<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; EIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/eia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Solar PV Generation Doubles (Monthly US Electricity Generation Report)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/05/solar-pv-generation-doubles-monthly-us-electricity-generation-report/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/05/solar-pv-generation-doubles-monthly-us-electricity-generation-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 21:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Electricity Generation Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following up on my first monthly report on US electricity generation by source, here&#8217;s the next one. Electricity generation data takes longer to gather than capacity data, so the EIA&#8217;s electricity generation information is always from a couple of months prior. In this case, we now have data from September. Check out the charts and a bit of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/05/solar-pv-generation-doubles-monthly-us-electricity-generation-report/">Solar PV Generation Doubles (Monthly US Electricity Generation Report)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/05/solar-pv-generation-doubles-monthly-us-electricity-generation-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Energy = 10% of US Electricity Generation In August</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/02/us-electricity-generation-update/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/02/us-electricity-generation-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 12:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE November 3: This article (including the top 3 charts and top table) has been updated to correct numbers used for fossil fuel and nuclear sources. I previously used &#8220;Table 1.1. Net Generation by Energy Source: Total (All Sectors), 2004-August 2014 (Thousand Megawatthours)&#8221; of the EIA&#8217;s Electric Power Monthly report for those sources, when I </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/02/us-electricity-generation-update/">Renewable Energy = 10% of US Electricity Generation In August</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/02/us-electricity-generation-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Grid Defection Makes Economic Sense (Graphs &amp; Charts)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/20/grid-defection-makes-economic-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/20/grid-defection-makes-economic-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigant Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic battery prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off grid solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocky mountain institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After having it on my desktop for ages, I recently took a look at a Rocky Mountain Institute and Cohn Reznick report on The Economics of Grid Defection &#8212; in other words, when does it make sense to go off the grid in various parts of the US for those in the residential or commercial sectors? It&#8217;s </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/20/grid-defection-makes-economic-sense/">When Grid Defection Makes Economic Sense (Graphs &#038; Charts)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/20/grid-defection-makes-economic-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is PJM Costing Consumers $1.3 Billion By Ignoring Energy Efficiency?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/is-pjm-costing-consumers-1-3-billion-by-ignoring-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/is-pjm-costing-consumers-1-3-billion-by-ignoring-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allison Clements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brattle Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal-ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM Interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM Interconnection energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New analysis says America's largest grid operator ignores gigawatts of energy efficiency savings, overestimates power demand, and costs consumers billions</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/is-pjm-costing-consumers-1-3-billion-by-ignoring-energy-efficiency/">Is PJM Costing Consumers $1.3 Billion By Ignoring Energy Efficiency?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/19/is-pjm-costing-consumers-1-3-billion-by-ignoring-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Growth Beat Out Natural Gas In First Half Of 2014</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/11/solar-growth-beat-natural-gas-first-half-2014/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/11/solar-growth-beat-natural-gas-first-half-2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTM Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Power plant capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US PV pipeline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New figures from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) released earlier this week concluded that natural gas leads solar in terms of new power plant capacity &#8212; a fact that is indisputable, but a fact that doesn&#8217;t tell the whole story. According to Greentech Media, which spend a lot of time closely tracking the various energy </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/11/solar-growth-beat-natural-gas-first-half-2014/">Solar Growth Beat Out Natural Gas In First Half Of 2014</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/11/solar-growth-beat-natural-gas-first-half-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Other Renewables Are Surpassing Hydro</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/20/renewables-surpassing-hydro/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/20/renewables-surpassing-hydro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinventing fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US renewable Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rocky Mountain Institute. By Laurie Guevara-​Stone. 2014 is predicted to be the first year in history that non-hydro renewable generation exceeds hydropower generation in the United States. This is a big change—only a decade ago hydropower produced three times as much electricity in the U.S. as the combined contributions of non-hydro sources such as wind, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/20/renewables-surpassing-hydro/">Why Other Renewables Are Surpassing Hydro</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/20/renewables-surpassing-hydro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 EIA Stats Show Oil Price Stability Based On News, Not Supply</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/07/2013-eia-stats-show-oil-price-stability-based-news-supply/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/07/2013-eia-stats-show-oil-price-stability-based-news-supply/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barrels per day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil price increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruptions in supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energytrendsinsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global oil consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globally traded commodity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jet fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Prices and Uncertainty Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroleum. petroleum product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rising demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Rapier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saudi arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short-Term Energy Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spare capacity in the system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply and demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s start this analysis with the 2013 figures for the United States (right). In general, the oil export/import status looks better for the US than it has in a long time. Although the US is a major oil producer, it has been an