<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; rooftop solar mandates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/rooftop-solar-mandates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Mandate Approved By Sebastopol, California</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/22/solar-mandate-approved-by-sebastopol-california/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/22/solar-mandate-approved-by-sebastopol-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Brown]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California solar mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lancaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop solar mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop solar mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastapol solar requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sebastopol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastopol rooftop solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastopol rooftop solar requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastopol solar mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastopol solar requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Sonoma County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are many ways to go solar, and they all haven&#8217;t yet been tried &#8212; people are continually coming up with new ideas. But there are now some options that are so good that cities are beginning to mandate solar power with all new homes. The latest such city (of which we know) is Sebastopol, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/22/solar-mandate-approved-by-sebastopol-california/">Solar Mandate Approved By Sebastopol, California</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/22/solar-mandate-approved-by-sebastopol-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancaster&#8217;s New Home Solar Mandate Helps Prove Solar Is Attractive To Conservatives</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/09/lancasters-solar-mandate-on-new-homes-helps-prove-solar-is-attractive-to-conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/09/lancasters-solar-mandate-on-new-homes-helps-prove-solar-is-attractive-to-conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lancaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster solar city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster solar law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster solar mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Parris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop solar mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar mandates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 4, we wrote about Lancaster&#8217;s requirement that all new single-family homes have solar panels installed on them. So we skipped covering the confirmation of that when the City Council of Lancaster (CA) made it official on March 26. However, I&#8217;ve decided to come back to it for one important reason. As reported previously, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/09/lancasters-solar-mandate-on-new-homes-helps-prove-solar-is-attractive-to-conservatives/">Lancaster&#8217;s New Home Solar Mandate Helps Prove Solar Is Attractive To Conservatives</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/09/lancasters-solar-mandate-on-new-homes-helps-prove-solar-is-attractive-to-conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Power Required On Every New Home &#8212; Pioneering Requirement From Lancaster, California</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/04/solar-power-required-on-every-new-home-pioneering-requirement-from-lancaster-california/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/04/solar-power-required-on-every-new-home-pioneering-requirement-from-lancaster-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ayre]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster California solar energy new homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster California sole energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayor Rex Parris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayor Rex Parris solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new buildings solar required]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican solar energy support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[required solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop solar mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar energy new buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar mandates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A first-of-its-kind requirement for solar power systems is going to be implemented in Lancaster, California. The requirement is that solar power systems be installed on all new single-family homes within the city. Furthermore, this announcement comes from a Republican mayor. All newly-built single-family homes within Lancaster will be required to feature solar power systems starting </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/04/solar-power-required-on-every-new-home-pioneering-requirement-from-lancaster-california/">Solar Power Required On Every New Home &#8212; Pioneering Requirement From Lancaster, California</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/04/solar-power-required-on-every-new-home-pioneering-requirement-from-lancaster-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
