<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Solar Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/solar-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Surprises In NREL State Study Of Where Solar Is Most Economical</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/22/surprises-nrel-state-study-solar-economical/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/22/surprises-nrel-state-study-solar-economical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowest solar prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net metering policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photovaltaic Solar Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Effect of State Policy Suites on the Development of Solar Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Solar Love. State by state, the effects of going solar are&#160;influenced by much&#160;more than how much the state naturally enjoys sunshine&#160;throughout the year. Going solar, according to new research by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory,&#160;might be a more&#160;beneficial economic energy choice in states one does not expect to see at the top </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/22/surprises-nrel-state-study-solar-economical/">Surprises In NREL State Study Of Where Solar Is Most Economical</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/22/surprises-nrel-state-study-solar-economical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NREL: Soft Costs Now Largest Piece Of Solar Installation Costs</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/12/12/nrel-soft-costs-now-largest-piece-solar-installation-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/12/12/nrel-soft-costs-now-largest-piece-solar-installation-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=60059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two reports published by the US Energy Department&#8217;s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) show that soft costs &#8212; such as financing and other non-hardware costs &#8212; now make up the largest section of solar installation costs, coming in at 64% of the total price for residential solar energy systems. The two reports &#8212; &#8220;Benchmarking Non-Hardware Balance-of-System </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/12/12/nrel-soft-costs-now-largest-piece-solar-installation-costs/">NREL: Soft Costs Now Largest Piece Of Solar Installation Costs</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/12/12/nrel-soft-costs-now-largest-piece-solar-installation-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soft Costs Make A Bigger Difference As Solar Gets Cheaper</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/soft-costs-make-a-bigger-difference-as-solar-gets-cheaper/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/soft-costs-make-a-bigger-difference-as-solar-gets-cheaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar interconnection costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar permitting costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar soft costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar soft costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week’s graphic on the impact of local permitting on the cost of solar power was a big hit, so here’s a follow-up on “soft costs,” the expenses in a solar installation (including permitting) that are not the solar module. The chart compares the soft costs in the US to Germany (thanks to LBNL’s analysis), </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/soft-costs-make-a-bigger-difference-as-solar-gets-cheaper/">Soft Costs Make A Bigger Difference As Solar Gets Cheaper</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/soft-costs-make-a-bigger-difference-as-solar-gets-cheaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Power&#8217;s Massive Price Drop (Graph)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/solar-powers-massive-price-drop-graph/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/solar-powers-massive-price-drop-graph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power price drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power price graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price graph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another excellent cleantech snack for some Friday Fun. Thanks again to an active CleanTechnica reader and commenter for passing it along: For more on solar power&#8217;s massive price drop and related stories, check out: Solar — A Disruptive Technology (Graph) Solar PV Module Prices Have Fallen 80% Since 2008, Wind Turbines 29% Solar #2 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/solar-powers-massive-price-drop-graph/">Solar Power&#8217;s Massive Price Drop (Graph)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/solar-powers-massive-price-drop-graph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar PV Module Prices Have Fallen 80% Since 2008, Wind Turbines 29%</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/06/solar-pv-module-prices-have-fallen-80-since-2008-wind-turbines-29/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/06/solar-pv-module-prices-have-fallen-80-since-2008-wind-turbines-29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy ministerial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy Ministerial Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Modules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbine price drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbine price trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbine prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know most of you have seen such graphs many times, but I can&#8217;t resist sharing another one every once in awhile. And the truth is, a lot of people are completely oblivious to this. Those who follow cleantech news know the strong trend, but the common person certainly doesn&#8217;t. Do everyone a favor &#8212; </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/06/solar-pv-module-prices-have-fallen-80-since-2008-wind-turbines-29/">Solar PV Module Prices Have Fallen 80% Since 2008, Wind Turbines 29%</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/06/solar-pv-module-prices-have-fallen-80-since-2008-wind-turbines-29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment In Renewable Energy Set To Triple By 2030, Costs