<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; property tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/property-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>California’s Reserve Fund Won’t Lift The FHFA Boot From PACE’s Neck</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/19/californias-reserve-fund-wont-lift-fhfa-boot-paces-neck/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/19/californias-reserve-fund-wont-lift-fhfa-boot-paces-neck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on ilsr.org. Earlier this year, the state of California announced a $10 million loan-loss reserve to solve the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s severe restrictions on using property-tax based financing for energy efficiency and renewable energy on residential property. It’s a great concept, but evidence from on of California’s best property assessed clean energy (PACE) </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/19/californias-reserve-fund-wont-lift-fhfa-boot-paces-neck/">California’s Reserve Fund Won’t Lift The FHFA Boot From PACE’s Neck</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/19/californias-reserve-fund-wont-lift-fhfa-boot-paces-neck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
