands of people. The tour guide who showed us around noted that his most interesting group was when he had </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/grid-independent-village-world-feldheim/">The Only Grid-Independent Village In The World?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/02/grid-independent-village-world-feldheim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Utility Solar Charge Bites The Dust</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/another-utility-solar-charge-bites-dust/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/another-utility-solar-charge-bites-dust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hills Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hills Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Solar Love. Black Hills Power was considering a special demand rate for all renewable energy customers instead of&#160;a reward for installing solar panels that help with grid security, grid reliability, energy independence, the environment, and public health. The idea for the charges didn&#8217;t make customers happy, however. As such, the solar charge&#160;was withdrawn by the&#160;South </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/another-utility-solar-charge-bites-dust/">Another Utility Solar Charge Bites The Dust</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/another-utility-solar-charge-bites-dust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both Red &amp; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative utility revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer market incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Reicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed power systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE State Energy Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings Performance Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient building code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal grant program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Schulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratories of democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Bill Repayment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onsite clean power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RETs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Clean Energy Cookbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steyer-Taylor Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Force on Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-variant pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bingaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Congress squelching innovation in Washington, we need to look to the states for policies green on energy. A study released by Stanford University and the Hoover Institution this week (The State Clean Energy Cookbook: A Dozen Recipes for State Action on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) cites 12 innovative projects being implemented by almost 20 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/">Both Red &#038; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Solar Panel Production To Double, Big Corporations Going Solar&#8230; (Solar News)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/history-of-solar-solar-news/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/history-of-solar-solar-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kohl's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kohl's solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar trade war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPS solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us china solar trade war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>More solar news for you solar lovers: Chinese solar panel production is projected to double by 2017. (sustainablog) Apple, Verizon, Google, UPS, Walmart, Kohl&#8217;s, IKEA, GM&#8230; there are a lot of big corporations investing in solar now. Remember, corporations are primarily aimed at financial profits. Put 1 and 1 together. (Solar Love) Hawaii is aiming to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/history-of-solar-solar-news/">Chinese Solar Panel Production To Double, Big Corporations Going Solar&#8230; (Solar News)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/history-of-solar-solar-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Blindly Buy Cars From Auto Dealers?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/blindly-buy-cars-auto-dealers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/blindly-buy-cars-auto-dealers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cost of Solar. We all like to think of ourselves as rational people, but the fact of the matter is that we all make economic decisions that are not rational at all. But many of these decisions are so common or engrained in our way of life that we don’t even realize it. Consider this: </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/blindly-buy-cars-auto-dealers/">Do You Blindly Buy Cars From Auto Dealers?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/09/blindly-buy-cars-auto-dealers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