Plunging</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/23/investment-in-renewable-energy-set-to-triple-by-2030-costs-plunging/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/23/investment-in-renewable-energy-set-to-triple-by-2030-costs-plunging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg New Energy Finance summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article originally appeared on RenewEconomy. By Sophie Vorrath Global annual investment in renewable energy is set to grow by anywhere from two-and-a-half times to more than four-and-a-half times between now and 2030, leading to a future energy mix that would see renewables accounting for between 69&#8211;74 per cent of new power capacity added by 2030 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/23/investment-in-renewable-energy-set-to-triple-by-2030-costs-plunging/">Investment In Renewable Energy Set To Triple By 2030, Costs Plunging</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/23/investment-in-renewable-energy-set-to-triple-by-2030-costs-plunging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar &amp; Wind Cutting Fossil Fuels Off At The Kneecaps In Coming Years In Australia</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/24/solar-wind-cutting-fossil-fuels-off-at-the-kneecaps-in-coming-years-in-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/24/solar-wind-cutting-fossil-fuels-off-at-the-kneecaps-in-coming-years-in-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles Parkinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Coal Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia LCOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Natural Gas Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Solar Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Wind Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of wind Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article was originally published on RenewEconomy: The story that has really captured the imagination of our readers this year has been on the Bloomberg New Energy Finance analysis that demonstrated that wind energy was already cheaper than new coal and gas plants in Australia, and solar PV was not all that behind. Because of that interest, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/24/solar-wind-cutting-fossil-fuels-off-at-the-kneecaps-in-coming-years-in-australia/">Solar &#038; Wind Cutting Fossil Fuels Off At The Kneecaps In Coming Years In Australia</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/24/solar-wind-cutting-fossil-fuels-off-at-the-kneecaps-in-coming-years-in-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a long post on the idea of using a &#8220;value of solar&#8221; policy instead of various types of government incentives for solar. Much of that post was based on research conducted by Clean Power Research for Austin Energy &#8212; so that Austin Energy could implement a Value of Solar policy (which it </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/">The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Solar, Wind, Energy Efficiency, Geothermal, &amp; EV Charts &amp; Graphs From Bloomberg New Energy Finance</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/09/7-solar-wind-energy-efficiency-geothermal-ev-charts-graphs-from-bloomberg-new-energy-finance/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/09/7-solar-wind-energy-efficiency-geothermal-ev-charts-graphs-from-bloomberg-new-energy-finance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 emissions reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy co2 emissions reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy co2 emissions reductions us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV sales 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid EV sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid sales 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of wind power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar lcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US CO2 emissions reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US commercial energy efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>About a week ago, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) released the Sustainable Energy in America 2013 Factbook (a report commissioned by the Business Council for Sustainable Energy). At the press conference, Rhone Resch, President and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), Dave McCurdy, President and CEO of the American Gas Association, and Ethan Zindler, Head of Policy Analysis at </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/09/7-solar-wind-energy-efficiency-geothermal-ev-charts-graphs-from-bloomberg-new-energy-finance/">7 Solar, Wind, Energy Efficiency, Geothermal, &#038; EV Charts &#038; Graphs From Bloomberg New Energy Finance</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/09/7-solar-wind-energy-efficiency-geothermal-ev-charts-graphs-from-bloomberg-new-energy-finance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V3Solar Spin Cell = 8 Cents/kWh? (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/24/v3solar-spin-cell-cones-cheap-solar/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/24/v3solar-spin-cell-cones-cheap-solar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Rever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPV Cool Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCOE Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Spin Cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solarphasec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin Cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Quite frankly, if the company&#8217;s numbers are correct, this could be some big solar news. (CleanTechnica got the inside scoop due to our sincere &#8220;passion&#8221; for helping the world, and probably also our status as the top cleantech or clean energy site in the world.) The key will be whether or not the technology performs </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/24/v3solar-spin-cell-cones-cheap-solar/">V3Solar Spin Cell = 8 Cents/kWh? (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/24/v3solar-spin-cell-cones-cheap-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Solar Imports Drop But Prices Continue To Fall</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/22/chinese-solar-imports-drop-but-prices-continue-to-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/22/chinese-solar-imports-drop-but-prices-continue-to-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CASM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china solar imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese solar imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition for American Solar Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar international trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price drops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking the sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US China solar trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us china solar trade war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>US imports of silicon solar panels from China have dropped significantly this year with the imposition of unfair trade duties, but PV prices continued to their seemingly inexorable decline</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/22/chinese-solar-imports-drop-but-prices-continue-to-fall/">Chinese Solar Imports Drop But Prices Continue To Fall</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/22/chinese-solar-imports-drop-but-prices-continue-to-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Ready, Utilities: Solar Is Coming</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/10/get-ready-utilities-solar-is-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/10/get-ready-utilities-solar-is-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Quick question. Your state has good sunshine, lots of open rooftops, and the cost of solar energy has been falling by 10% per year. Do you think it will take 13 years to double the 10 megawatts (MW) of installed solar power? Yes, if you’re the largest corporate utility in my state, and willfully </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/10/get-ready-utilities-solar-is-coming/">Get Ready, Utilities: Solar Is Coming</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/10/get-ready-utilities-solar-is-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NREL Teams with Berkeley Lab to Analyze Solar Pricing Trends and Benchmark “Soft” Costs for PV Systems</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/04/nrel-teams-with-berkeley-lab-to-analyze-solar-pricing-trends-and-benchmark-soft-costs-for-pv-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/04/nrel-teams-with-berkeley-lab-to-analyze-solar-pricing-trends-and-benchmark-soft-costs-for-pv-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lbl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar soft costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunShot Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking the sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Downward pricing for solar projected to continue; soft costs made up 40-50 percent of residential and commercial PV prices in 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s (DOE)’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBL) jointly released two reports examining solar photovoltaic (PV) pricing in the U.S. The first report, Photovoltaic (PV) </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/04/nrel-teams-with-berkeley-lab-to-analyze-solar-pricing-trends-and-benchmark-soft-costs-for-pv-systems/">NREL Teams with Berkeley Lab to Analyze Solar Pricing Trends and Benchmark “Soft” Costs for PV Systems</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/04/nrel-teams-with-berkeley-lab-to-analyze-solar-pricing-trends-and-benchmark-soft-costs-for-pv-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do We Lower Solar Installation Costs And Open The Market To Securitized Portfolios: Standardize And Harmonize</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/14/how-do-we-lower-solar-installation-costs-and-open-the-market-to-securitized-portfolios-standardize-and-harmonize/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/14/how-do-we-lower-solar-installation-costs-and-open-the-market-to-securitized-portfolios-standardize-and-harmonize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowering solar costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowering solar panel costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowering solar pv costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar standardization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Soft costs can be pretty tough. The cost of solar installations can be generally separated into "hard" costs — representing primary components such as modules, racking, inverters — and soft costs including legal, permitting, and financing. While the former group — particularly modules — have dropped dramatically over the last several years, the latter have not. According to a recent NREL analysis, these costs represent roughly 30% of both residential and utility installations (slightly less for commercial-host systems). See Figure 1. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/14/how-do-we-lower-solar-installation-costs-and-open-the-market-to-securitized-portfolios-standardize-and-harmonize/">How Do We Lower Solar Installation Costs And Open The Market To Securitized Portfolios: Standardize And Harmonize</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/14/how-do-we-lower-solar-installation-costs-and-open-the-market-to-securitized-portfolios-standardize-and-harmonize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residential Solar Lease vs Solar Ownership</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/23/residential-solar-lease-vs-solar-ownership/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/23/residential-solar-lease-vs-solar-ownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[going solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home solar costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ithaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ithaca solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar leasing vs buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar leasing vs ownership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; If you&#8217;re in one of the larger solar markets in the country (California, New Jersey, etc) then &#8220;going solar&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean going it alone. You can likely get a &#8220;zero money down&#8221; lease or some similar financing tool to reduce the upfront cost. But is it worthwhile? The following analysis, done for a friend </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/23/residential-solar-lease-vs-solar-ownership/">Residential Solar Lease vs Solar Ownership</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/23/residential-solar-lease-vs-solar-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ongoing Sharp Drop in Solar PV