<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; PG&amp;E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/pge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>EPA Approves The VIA eREV Van</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/25/epa-approves-via-erev-van/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/25/epa-approves-via-erev-van/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Lutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EREV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Acedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Via Motors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EVObsession. Last week Bob Lutz’s plug-in truck maker VIA Motors received certification for sale from the EPA for its eREV van. VIA’s plug-in hybrid vans are now cleared for sale across the country, allowing its Mexican factory to begin production in earnest. While VIA Motors has a few demonstration fleets out to companies </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/25/epa-approves-via-erev-van/">EPA Approves The VIA eREV Van</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/25/epa-approves-via-erev-van/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Practicum Warns AB 2145 Might Render CCAs Ineffective</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermosa Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA Practicum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the Eco Report Every year, fourth-year students from UCLA’s B.S. Environmental Science Program do a practicum with outside partners, and this year’s project explored ways to decarbonize the electricity supply for the city of Hermosa Beach. The students recommended forming a community choice aggregate (CCA), depending on what the California legislature does, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/">UCLA Practicum Warns AB 2145 Might Render CCAs Ineffective</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E Answers Questions about Community Choice Aggregation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoma Clean Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the ECOreport Some call California&#8217;s Assembly Bill 2145 &#8220;the Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; or a &#8220;CCA killer.&#8221; They believe that it was designed to protect large utilities like Pacific Gas &#38; Electric (PG&#38;E) from communities that would prefer to form their own utilities (CCA). The origins of this story go back a few </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/">PG&#038;E Answers Questions about Community Choice Aggregation</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Assembly Duped Badly Regarding Community Choice Aggregation Bill</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Environmental Hero Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Muratsuchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOHICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Hoffa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhattan Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MB2025 Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sona Kalapura Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoma Clean Power Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA Luskin report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Creative Greenius. This political primary season just keeps getting weirder and weirder. Imagine my surprise on Friday afternoon when my cell phone rang and it was Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi on the line calling to tell me he had made a big mistake and that he was sorry. He wanted me to know </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/">California Assembly Duped Badly Regarding Community Choice Aggregation Bill</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Utility Monopoly Power Grab of 2014&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/utility-monopoly-power-grab-2014/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/utility-monopoly-power-grab-2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 18:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published by the ECOreport.  The California legislature passed AB 2145 by a 51-15 vote. A broad and diverse coalition of business, local government, community and environmental organizations have decried the California Assembly’s passage of what they are calling the ‘Utility Monopoly Power Grab of 2014.’ This fight is not over. This legislation has now proceeded </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/utility-monopoly-power-grab-2014/">The &#8220;Utility Monopoly Power Grab of 2014&#8243;</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/utility-monopoly-power-grab-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Pacific Gas &amp; Electric Making A Mockery Of SB 709?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/23/pacific-gas-electric-making-mockery-sb-709/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/23/pacific-gas-electric-making-mockery-sb-709/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanPowerSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 709]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoma Clean Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the ECOreport. California Senate Bill 790 (SB 790) bans utility companies from using ratepayer funds for negative publicity campaigns against local community utilities ( community choice aggregators, or CCA). They are now required to file the details of any anti-CCA marketing with the California Public Utilities Commission. Only PG&#38;E has not filed in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/23/pacific-gas-electric-making-mockery-sb-709/">Is Pacific Gas &#038; Electric Making A Mockery Of SB 709?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/23/pacific-gas-electric-making-mockery-sb-709/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Solar Utilities</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/top-10-solar-utilities/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/top-10-solar-utilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 08:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Markham]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Public Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy Carolinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaiian Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imperial Irrigation District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kauai Island Utility Cooperative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KIUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maui Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas and Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pse&g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Service Electric and Gas Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Gas and Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Electric Power Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sterling Municipal Light Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Cost Of Solar. When it comes to integrating solar power into the energy distribution system, the solar PV array that the homeowner or building owner installs is only one part of the equation, because the local electric utility company is a key component of this renewable energy revolution. Without participating utilities, home solar would </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/top-10-solar-utilities/">Top 10 Solar Utilities</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/top-10-solar-utilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act&#8221; Just A Revamp Of Prop 16?