even heavier oil consumer, importing millions of barrels per day of oil </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/07/2013-eia-stats-show-oil-price-stability-based-news-supply/">2013 EIA Stats Show Oil Price Stability Based On News, Not Supply</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/07/2013-eia-stats-show-oil-price-stability-based-news-supply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Native American Reservations Embracing Renewable Energy Technologies</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/native-american-reservations-embracing-renewable-energy-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/native-american-reservations-embracing-renewable-energy-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hopi Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hopi Solar Electric Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moapa Band of Paiutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moapa Travel Plaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native American reservations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NativeSUN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navajo Tribal Utility Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oglala Lakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pine Ridge Reservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuntutuliak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Alaska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>RMI Outlet By Laurie Guevara-Stone  If I told you about a place where almost 40 percent of the people live without electricity, over 90 percent live below the poverty line, and the unemployment rate exceeds 80 percent, you might be picturing a rural village in Africa or some other developing country. However, this community is </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/native-american-reservations-embracing-renewable-energy-technologies/">Native American Reservations Embracing Renewable Energy Technologies</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/native-american-reservations-embracing-renewable-energy-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 New Energy Maps Show A Lot About Renewables</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachian ridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covanta Essex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Mapping System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Mapping System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Climate Central  By Bobby Magill When the U.S. Energy Information Administration launched its new U.S. Energy Mapping System last fall and upgraded it for use on mobile devices in early June, it powered a system allowing anyone to visualize some of the reams of data the EIA compiles on all things energy-related in the country. That mapping system has a </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/">4 New Energy Maps Show A Lot About Renewables</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/30/new-energy-mapping-system-shows-lot-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Climate Action &#8220;Costs&#8221; Illuminated</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/08/us-climate-action-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/08/us-climate-action-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2014 09:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Air Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katrina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinventing fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third National Climate Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Rocky Mountain Institute. By Jules Kortenhorst Earlier this week, the United States Environmental Protection Agency announced new guidelines under the Clean Air Act limiting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants. The move comes in the wake of the federal government’s Third National Climate Assessment, exposing the serious risk climate change poses to the nation’s </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/08/us-climate-action-costs/">US Climate Action &#8220;Costs&#8221; Illuminated</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/08/us-climate-action-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time To Drop LCOE?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/lcoe-drop/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/lcoe-drop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 08:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Institute]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Energy Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Rocky Mountain Institute. By Peter Bronski Leaving behind the limitations of levelized cost of energy for a better energy metric Once upon a time I was infatuated with levelized cost of energy (LCOE). It has had staying power, in prevalent use for decades as a metric of choice to evaluate and compare </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/lcoe-drop/">Time To Drop LCOE?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/02/lcoe-drop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German Electricity Suppliers Not Passing On Wholesale Electricity Cuts</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/27/german-electricity-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/27/german-electricity-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brussels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e.on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnBW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigmar Gabriel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umlage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vattenfall Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EnergyPost. By Gabriel Camus Complaints about the high costs of the Energiewende are misguided. The primary reason German users pay high electricity prices is not the government’s support scheme for renewable energy. It is rather the fact that energy suppliers are not passing on to consumers the large drop in wholesale prices </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/27/german-electricity-prices/">German Electricity Suppliers Not Passing On Wholesale Electricity Cuts</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/27/german-electricity-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Rooftop Solar Is The Best Choice For The UK Economy Right Now &#8212; Even With The British Weather​!​</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/rooftop-solar-best-choice-uk-economy-right-now-even-british-weather%e2%80%8b%e2%80%8b/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/rooftop-solar-best-choice-uk-economy-right-now-even-british-weather%e2%80%8b%e2%80%8b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Energy Information Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michal Bacia In April of this year,​ ​t​he British Government​,​ through its Department of Energy &#38; Climate Change​,​ announced “​&#8230;plans to turn the Government estate as well as factories, supermarkets and car parks into solar hubs​.​” This is huge! ​Translation? Government support for solar PV distributed generation (DG). ​Yay!​ The UK solar industry (at </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/rooftop-solar-best-choice-uk-economy-right-now-even-british-weather%e2%80%8b%e2%80%8b/">Why Rooftop Solar Is The Best Choice For The UK Economy Right Now &#8212; Even With The British Weather​!