Cost Overlooked Amidst Trade Wars &amp; Insolvencies</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/16/ongoing-sharp-drops-in-solar-pv-cost-overlooked-amidst-price-trade-wars-insolvencies/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/16/ongoing-sharp-drops-in-solar-pv-cost-overlooked-amidst-price-trade-wars-insolvencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arkx clean energy fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arkx investment management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deutsche bank clean technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV manufacturing costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power commercial vessels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar trade wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility-scale solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vishal shah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Solar PV manufacturing and overall costs continue to fall sharply, but that's being overlooked as the media focuses on solar trade wars, price wars, scandals and insolvencies</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/16/ongoing-sharp-drops-in-solar-pv-cost-overlooked-amidst-price-trade-wars-insolvencies/">Ongoing Sharp Drop in Solar PV Cost Overlooked Amidst Trade Wars &#038; Insolvencies</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/16/ongoing-sharp-drops-in-solar-pv-cost-overlooked-amidst-price-trade-wars-insolvencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar PV Close to 50c/Watt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/solar-pv-close-to-50cwatt/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/solar-pv-close-to-50cwatt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles Parkinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTM Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV cost forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV costs dropping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; US Energy Secretary Stephen Chu earlier this year suggested that solar PV without subsidies will be cheaper than both coal and gas if it could get its costs down to around $1/watt by the end of the decade – an event that would trigger a total re-examination of the way electricity was produced in the world’s </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/solar-pv-close-to-50cwatt/">Solar PV Close to 50c/Watt</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/solar-pv-close-to-50cwatt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Solar Myths Busted (Infographic)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/19/5-solar-myths-busted-infographic/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/19/5-solar-myths-busted-infographic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar fossil fuel costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar getting cheaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; One of the good folks at PV Magazine recently dropped me a note about a cool new solar infographic the team there created. While I generally love to share a decent solar infographic, this one created by folks focused on the industry every day is better than most, as it bust 5 common myths </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/19/5-solar-myths-busted-infographic/">5 Solar Myths Busted (Infographic)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/19/5-solar-myths-busted-infographic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar in the US: Policy &amp; Promise (+ 9 More Solar Charts &amp; Images)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/14/solar-in-the-us-policy-promise-9-more-solar-charts-images/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/14/solar-in-the-us-policy-promise-9-more-solar-charts-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar alternative financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar cost drops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar manufacturing US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel price drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power growth projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar ppas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price drops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar tax equity financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Market Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Market Insight 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Market Insight report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Market Insight report Q1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; I was on a conference call yesterday with Tom Kimbis, Vice President of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), and Shayle Kann, Vice President of Research at GTM Research. The conference call was for the announcement of the latest US Solar Market Insight report (for Q1 2012), which Josh had a great summary of earlier this morning (link above). </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/14/solar-in-the-us-policy-promise-9-more-solar-charts-images/">Solar in the US: Policy &#038; Promise (+ 9 More Solar Charts &#038; Images)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/14/solar-in-the-us-policy-promise-9-more-solar-charts-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.seia.org/media/Solar_Market_Insight_Q1_2012_Report_Press_Teleconference_6.13.12.mp3" length="10570971" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan: Ignorance and/or Dishonesty of “Energy Experts”</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/11/japan-ignorance-andor-dishonesty-of-energy-experts/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/11/japan-ignorance-andor-dishonesty-of-energy-experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Gerke]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Since the tragic and ongoing nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power plant began, Japan has been plunged into an intense energy policy debate. Currently, the main focus is on the struggle about whether or not to restart two nuclear reactors at the Ōi Nuclear Power Plant, which has a combined capacity of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/11/japan-ignorance-andor-dishonesty-of-energy-experts/">Japan: Ignorance and/or Dishonesty of “Energy Experts”</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/11/japan-ignorance-andor-dishonesty-of-energy-experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