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published in the ECOreport. A member of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245, Hunter Stern, recently sent Marin County residents an email supporting state Assembly Bill 2145, popularly called the “Monopoly Protection Act.” According to the PACIFIC SUN, it is “filled with misinformation” – but the real problem is that it may </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/">Is California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act&#8221; Just A Revamp Of Prop 16?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Storage Scandal In California (In Depth)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/30/solar-storage-scandal-california-depth/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/30/solar-storage-scandal-california-depth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the ECOreport. SolarCity spokesperson Will Craven said that about 500 of their California customers have agreed to install batteries for power storage, but the state’s three biggest utilities have only connected 12 since 2011. He decided to go to the press after Southern California Edison (SCE) said they were going to charge </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/30/solar-storage-scandal-california-depth/">Solar Storage Scandal In California (In Depth)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/30/solar-storage-scandal-california-depth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of The Cleantech Industry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/11/state-cleantech-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/11/state-cleantech-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2514]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARPA-E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleantech VCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IOUs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US cleantech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=62494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Maud Texier Where does cleantech stand? After a big boom in early stage investments and a green policies kick-off a few years ago, the cleantech industry has been through the struggles that always come with a young and maturing industry. Where are we standing now? Unavoidable growing pains Back in 2008, VC funds for </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/11/state-cleantech-industry/">The State Of The Cleantech Industry</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/11/state-cleantech-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Passes 600MW Shared Renewables Program</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/12/california-passes-600mw-shared-renewables-program/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/12/california-passes-600mw-shared-renewables-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California shared renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lois wolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas & Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Gas & Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shared Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=56365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>California's state legislature has passed the landmark 600MW "shared renewables" bill that will open up access to clean energy to millions of residents who can't install their own renewables - with no state subsidy and no extra ratepayer costs</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/12/california-passes-600mw-shared-renewables-program/">California Passes 600MW Shared Renewables Program</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/12/california-passes-600mw-shared-renewables-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personalized Office Comfort System Could Save 30% In Building Energy Costs</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/03/personalized-office-comfort-system-could-save-30-in-building-energy-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/03/personalized-office-comfort-system-could-save-30-in-building-energy-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Brown]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Energy Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Institute for Energy and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for the Built Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Culler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Arens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Excellence Energy Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas and Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perkins + Will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Comfort System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California Berkeley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At the Center for the Built Environment (CBE), researchers at the University of California, Berkeley (often called UC Berkeley) have developed a Personal Comfort System (PCS) designed to cool and heat the parts of the body which are most &#8220;thermally sensitive.&#8221; This was done with the assistance of a $1.6 million grant from the California </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/03/personalized-office-comfort-system-could-save-30-in-building-energy-costs/">Personalized Office Comfort System Could Save 30% In Building Energy Costs</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/03/personalized-office-comfort-system-could-save-30-in-building-energy-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battery Backup Has An Incentive In California</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/battery-backup-has-an-incentive-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/battery-backup-has-an-incentive-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Self-Generation Incentive Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy storage California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most early adopters of solar PV systems originally had the hopes of having power even if the grid went down with a power outage, only to find out that was not how things worked with grid-tied solar PV systems &#8212; if the grid went down, electricity from their PV system was also unavailable. But now </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/battery-backup-has-an-incentive-in-california/">Battery Backup Has An Incentive In California</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/battery-backup-has-an-incentive-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIA Motors Team With PG&amp;E To Power Stricken Neighbourhoods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/02/via-motors-team-with-pge-to-power-stricken-neighbourhoods/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/02/via-motors-team-with-pge-to-power-stricken-neighbourhoods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel generator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green truck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article was originally published on Gas2 by Christopher DeMorro Events like Hurricane Sandy have shown just how fragile our power