<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Missouri</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/missouri/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Midwest Solar Market: Hot or Not?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/midwest-solar-market-hot/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/midwest-solar-market-hot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As much as 67 gigawatts of distributed solar power could be installed in the Midwest at prices competitive with utility retail rates by 2022, without subsidies. It&#8217;s enough solar to meet 5-10% or more of the region&#8217;s electricity demand. But the growth of solar energy in the Midwest has lagged other parts of the country. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/midwest-solar-market-hot/">Midwest Solar Market: Hot or Not?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/midwest-solar-market-hot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alumnus Builds Houses, Career on Solar Decathlon Experience</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/alumnus-builds-houses-career-solar-decathlon-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/alumnus-builds-houses-career-solar-decathlon-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amber Archangel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficient house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gable Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passive Energy Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Abendroth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Decathlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Decathlon 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra-efficient houses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>1Sun4All. Ryan Abendroth is the founder, principle, and practitioner of Passive Energy Designs in St. Louis, Missouri—a company that consults on high-performing, low-energy buildings. To date, he has consulted on more than 100 buildings to help others design and achieve ultra-efficient houses that are aesthetically pleasing and functionally livable. He credits this career to his participation in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/alumnus-builds-houses-career-solar-decathlon-experience/">Alumnus Builds Houses, Career on Solar Decathlon Experience</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/24/alumnus-builds-houses-career-solar-decathlon-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save Americans $37.4 Billion</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRDC]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advancement of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Lashof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICF International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Climate Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextGen Climate America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the website of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Many key states will benefit from climate action: AR, CO, FL, IA, IL, MI, MO, MN, NC, NV, OH, PA, and VA The first-ever limits on carbon pollution from power plants can save American households and business customers $37.4 billion on their electric bills in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/">Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save Americans $37.4 Billion</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/carbon-pollution-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.hastingsgroupmedia.com/052914NRDCcarbonjobsbillsanalysis.mp3" length="13980259" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show Me Solar: Missouri&#8217;s Opportunity for Solar Power</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/28/show-solar-missouris-opportunity-solar-power/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/28/show-solar-missouris-opportunity-solar-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 20:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What can solar power do for a single state? How about 21% of its energy, $14 billion in economic activity, and over 150,000 jobs. At a discount to existing electricity costs. Without subsidies. That&#8217;s what solar power can do for Missouri, but the state&#8217;s utilities may be about to pull the plug on local solar </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/28/show-solar-missouris-opportunity-solar-power/">Show Me Solar: Missouri&#8217;s Opportunity for Solar Power</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/28/show-solar-missouris-opportunity-solar-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Could Double Hydropower Production</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernest Moniz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of the River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Mead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Platte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Ridge National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Grande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Platte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Climate Central. By Bobby Magill The Grand Canyon was once targeted as a major dam site by the federal government, a project eventually scuttled after widespread protest. Nobody is revisiting the idea of a dam there, but a new U.S. Department of Energy report shows that the Grand Canyon and other major gorges and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/">US Could Double Hydropower Production</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Tesla Push In Missouri</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/12/anti-tesla-law/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/12/anti-tesla-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 22:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1124]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla sales model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Gas2. The scumbags that make up the car dealership lobby are at it again, this time sneaking language into an unrelated Missouri bill that would ban Tesla’s direct sales model. There has been no public debate about this bill, and it’s already been passed by the Missouri state Senate, leaving little time </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/12/anti-tesla-law/">Anti-Tesla Push In Missouri</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/12/anti-tesla-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA High-Speed Rail Gets Boost &#8212; 32-Train Order For Siemens Trains</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/27/usa-high-speed-rail-gets-boost-32-train-order-siemens-trains/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/27/usa-high-speed-rail-gets-boost-32-train-order-siemens-trains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-Speed Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trains / Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens high speed trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siemens trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published by the ECOreport. Siemens has obtained a $225 million contract to build 32 “Charger” diesel-electric locomotives in its Sacramento rail manufacturing facility for US high-speed rail projects. Five states are ordering locomotives. The Illinois Department of Transportation’s order is connected to an overhaul of its Chicago to St Louis