<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Pennsylvania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Governor Cuomo Announces Statewide New York Fracking Ban</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/18/governor-cuomo-announces-statewide-new-york-fracking-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/18/governor-cuomo-announces-statewide-new-york-fracking-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denton TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dryden NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Zucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Martens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mora County NM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Corbett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunisia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday (Wednesday, December 17, 2014), at a year-end cabinet meeting in Albany called by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, New York’s acting commissioner of health stated that he could not support high-volume New York fracking (technically, hydraulic fracturing) because the health issues of the practice outweigh the benefits. [If there is anyone out there who’s unaware of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/18/governor-cuomo-announces-statewide-new-york-fracking-ban/">Governor Cuomo Announces Statewide New York Fracking Ban</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/18/governor-cuomo-announces-statewide-new-york-fracking-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>North America's carbon markets just completed the first international cap-and-trade system linkage and raised $500 million for clean energy investment</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/">Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both Red &amp; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative utility revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer market incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Reicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed power systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE State Energy Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings Performance Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient building code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal grant program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Schulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratories of democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Bill Repayment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onsite clean power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RETs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Clean Energy Cookbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steyer-Taylor Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Force on Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-variant pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bingaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Congress squelching innovation in Washington, we need to look to the states for policies green on energy. A study released by Stanford University and the Hoover Institution this week (The State Clean Energy Cookbook: A Dozen Recipes for State Action on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) cites 12 innovative projects being implemented by almost 20 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/">Both Red &#038; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electric Vehicle News: Tesla in Pennsylvania, New BYD Batteries&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/16/electric-vehicle-news-tesla-pennsylvania-new-byd-batteries/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/16/electric-vehicle-news-tesla-pennsylvania-new-byd-batteries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging Stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BYD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[byd batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California EV rebates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California EV rebates low income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california evs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charge Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevy Volt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel cell vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium-manganese-iron-phosphate batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Drive Electric Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon EVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla carbon fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla Supercharger Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla superchargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Time for another electric vehicle news roundup. Enjoy! Tesla Motors Pennsylvania has approved 5 Tesla galleries, and existing one and 4 more. (EV Obsession) Tesla trumps Toyota&#8217;s fuel cell vehicle efforts, big time. This is Part II in a series on that. (Climate Progress) How do you build a Supercharger station anyway? Have a look. (Teslarati) </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/16/electric-vehicle-news-tesla-pennsylvania-new-byd-batteries/">Electric Vehicle News: Tesla in Pennsylvania, New BYD Batteries&#8230;</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/16/electric-vehicle-news-tesla-pennsylvania-new-byd-batteries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are VOSTs Needed To End Subsidies To Non-Solar Customers?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossborder Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rabago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Brian Orion Utilities across the country have been fighting to curtail net energy metering (NEM) programs in favor of value of solar tariff (VOST) programs, claiming that NEM results in a cost-shift to non-solar customers. However, NEM programs may actually undercompensate solar customers for the true value their systems provide, resulting in a substantial </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/">Are VOSTs Needed To End Subsidies To Non-Solar Customers?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 New Energy Maps Show A Lot About Renewables</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachian ridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covanta Essex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Mapping System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Mapping System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Climate Central  By Bobby Magill When the U.S. Energy Information Administration launched its new U.S. Energy Mapping System last fall and upgraded it for use on mobile devices in early June, it powered a system allowing anyone to visualize some of the reams of data the EIA compiles on all things energy-related in the country. That mapping system has a </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/">4 New Energy Maps Show A Lot About Renewables</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save Americans $37.4 Billion</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRDC]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advancement of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Lashof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICF International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Climate Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextGen Climate America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the website of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Many key states will benefit from climate action: AR, CO, FL, IA, IL, MI, MO, MN, NC, NV, OH, PA, and VA The first-ever limits on carbon pollution from power plants can save American households and business customers $37.4 billion on their electric bills in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/">Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save Americans $37.4 Billion</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.hastingsgroupmedia.com/052914NRDCcarbonjobsbillsanalysis.mp3" length="13980259" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Clean Gas” More Dangerous Than Coal (VIDEOS)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/clean-gas-dangerous-coal-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/clean-gas-dangerous-coal-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 23:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America Ferrera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american legislative exchange council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Anthony Ingraffea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaby Petron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heartland institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Bittman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Boling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Brownback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwestern Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stand Your Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YEARS OF LIVING DANGEROUSLY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Planetsave. Turns out that just about everyone (including President Obama) has been hugely underestimating the methane pollution levels of so-called “clean gas.” The booming American economy now seems to come at a greater cost than we originally thought when we found out that natural gas produces only half as much carbon as </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/clean-gas-dangerous-coal-videos/">“Clean Gas” More Dangerous Than Coal (VIDEOS)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/26/clean-gas-dangerous-coal-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 Wind PPA Prices In US Interior Averaged 2.1 Cents/KWH (WINDPOWER 2014)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/08/2013-ppa-prices-us-interior-averaged-2-1-centskwh-windpower-2014-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/08/2013-ppa-prices-us-interior-averaged-2-1-centskwh-windpower-2014-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 19:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Barnard]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigant Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B&K Trucking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bp wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrinsik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lbnl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIDAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandalay Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Wiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SODAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tradewind New Energy Advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WINDPOWER 2014]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Energy &#38; Policy Institute. Las Vegas isn&#8217;t exactly a familiar haunt for me, but I&#8217;ve been here several times for conferences (and one wedding). I had seen the wine angel in the Mandalay Bay floating up in her harness beside the several story wine cellar a few years ago, but didn&#8217;t go </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/08/2013-ppa-prices-us-interior-averaged-2-1-centskwh-windpower-2014-part-2/">2013 Wind PPA Prices In US Interior Averaged 2.1 Cents/KWH (WINDPOWER 2014)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/08/2013-ppa-prices-us-interior-averaged-2-1-centskwh-windpower-2014-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas In New York Marcellus Shale Costs More To Get It Out Than The Gas Is Worth</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeSmog Blog]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben van Beurden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chesapeake energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft 2014 energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elisabeth Radow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fadel Gheit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[League of Women Voters of New York State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyndon Pittinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oppenheimer & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Tillerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volumetric Production Payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on DeSmogBlog. By Sharon Kelly For years, the shale industry has touted the economic benefits it can provide. An overflowing supply of domestic natural gas will help keep heating and electric bills low for American consumers, they argue, while drilling jobs and astounding royalty windfalls for landowners will reinvigorate local economies. These tantalizing promises have </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/">Natural Gas In New York Marcellus Shale Costs More To Get It Out Than The Gas Is Worth</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Methane Emissions Questions Gas Being ‘Bridge’ Fuel</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/19/methane-emissions-questions-gas-bridge-fuel/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/19/methane-emissions-questions-gas-bridge-fuel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Ingraffea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado’s Denver-Julesberg Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cornell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Caulton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David T. Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingraffea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purdue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shepson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Texas-Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah’s Uintah Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group III report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Climate Central. By Bobby Magill Natural gas as a means to produce electricity is being hailed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as the fuel that can act as a &#8220;bridge&#8221; between carbon-heavy coal and zero-carbon renewables, helping to reduce humans&#8217; impact on the climate. The idea is that burning natural gas involves fewer greenhouse </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/19/methane-emissions-questions-gas-bridge-fuel/">Methane Emissions Questions Gas Being ‘Bridge’ Fuel</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/19/methane-emissions-questions-gas-bridge-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Energy Policy Takes Important Step Forward US Senate</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AWEA]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(EXPIRE) Act of 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA’s Power of Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Cardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debbie Stabenow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXPIRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expiring Provisions Improvement Reform and Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Isakson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Crapo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Menendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherrod Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Carper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Viriginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Into the Wind. By Mary Kate Francis  Across the country, wind power supporters are thanking their legislators for taking an important step forward in the effort to extend the renewable energy Production Tax Credit (PTC). The Senate Finance Committee, whose members are listed below, approved a bill on Thursday, April 3, to extend </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/">Wind Energy Policy Takes Important Step Forward US Senate</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit Gets Important Last-Minute Push</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AWEA]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Cardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debbie Stabenow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Crapo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Carper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Kiernan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind PTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the AWEA website (image added). Washington, D.C., — The renewable energy Production Tax Credit (PTC) and Investment Tax Credit (ITC) were included today with bipartisan support, as the U.S. Senate Finance Committee reported out a tax extenders