<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; north carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/north-carolina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>City Of Raleigh Made $27,000 Last Year Via Tickets For Cars Parked In A Single EV Charging Spot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/30/city-raleigh-made-27000-last-year-via-tickets-cars-parked-one-ev-charging-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/30/city-raleigh-made-27000-last-year-via-tickets-cars-parked-one-ev-charging-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ayre]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging Stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV only parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV parking spot fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICEing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The city of Raleigh in North Carolina made over $27,000 last year (the administrative year ending on November 30) via tickets for non-EV vehicles parked in a single EV charging spot located in the city, according to recent reports. Impressive. (Is that the right word?) Still, you feel a bit bad for those that got </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/30/city-raleigh-made-27000-last-year-via-tickets-cars-parked-one-ev-charging-spot/">City Of Raleigh Made $27,000 Last Year Via Tickets For Cars Parked In A Single EV Charging Spot</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/30/city-raleigh-made-27000-last-year-via-tickets-cars-parked-one-ev-charging-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking With $1 Billion Battery Startup Alevo</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/alevo-1-billion-battery-startup/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/alevo-1-billion-battery-startup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alevo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We recently covered the news of a battery startup called Alevo that has received $1 billion in private funding (yes, billion) and has just unstealthed after about a decade of development in germany, with an announcement that it was going straight to production and opening up a factory in North Carolina at the location of a </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/alevo-1-billion-battery-startup/">Talking With $1 Billion Battery Startup Alevo</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/10/alevo-1-billion-battery-startup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Listening Project Gets Across The EPA Clean Power Plan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/08/climate-listening-project-gets-across-epa-clean-power-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/08/climate-listening-project-gets-across-epa-clean-power-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 08:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adventure recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asheville Watershed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Ridge Parkway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Listening Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craft beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm-to-table]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Smoky Mountains National Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Climatic Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience to climate impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western North Carolina Alliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A thoughtful North Carolina nonprofit has devised a very effective and immediate way to display climate change on a local and personal level. The video below describes its program, The Climate Listening Project. The project is a new collaborative storytelling effort spearheaded by the Western North Carolina Alliance to connect conversations about local climate impacts and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/08/climate-listening-project-gets-across-epa-clean-power-plan/">Climate Listening Project Gets Across The EPA Clean Power Plan</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/08/climate-listening-project-gets-across-epa-clean-power-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LED Lighting Efficiency Jumps Roughly 50% Since 2012</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/05/led-lighting-efficiency-jumps-roughly-50-since-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/05/led-lighting-efficiency-jumps-roughly-50-since-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color rendering index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact fluorescent light bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incandescent light bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumens per watt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us eia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>LED light bulb efficiency has jumped roughly 50% since 2012 while prices dropped "dramatically," according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/05/led-lighting-efficiency-jumps-roughly-50-since-2012/">LED Lighting Efficiency Jumps Roughly 50% Since 2012</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/05/led-lighting-efficiency-jumps-roughly-50-since-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Heat Pumps</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/solar-decathlon-technology-spotlight-heat-pumps/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/solar-decathlon-technology-spotlight-heat-pumps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amber Archangel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net zero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Decathlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Decathlon 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology spotlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>1Sun4All. How much comfort is required to give up if we live in an energy-efficient house? How much would we lose by updating our home to net zero standards? Maybe none. Check out the latest article from Irene Ying for the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon, that tells us a lot about heat pump systems used to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/solar-decathlon-technology-spotlight-heat-pumps/">Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Heat Pumps</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/30/solar-decathlon-technology-spotlight-heat-pumps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.7 Billion+ Trips Taken On Public Transportation In 2nd Quarter</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Transit / Public Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trains / Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Public Transportation Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caltrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO Michael Melaniphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commuter rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas-Ft. Worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hampton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light-rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceanside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR and San Carlos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Mateo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>US public transportation ridership increased yet again in the second quarter of 2014. A press release report released by the American Public Transportation Association showed urban mobility increasing to over 2.7 billion trips on US public transportation in the second quarter. Urban travelers are making commonsense choices for their pockets and the environment, effecting a 1.1% increase in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/">2.7 Billion+ Trips Taken On Public Transportation In 2nd Quarter</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/24/2-7-billion-trips-taken-public-transportation-2nd-quarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina&#8217;s Renewable Energy Boom Being Driven By Solar, According To New Report</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/12/north-carolinas-renewable-energy-boom-driven-solar-according-new-report/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/12/north-carolinas-renewable-energy-boom-driven-solar-according-new-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 13:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ayre]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Charitable Trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>North Carolina&#8217;s recent renewable energy boom has been driven mostly by solar, according to a new report from The Pew Charitable Trusts.