grid has become. Deploying fuel-intensive diesel generators can be all but impossible when roads are impassable, but green truck builder VIA is teaming up with energy company PG&#38;E to test pickup trucks with the </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/02/via-motors-team-with-pge-to-power-stricken-neighbourhoods/">VIA Motors Team With PG&#038;E To Power Stricken Neighbourhoods</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/02/via-motors-team-with-pge-to-power-stricken-neighbourhoods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Solar Initiative Shines With 391MW-Installed Record Year</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/11/california-solar-initiative-shines-with-391mw-record-year/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/11/california-solar-initiative-shines-with-391mw-record-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california rooftop solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california virtual net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas and Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Gas & Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Solar Initiative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Solar Initiative installed a record 391MW of new solar on utility customer rooftops in 2012. The program has now installed 1,629MW of rooftop solar, enough to power 150,000 homes, and is years ahead of program target goals</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/11/california-solar-initiative-shines-with-391mw-record-year/">California Solar Initiative Shines With 391MW-Installed Record Year</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/11/california-solar-initiative-shines-with-391mw-record-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E Unveils Battery Storage System In San Jose, California</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/pge-unveils-battery-storage-system-in-san-jose-california/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/pge-unveils-battery-storage-system-in-san-jose-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Energy Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California energy storage pilot project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California pilot project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E energy storage pilot project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&C Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium-sulfur batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium-sulfur battery energy storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The grid storage space is really starting to heat up. We&#8217;ve already featured a couple of promising-looking energy storage companies getting close to commercialization (and claiming to offer safe, reliable, nontoxic grid storage at very competitive prices). And we&#8217;ve got a handful of other companies and technologies we plan to highlight in the coming weeks. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/pge-unveils-battery-storage-system-in-san-jose-california/">PG&#038;E Unveils Battery Storage System In San Jose, California</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/24/pge-unveils-battery-storage-system-in-san-jose-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Largest Solar PV Facility In California Opens</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/07/largest-solar-pv-facility-in-california-opens/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/07/largest-solar-pv-facility-in-california-opens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Important Media Cross-Post]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpine Solar Generating Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpine Solar Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lancaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancaster solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRG Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRG Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think a day goes by when there isn&#8217;t another record broken in the solar industry. Here&#8217;s one of the latest, courtesy sister site Green Building Elements and Business Wire: NRG Energy, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary NRG Solar, announced that it will commemorate the opening of the Alpine Solar Generating Facility in Lancaster, Calif., </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/07/largest-solar-pv-facility-in-california-opens/">Largest Solar PV Facility In California Opens</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/07/largest-solar-pv-facility-in-california-opens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E&#8217;s Green Option Gives Customers Opportunity To Support Renewable Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/15/pges-green-option-gives-customers-opportunity-to-support-renewable-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/15/pges-green-option-gives-customers-opportunity-to-support-renewable-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas and Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&#38;E), one of the largest electric utilities in the United States, announced on Friday last week that it had reached an agreement to enhance its proposed &#8220;Green Option&#8221; to give electric customers an opportunity to support 100% renewable energy. PG&#38;E provided a revised proposal to the California Public Utilities Commission </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/15/pges-green-option-gives-customers-opportunity-to-support-renewable-energy/">PG&#038;E&#8217;s Green Option Gives Customers Opportunity To Support Renewable Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/15/pges-green-option-gives-customers-opportunity-to-support-renewable-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antelope Valley Solar Ranch One Achieves 100 Megawatt Milestone</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/22/antelope-valley-solar-ranch-one-achieves-100-megawatt-milestone/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/22/antelope-valley-solar-ranch-one-achieves-100-megawatt-milestone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antelope Valley Solar Ranch One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas and Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First Solar announced Wednesday that its Antelope Valley Solar Ranch One has achieved a peak generating capacity of 100 megawatts (MW) connected to the electrical grid. But that&#8217;s only half of the end goal. When construction is completed later this year, the ranch, located in northern Los Angeles County, will have a generating capacity of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/22/antelope-valley-solar-ranch-one-achieves-100-megawatt-milestone/">Antelope Valley Solar Ranch One Achieves 100 Megawatt Milestone</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/22/antelope-valley-solar-ranch-one-achieves-100-megawatt-milestone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a long post on the idea of using a &#8220;value of solar&#8221; policy instead of various types of government incentives for solar. Much of that post was based on research conducted by Clean Power Research for Austin Energy &#8212; so that Austin Energy could implement a Value of Solar policy (which it </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/">The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