route. California, Washington, Michigan, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/27/usa-high-speed-rail-gets-boost-32-train-order-siemens-trains/">USA High-Speed Rail Gets Boost &#8212; 32-Train Order For Siemens Trains</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/27/usa-high-speed-rail-gets-boost-32-train-order-siemens-trains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crazy Solar Story</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/14/crazy-solar-story/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/14/crazy-solar-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarkson Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarkson Valley Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar permitting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=61341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of our readers recently contacted me about a crazy fight her and her husband (+ other solar advocates in the state) were having with policymakers in her city. She contacted me right at the end of this story, before the finale you&#8217;ll read below. Following all of it, I asked her to write up </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/14/crazy-solar-story/">Crazy Solar Story</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/14/crazy-solar-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Solar States vs Top Solar Countries (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulgaria solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malta solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south africa solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spain solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thailand solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following our top solar states rankings and our top solar countries rankings, below are rankings that mix the two. The rankings are for total and new solar power capacity per capita as well as total and new solar power per GDP. I thin the results are very interesting&#8230;. If you missed these previous rankings, also </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/">Top Solar States vs Top Solar Countries (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Solar Power States Per Capita (Updated) vs Top Solar Policy Leaders (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last year, I put together rankings of the top solar power countries per capita, per GDP, and per TWh of electricity production. In January, I then created rankings of the top solar power states per capita and followed those up with rankings of the top solar power states per capita vs the top solar power </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/">Top Solar Power States Per Capita (Updated) vs Top Solar Policy Leaders (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Attack On Renewable Energy Standards, In Numbers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reposted from Greentech Media: By Herman Trabish At least twenty-two of the 29 state renewables standards have been attacked by legislators or regulators in the last year or are now under attack. Known as a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) or a Renewable Energy Standard (RES), these mandates require utilities to obtain a portion of their </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/">The Attack On Renewable Energy Standards, In Numbers</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Could Squash Economic Development From Renewable Energy In The State</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/missouri-could-squash-economic-development-from-renewable-energy-in-the-state/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/missouri-could-squash-economic-development-from-renewable-energy-in-the-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ameren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bart Korman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empire Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City Power & Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renew Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Missouri House passed a bill that, if it becomes a law, would greatly weaken a popular renewable energy law that was anticipated to create 22,000 jobs and associated economic development in the state. It&#8217;s the same sort of bill that was recently rejected by Kansas legislators. Here&#8217;s more from Renew Missouri: In 2008, Missourians </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/missouri-could-squash-economic-development-from-renewable-energy-in-the-state/">Missouri Could Squash Economic Development From Renewable Energy In The State</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/missouri-could-squash-economic-development-from-renewable-energy-in-the-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Conservatives Are Manipulating Renewable Energy Standards</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/how-conservatives-are-manipulating-renewable-energy-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/how-conservatives-are-manipulating-renewable-energy-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Freedom Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heartland institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington renewable energy standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article was originally published on Climate Progress. By Tiffany Germain and Matt Kasper As the Heartland Institute and the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, continue to target states’ renewable energy standard (RES) with their model legislation — the Electricity Freedom Act — conservative lawmakers are using other unethical tactics to weaken or repeal standards. Currently, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/how-conservatives-are-manipulating-renewable-energy-standards/">How Conservatives Are Manipulating Renewable Energy Standards</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/how-conservatives-are-manipulating-renewable-energy-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Environmental Groups Sue Utilities For Disobeying Renewable Energy Compliance Laws</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/01/missouri-environmental-groups-sue-utilities-for-disobeying-renewable-energy-compliance-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/01/missouri-environmental-groups-sue-utilities-for-disobeying-renewable-energy-compliance-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chelsea]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ameren Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empire District Electric Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroelectricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydropower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Department of Natural Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Missouri environmental watchdogs are taking Missouri utilities companies to task over failure to increase power coming from renewables, as was approved by voters on a 2008 ballot initiative. Renew Missouri and Great Rivers Environmental Law Center (on behalf of seven other groups) are suing Ameren Missouri and Empire District Electric Company for about $100 million </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/01/missouri-environmental-groups-sue-utilities-for-disobeying-renewable-energy-compliance-laws/">Missouri Environmental Groups Sue Utilities For Disobeying Renewable Energy Compliance Laws</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/01/missouri-environmental-groups-sue-utilities-for-disobeying-renewable-energy-compliance-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Nanotech Battery Energy Storage System Debuts in Kansas City</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/18/new-nanotech-battery-energy-storage-system-debuts-in-kansas-city/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/18/new-nanotech-battery-energy-storage-system-debuts-in-kansas-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging Stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exergonix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCP&L]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microgrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> A new 1MW nanotech battery energy storage system will tie together solar power and the smart grid to boost Kansas City's regional green economy. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/18/new-nanotech-battery-energy-storage-system-debuts-in-kansas-city/">New Nanotech Battery Energy Storage System Debuts in Kansas City</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/18/new-nanotech-battery-energy-storage-system-debuts-in-kansas-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Renewable Energy Standards in State Legislatures &#8212; How They Lookin&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/04/state-renewable-energy-standards-in-state-legislatures-how-they-lookin/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/04/state-renewable-energy-standards-in-state-legislatures-how-they-lookin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 09:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state renewable energy standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; This is a repost from Midwest Energy News on how renewable energy standards are fairing in state legislatures &#8212; enjoy! By Dan Haugen To repeal, reform, or ramp up? State legislatures across the region have been considering a full spectrum of proposals related to renewable portfolio standards. With sessions winding down for the year, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/04/state-renewable-energy-standards-in-state-legislatures-how-they-lookin/">State Renewable Energy Standards in State Legislatures &#8212; How They Lookin&#8217;?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/04/state-renewable-energy-standards-in-state-legislatures-how-they-lookin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Self-Reliance Worth 20 Times the Economic Benefit for Missouri</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/06/energy-self-reliance-worth-20-times-the-economic-benefit-for-missouri/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/06/energy-self-reliance-worth-20-times-the-economic-benefit-for-missouri/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a stunning reversal of popular wisdom, overzealous state legislators and interest groups are jeopardizing over $4 billion in economic activity and thousands of jobs promised in Missouri’s 3-year old renewable energy law.  Missourians should override their mistaken legislators, reaffirming their commitment to local renewable energy and even consider the benefits of maximizing the state’s clean electricity production</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/06/energy-self-reliance-worth-20-times-the-economic-benefit-for-missouri/">Energy Self-Reliance Worth 20 Times the Economic Benefit for Missouri</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/06/energy-self-reliance-worth-20-times-the-economic-benefit-for-missouri/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New 146 Megawatt Wind Farm in Missouri Reveals the Future Beyond Fossil Fuels</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/20/new-146-megawatt-wind-farm-in-missouri-reveals-the-future-beyond-fossil-fuels/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/20/new-146-megawatt-wind-farm-in-missouri-reveals-the-future-beyond-fossil-fuels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Casey]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atchison County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iberdrola renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=11614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Atchison County, Missouri has just dedicated the new Farmers City Wind Power Project, consisting of 73 turbines that produce 146 megawatts of clean power, enough for 33,000 homes.  In stark contrast to the destruction caused by fossil fuel harvesting, the massive renewable energy project will coexist with farmland, which will continue to yield corn and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/20/new-146-megawatt-wind-farm-in-missouri-reveals-the-future-beyond-fossil-fuels/">New 146 Megawatt Wind Farm in Missouri Reveals the Future Beyond Fossil Fuels</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/20/new-146-megawatt-wind-farm-in-missouri-reveals-the-future-beyond-fossil-fuels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transit Use Boom, but in Some Surprising Cities</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/transit-use-boom-but-in-some-surprising-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/transit-use-boom-but-in-some-surprising-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Transit / Public Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arden Arcade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto-oriented]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellevue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloominton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gastonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pheonix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roseville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san antonio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Bernardino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottsdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tacoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit-oriented]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Transit use boomed from 2006-2008, but not in traditionally transit-friendly areas. This shows hope for more transit use in traditionally car-oriented places in the US in the future. An analysis of the most recent transit use data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that transit use grew by up to 47% in major metropolitan areas </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/transit-use-boom-but-in-some-surprising-cities/">Transit Use Boom, but in Some Surprising Cities</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/transit-use-boom-but-in-some-surprising-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington University in St. Louis May Sport Greenest Building in North America</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Kart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campus sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living building challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>LEED, for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, has become the alpha acronym when referring to green, or eco-friendly, buildings. The standard, from the U.S. Green Building Council, recently went 3.0. Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, is taking the green diploma to an even higher degree. University officials are betting a new Living Learning </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/">Washington University in St. Louis May Sport Greenest Building in North America</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