&#160;To be exact, the state saw its solar energy capacity grow by 335 MW in 2013 &#8212; making it the 3rd-fastest-growing state in the US with regard to renewable energy capacity. That number stands </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/12/north-carolinas-renewable-energy-boom-driven-solar-according-new-report/">North Carolina&#8217;s Renewable Energy Boom Being Driven By Solar, According To New Report</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/12/north-carolinas-renewable-energy-boom-driven-solar-according-new-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D Solar Panel Printing, Integrating Solar Into Grid Not So Hard&#8230; (Solar News)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/3d-solar-panel-printing/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/3d-solar-panel-printing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concentrating Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[André Borschberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burlington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RayGen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shunfeng Photovoltaic International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar impulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Impulse 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wuxi Suntech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Time for another solar energy news roundup. Enjoy! 3D printing of solar panels may soon be coming to a home near you. (Solar Love) Duke Energy is investing $500 million into solar power in North Carolina. (Solar Love) Goldman Sachs is offering solar PV financing for&#160;lower&#160;than banks in Japan. (Planetsave) We focus a lot on </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/3d-solar-panel-printing/">3D Solar Panel Printing, Integrating Solar Into Grid Not So Hard&#8230; (Solar News)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/3d-solar-panel-printing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Energy Commits $500 Million To Solar Power Expansion In North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/16/duke-energy-commits-500-million-solar-power-expansion-north-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/16/duke-energy-commits-500-million-solar-power-expansion-north-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$500 million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elm City Solar Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Solar Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warsaw Solar Facility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The largest US utility owner by market value, Duke Energy, announced Monday a commitment to invest $500 million into expanding the solar market in North Carolina. Duke Energy is set to acquire and construct three solar facilities to go hand-in-hand with five new power-purchase agreements (PPA). &#8220;This is Duke Energy&#8217;s largest single announcement for solar </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/16/duke-energy-commits-500-million-solar-power-expansion-north-carolina/">Duke Energy Commits $500 Million To Solar Power Expansion In North Carolina</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/16/duke-energy-commits-500-million-solar-power-expansion-north-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Energy Opportunities And Challenges In North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/15/opportunities-challenges-north-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/15/opportunities-challenges-north-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making it Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCSEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore wind in NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy in NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NCSEA’s “Making Energy Work,”  in Charlotte, NC, Oct 1&#38;2, 2014  Originally published in the ECOreport More than 600 local, regional and national attendees are expected at the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association’s 6th Annual Conference in Charlotte. “Making Energy Work” is a coming together of industry, utilities and customers, and they take that name very </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/15/opportunities-challenges-north-carolina/">Clean Energy Opportunities And Challenges In North Carolina</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/15/opportunities-challenges-north-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both Red &amp; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative utility revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer market incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Reicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed power systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE State Energy Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency resource standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings Performance Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient building code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal grant program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Schulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratories of democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Bill Repayment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onsite clean power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RETs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Clean Energy Cookbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steyer-Taylor Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Force on Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-variant pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bingaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Congress squelching innovation in Washington, we need to look to the states for policies green on energy. A study released by Stanford University and the Hoover Institution this week (The State Clean Energy Cookbook: A Dozen Recipes for State Action on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) cites 12 innovative projects being implemented by almost 20 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/">Both Red &#038; Blue States Green On Energy, Stanford Says</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/13/red-blue-states-green-energy-stanford-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Solar Energy States Per Capita (US)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment America Research and Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Weirding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnection policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting the Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-distance transmission line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most solar electricity installed per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas-fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak local demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per-capita solar electricity capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policymakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Electricity Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar carve-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar photovoltaics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar energy boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Environment America Research and Policy Center recently released Lighting the Way, a fascinating hard numbers&#8211;based take on the US solar energy boom, the top states that fostered it last year, and what the others are up to. The research organization finds that the top 10 solar energy states—Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/">Top 10 Solar Energy States Per Capita (US)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Large Scale Solar PV Projects At Risk, While California Powers On</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/large-scale-solar-pv-projects-risk-california-powers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/large-scale-solar-pv-projects-risk-california-powers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solarbuzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV project pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Deal Tracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar PV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The US solar PV pipeline has been standing on shaky ground for the past few months as trade investigations put a dampener on a number of projects relying on Chinese manufacturers. NPD Solarbuzz, working from their United States Deal Tracker, have pinpointed those sectors of the industry most likely to be affected by the trade disputes. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/large-scale-solar-pv-projects-risk-california-powers/">Large Scale Solar PV Projects At Risk, While California Powers On</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/large-scale-solar-pv-projects-risk-california-powers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Utilities About To Kill Solar Energy&#8217;s Future In North Carolina?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/23/are-utilities-about-to-kill-solar-energys-future-in-north-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/23/are-utilities-about-to-kill-solar-energys-future-in-north-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avoided costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fls energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC WARN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Purchase Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A North Carolina regulatory review could change solar energy's future in the state, with utilities pushing rules to grind new development to a halt</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/23/are-utilities-about-to-kill-solar-energys-future-in-north-carolina/">Are Utilities About To Kill Solar Energy&#8217;s Future In North Carolina?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/23/are-utilities-about-to-kill-solar-energys-future-in-north-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Apple Solar Farm Development In North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/12/3rd-apple-solar-farm-development-north-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/12/3rd-apple-solar-farm-development-north-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 23:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple solar farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple solar power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple, the electronics wizard, has permission to establish its third solar farm in North Carolina. Apple plans to spend $55 million, to create this 17.5 MW new solar farm. It estimates that the construction will be completed 5 years after purchase of the land. This development will be in the greater area of the city </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/12/3rd-apple-solar-farm-development-north-carolina/">3rd Apple Solar Farm Development In North Carolina</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/12/3rd-apple-solar-farm-development-north-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite Ohio Freeze, Renewable Energy Continues To Be Hot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/10/despite-ohio-freeze-renewable-energy-continues-hot/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/10/despite-ohio-freeze-renewable-energy-continues-hot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whirlpool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Brower Last month, Ohio Governor Kasich signed legislation putting a two-year ‘freeze’ on the state’s proven, successful, and money-saving renewable energy standard. Doing so, he is moving Ohio backward as other states move forward, developing job-creating  CO2-neutral/CO2-light, clean renewable energy. This new state law freezes economic growth in a sector that employs 25,000 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/10/despite-ohio-freeze-renewable-energy-continues-hot/">Despite Ohio Freeze, Renewable Energy Continues To Be Hot</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/10/despite-ohio-freeze-renewable-energy-continues-hot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80 MW Solar Power Plant Approved For North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/80-mw-solar-power-plant-approved-north-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/80-mw-solar-power-plant-approved-north-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 19:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake Richardson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple datacenter North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovative Solar Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Triangle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunEdison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of north carolina chapel hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The state of North Carolina has approved the connection of an 80 MW solar power plant to the Duke Energy grid</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/80-mw-solar-power-plant-approved-north-carolina/">80 MW Solar Power Plant Approved For North Carolina</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/04/80-mw-solar-power-plant-approved-north-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save Americans $37.4 Billion</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRDC]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advancement of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Lashof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICF International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Climate Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextGen Climate America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the website of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Many key states will benefit from climate action: AR, CO, FL, IA, IL, MI, MO, MN, NC, NV, OH, PA, and VA The first-ever limits on carbon pollution from power plants can save American households and business customers $37.4 billion on their electric bills in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/">Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save Americans $37.4 Billion</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.hastingsgroupmedia.com/052914NRDCcarbonjobsbillsanalysis.mp3" length="13980259" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Methodist Church In North Carolina Celebrating Energy From The Sun</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/25/methodist-church-north-carolina-celebrating-energy-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/25/methodist-church-north-carolina-celebrating-energy-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 09:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robyn Purchia]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Church of Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland United Methodist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Eden Keeper. On June 15 members of the Highland United Methodist Church in Raleigh, North Carolina will come together to celebrate. No, they’re not celebrating some obscure Christian holiday or Father’s Day (although their celebration will be honoring the Father in a way). They’re coming together to dedicate the church’s new solar array — </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/25/methodist-church-north-carolina-celebrating-energy-sun/">Methodist Church In North Carolina Celebrating Energy From The Sun</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/25/methodist-church-north-carolina-celebrating-energy-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina Republicans: &#8220;Reveal Fracking Chemicals, Go To Jail&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/north-carolina-gop-reveal-fracking-chemicals-go-jail/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/north-carolina-gop-reveal-fracking-chemicals-go-jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 04:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ayre]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking chemical disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina fracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No, not &#8220;reveal your fracking chemicals or go to jail,&#8221; but, &#8220;if you reveal anyone&#8217;s fracking chemicals, you should go to jail.&#8221; In a move that reeks of desperation (or perhaps it&#8217;s just a show for their owners?), three Republican state senators in North Carolina recently introduced a bill to the state legislature that would </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/north-carolina-gop-reveal-fracking-chemicals-go-jail/">North Carolina Republicans: &#8220;Reveal Fracking Chemicals, Go To Jail&#8221;</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/22/north-carolina-gop-reveal-fracking-chemicals-go-jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