package whose swift passage is critically important to the continued growth of the U.S. wind </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/">Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit Gets Important Last-Minute Push</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EnergyTrends.org Ranks Renewable Energy Leaders</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/24/energytrends-org-ranks-renewable-energy-leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/24/energytrends-org-ranks-renewable-energy-leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnergyTrends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lisanne Boling, EnergyTrends.org Vermont, Pennsylvania and California ranked as the most friendly to renewable energy according to new rankings from EnergyTrends.org. EnergyTrends.org’s ranking system takes not only state policies into account but also energy consumption and generation data. Other factors considered include growth of renewable energy, state programs for renewable energy, and other factors. Bonus </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/24/energytrends-org-ranks-renewable-energy-leaders/">EnergyTrends.org Ranks Renewable Energy Leaders</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/24/energytrends-org-ranks-renewable-energy-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chevron Tries To Appease Victims With Pizzas After Explosion</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/19/chevron-tries-appease-victims-pizzas-explosion/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/19/chevron-tries-appease-victims-pizzas-explosion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo Borrás]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=62908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Gas2. Last week, residents of Bobtown, PA were awoken by a massive, fiery blast at the town’s Chevron-owned fracking well. The explosion is believed to have killed at least one person, with another worker injured and a number of area residents seriously, rightfully frightened by the blast. Chevron knew it had to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/19/chevron-tries-appease-victims-pizzas-explosion/">Chevron Tries To Appease Victims With Pizzas After Explosion</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/19/chevron-tries-appease-victims-pizzas-explosion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Looks To Double Its Renewable Energy Standard, For Real This Time</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/15/pennsylvania-looks-double-renewable-energy-standard-real-time/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/15/pennsylvania-looks-double-renewable-energy-standard-real-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daylin Leach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Vitali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published by ClimateProgress by Matt Kasper On Tuesday, Pennsylvania State Senator Daylin Leach (D-Montgomery/Delaware) joined State Representative Greg Vitali (D-Delaware) and environmental organizations at a press conference to unveil a bill that would increase the amount of renewable energy powering Pennsylvania homes and businesses by boosting the state’s Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS). Both the Senate </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/15/pennsylvania-looks-double-renewable-energy-standard-real-time/">Pennsylvania Looks To Double Its Renewable Energy Standard, For Real This Time</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/15/pennsylvania-looks-double-renewable-energy-standard-real-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philadelphia&#8217;s Temple University To Host 63kW Solar Plant</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/14/philadelphias-temple-university-host-63kw-solar-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/14/philadelphias-temple-university-host-63kw-solar-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Martin II]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temple university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temple University solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=57470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Temple University&#8217;s Edberg-Olson Hall will soon be home to a 63 kilowatt solar array on its south-facing roof, the school&#8217;s website reports. The plant will be built, owned, and maintained by Philadelphia-based Community Energy Inc. The power that the solar plant generates will be sold to the university at rates competitive with its regular electricity </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/14/philadelphias-temple-university-host-63kw-solar-plant/">Philadelphia&#8217;s Temple University To Host 63kW Solar Plant</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/14/philadelphias-temple-university-host-63kw-solar-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Metering Now Available In Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/net-metering-now-available-pennsylvania/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/net-metering-now-available-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PennFuture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PennFuture Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reinford Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=56990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the PennFuture Energy Center Website By Evan R. Endres If you look across the renewable energy landscape in the U.S., you&#8217;ll find that some of the nifty 50 have no distributed solar or wind at all. What&#8217;s going on? The answer is no net metering. You may also have noticed that Re: Energy has </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/net-metering-now-available-pennsylvania/">Net Metering Now Available In Pennsylvania</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/09/30/net-metering-now-available-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Map Guides Great Lakes Climate Change Adaptation Planning</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate resiliency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook County Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Scavia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flint Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Sustainability Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwaters Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York State climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The growing effects of climate change make adaptation more important every day, but without accurate data to guide planning, government action risks being ineffective or insufficient.</p>
<p>That’s where a new interactive map from the University of Michigan comes into the picture, combining economic, infrastructure, and population data for 225 counties in the Great Lakes region</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/">Online Map Guides Great Lakes Climate Change Adaptation Planning</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/15/online-map-guides-great-lakes-climate-change-adaptation-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$23 Million Energy Storage Research Center Launched In New York State</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/23-million-energy-storage-research-center-launched-in-new-york-state/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/23-million-energy-storage-research-center-launched-in-new-york-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flywheel Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNV Kema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empire State Development Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo van Nispen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York State energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY-BEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new $23-million dollar energy storage research and development center could reorient the future of this growing industry to New York State</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/23-million-energy-storage-research-center-launched-in-new-york-state/">$23 Million Energy Storage Research Center Launched In New York State</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/23-million-energy-storage-research-center-launched-in-new-york-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
