<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; MSEIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/mseia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a long post on the idea of using a &#8220;value of solar&#8221; policy instead of various types of government incentives for solar. Much of that post was based on research conducted by Clean Power Research for Austin Energy &#8212; so that Austin Energy could implement a Value of Solar policy (which it </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/">The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Considers Raising Renewable Energy Target after Solar Demand Surge</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/11/pennsylvania-considers-raising-renewable-energy-target-after-solar-demand-surge/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/11/pennsylvania-considers-raising-renewable-energy-target-after-solar-demand-surge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa alternative energy portfolio standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pa carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pa HB 1580]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pa solar cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa solar hot water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa solar thermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pa SRECs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA sunshine solar program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania AEPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pennsylvania House legislators are considering a bill that would speed up the rate at which utilities are required to add solar power capacity to their distribution systems in an effort to avoid a "boom, bust, boom cycle" following a surge in solar energy systems demand that has already seen installed solar PV capacity grow to more than 3x the state's 2020 target</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/11/pennsylvania-considers-raising-renewable-energy-target-after-solar-demand-surge/">Pennsylvania Considers Raising Renewable Energy Target after Solar Demand Surge</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/11/pennsylvania-considers-raising-renewable-energy-target-after-solar-demand-surge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
