<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; solar power benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/solar-power-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Subsidies Article in Wall Street Journal Misses The Beat</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/25/solar-subsidies-article-wall-street-journal-misses-beat/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/25/solar-subsidies-article-wall-street-journal-misses-beat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=56894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Cost of Solar. Generally speaking, reading and debunking horrible clean energy or electric vehicle stories in the mainstream media is not something I enjoy doing. But someone has to do it, and since I&#8217;ve been studying cleantech in depth for several years now and am in the blogging business, that someone seems </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/25/solar-subsidies-article-wall-street-journal-misses-beat/">Solar Subsidies Article in Wall Street Journal Misses The Beat</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/25/solar-subsidies-article-wall-street-journal-misses-beat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distributed Solar PV Benefits &amp; Costs</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/27/distirbuted-solar-pv-benefits-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/27/distirbuted-solar-pv-benefits-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed solar costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocky mountain institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article first appeared on Solar Love. The Rocky Mountain Institute&#8217;s eLab has created a new report on solar power benefits and costs (distributed solar PV benefits and costs, to be specific). This is a critical effort, and a very useful report to help that effort along. Better valuation of distributed solar PV (DPV) is sorely </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/27/distirbuted-solar-pv-benefits-costs/">Distributed Solar PV Benefits &#038; Costs</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/27/distirbuted-solar-pv-benefits-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a long post on the idea of using a &#8220;value of solar&#8221; policy instead of various types of government incentives for solar. Much of that post was based on research conducted by Clean Power Research for Austin Energy &#8212; so that Austin Energy could implement a Value of Solar policy (which it </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/">The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>True Value of Solar Power</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/26/true-value-of-solar-power/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/26/true-value-of-solar-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits of solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits solar electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs solar electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levelized cost of electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levelized cost of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levelized cost of renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=28567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I wrote recently on the costs of wind power and how they compare to the costs of traditional forms of power like coal and nuclear when you take externalities and other subsidies into account. I was going to wait until I wrapped up our "comprehensive wind power page" to write on this topic for solar power, but a new report out from the Institute for Local Self Reliance pushed me into the topic a little early. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/26/true-value-of-solar-power/">True Value of Solar Power</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/26/true-value-of-solar-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