​</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/18/rooftop-solar-best-choice-uk-economy-right-now-even-british-weather%e2%80%8b%e2%80%8b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CO2 Emissions From Electric Power Sector Vary With Coal &amp; Nuclear Retirements</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/co2-emissions-electric-power-sector-vary-coal-nuclear-retirements/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/co2-emissions-electric-power-sector-vary-coal-nuclear-retirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 17:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accelerated Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accelerated Coal Retirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEO2014 Accelerated Nuclear Retirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Retirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable portfolio standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EIA. Significant retirements of nuclear and coal power plants in the United States could change the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted by the electric power sector. EIA&#8217;s Annual Energy Outlook 2014 (AEO2014) features several accelerated retirements cases that represent conditions leading to additional coal and nuclear plant retirements in order to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/co2-emissions-electric-power-sector-vary-coal-nuclear-retirements/">CO2 Emissions From Electric Power Sector Vary With Coal &#038; Nuclear Retirements</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/co2-emissions-electric-power-sector-vary-coal-nuclear-retirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Electricity Generation Projections Related To Cost, Price, Policy, &amp; Economic Conditions</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/renewable-electricity-generation-projections-related-cost-price-policy-economic-conditions/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/renewable-electricity-generation-projections-related-cost-price-policy-economic-conditions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 16:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEO2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Energy Outlook 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us electricity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EIA. Renewable electricity generation in the United States is projected to grow by 69% from 2012 to 2040 in the Annual Energy Outlook 2014 (AEO2014) Reference case, including an increase of more than 140% in generation from nonhydropower renewable energy sources. While projected hydropower generation is almost completely insensitive to alternative assumptions </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/renewable-electricity-generation-projections-related-cost-price-policy-economic-conditions/">Renewable Electricity Generation Projections Related To Cost, Price, Policy, &#038; Economic Conditions</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/06/renewable-electricity-generation-projections-related-cost-price-policy-economic-conditions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar &amp; Global Politics, &amp; Why Ukraine &amp; Qatar Are Critical Hubs There</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/solar-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/solar-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 10:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AriSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make My Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatari Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarWorld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on SolarWakeup. By Yann Brandt Solar may be a small portion of energy production globally but the importance in geo-politics continues to grow. All energy usage may be local, when a homeowner plugs in their cell phone charge into the wall but when it comes to energy production, it is anything but local. Looking </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/solar-2/">Solar &#038; Global Politics, &#038; Why Ukraine &#038; Qatar Are Critical Hubs There</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/solar-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas In New York Marcellus Shale Costs More To Get It Out Than The Gas Is Worth</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeSmog Blog]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben van Beurden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chesapeake energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft 2014 energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elisabeth Radow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fadel Gheit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[League of Women Voters of New York State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyndon Pittinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oppenheimer & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Tillerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volumetric Production Payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on DeSmogBlog. By Sharon Kelly For years, the shale industry has touted the economic benefits it can provide. An overflowing supply of domestic natural gas will help keep heating and electric bills low for American consumers, they argue, while drilling jobs and astounding royalty windfalls for landowners will reinvigorate local economies. These tantalizing promises have </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/">Natural Gas In New York Marcellus Shale Costs More To Get It Out Than The Gas Is Worth</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/25/natural-gas-new-york-marcellus-shale-costs-get-gas-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11 States Produced Twice As Much Power From Nonhydro Renewables Than US Average</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/11-states-produced-power-nonhydro-renewables-twice-us-average/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/11-states-produced-power-nonhydro-renewables-twice-us-average/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Power Monthly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us electricity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EIA. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly About 6.2% of total U.S. electricity supplies in 2013 were generated from nonhydro renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal, up from 5.4% in 2012. But 11 states produced electricity at more than twice the national average from these sources—accounting for </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/11-states-produced-power-nonhydro-renewables-twice-us-average/">11 States Produced Twice As Much Power From Nonhydro Renewables Than US Average</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/22/11-states-produced-power-nonhydro-renewables-twice-us-average/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80% Of US Wind Power In 2013 Generated By 12 States</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/80-us-wind-power-2013-generated-12-states/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/80-us-wind-power-2013-generated-12-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Power Monthly Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March Electric Power Monthly report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Today in Energy. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly In 2013, 12 states accounted for 80% of U.S. wind-generated electricity, according to preliminary generation data released in EIA&#8217;s March Electric Power Monthly report. Texas was again the top wind power state with nearly 36 million megawatthours (MWh) of electricity. Iowa was second, with </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/80-us-wind-power-2013-generated-12-states/">80% Of US Wind Power In 2013 Generated By 12 States</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/80-us-wind-power-2013-generated-12-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just How Off Is EIA&#8217;s Renewable Energy Outlook? How About 20+ Years?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/16/just-eias-renewable-energy-outlook-20-years/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/16/just-eias-renewable-energy-outlook-20-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Energy Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Energy Outlook 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUN DAY Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind PTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The US Energy Information Administration's renewable energy forecast could be underestimating growth by as much as 22 years, according to a new analysis</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/16/just-eias-renewable-energy-outlook-20-years/">Just How Off Is EIA&#8217;s Renewable Energy Outlook? How About 20+ Years?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/16/just-eias-renewable-energy-outlook-20-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
