<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Delaware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/delaware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Top 10 Solar Energy States Per Capita (US)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment America Research and Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Weirding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnection policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting the Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-distance transmission line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most solar electricity installed per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas-fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak local demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per-capita solar electricity capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policymakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Electricity Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar carve-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar photovoltaics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar energy boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Environment America Research and Policy Center recently released Lighting the Way, a fascinating hard numbers&#8211;based take on the US solar energy boom, the top states that fostered it last year, and what the others are up to. The research organization finds that the top 10 solar energy states—Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/">Top 10 Solar Energy States Per Capita (US)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/03/top-10-solar-energy-states-per-capita-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fisker Karma To Relaunch (Just 250 “Bugs” To Fix First)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/31/fisker-karma-relaunch-bugs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/31/fisker-karma-relaunch-bugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisker atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisker karma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanxaing Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wanxiang Group now owns the rights to the Fisker Karma, which it plans to relaunch after fixing some 250 “bugs” found in the original design</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/31/fisker-karma-relaunch-bugs/">Fisker Karma To Relaunch (Just 250 “Bugs” To Fix First)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/31/fisker-karma-relaunch-bugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey Haters, RGGI Cap And Trade Powered 800 MW New Renewables in 2013</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 17:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Council On Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decarbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Brower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Green Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York State solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM Interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale gas boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Northeast U.S. cap-and-trade system helped install 800MW new renewables capacity in 2013, showing states how EPA's proposed emissions rule can succeed</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/">Hey Haters, RGGI Cap And Trade Powered 800 MW New Renewables in 2013</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billionaire Lu Guanqiu Determined To Make Fisker A Competitor With Tesla&#8230; Or Go Broke Trying</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/fisker/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/fisker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 01:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A123 Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisker automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisker karma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lu Guanqiu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanxiang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanxiang Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Gas2. Can Fisker’s new Chinese owners build a rival to Tesla Motors? Wanxiang Group’s billionaire owner Lu Guanqiu wants to do just that, or go broke trying. That’s a bold statement, but the pieces are all in place to make it happen. It’s China vs. America in the battle of the electric </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/fisker/">Billionaire Lu Guanqiu Determined To Make Fisker A Competitor With Tesla&#8230; Or Go Broke Trying</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/fisker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Could Double Hydropower Production</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernest Moniz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of the River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Mead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Platte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Ridge National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Grande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Platte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Climate Central. By Bobby Magill The Grand Canyon was once targeted as a major dam site by the federal government, a project eventually scuttled after widespread protest. Nobody is revisiting the idea of a dam there, but a new U.S. Department of Energy report shows that the Grand Canyon and other major gorges and </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/">US Could Double Hydropower Production</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/14/us-double-hydropower-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Energy Policy Takes Important Step Forward US Senate</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AWEA]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(EXPIRE) Act of 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA’s Power of Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Cardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debbie Stabenow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXPIRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expiring Provisions Improvement Reform and Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Isakson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Crapo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Menendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherrod Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Carper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Viriginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=65539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Into the Wind. By Mary Kate Francis  Across the country, wind power supporters are thanking their legislators for taking an important step forward in the effort to extend the renewable energy Production Tax Credit (PTC). The Senate Finance Committee, whose members are listed below, approved a bill on Thursday, April 3, to extend </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/">Wind Energy Policy Takes Important Step Forward US Senate</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/18/wind-energy-policy-changes-us-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit Gets Important Last-Minute Push</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AWEA]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Cardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debbie Stabenow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Crapo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Carper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Kiernan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind itc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind PTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on the AWEA website (image added). Washington, D.C., — The renewable energy Production Tax Credit (PTC) and Investment Tax Credit (ITC) were included today with bipartisan support, as the U.S. Senate Finance Committee reported out a tax extenders package whose swift passage is critically important to the continued growth of the U.S. wind </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/">Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit Gets Important Last-Minute Push</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/04/03/renewable-energy-production-tax-credit-gets-important-last-minute-push/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware Fisker Factory Sold To Wanxiang For $18 Million</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/28/delaware-fisker-factory-sold-wanxiang-18-million/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/28/delaware-fisker-factory-sold-wanxiang-18-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 21:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher DeMorro]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A123 Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Lutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisker Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisker karma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henrik Fisker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VL Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanxiang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=64553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Gas2. With the purchase of the former GM assembly plant in Delaware, Wanxiang may finally make good on Fisker’s promise to produce cars right here in America. It’s been a bumpy road for Fisker, but things are finally looking up as it seems the automaker has fallen into the hands of the </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/28/delaware-fisker-factory-sold-wanxiang-18-million/">Delaware Fisker Factory Sold To Wanxiang For $18 Million</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/28/delaware-fisker-factory-sold-wanxiang-18-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NREL Correlates Solar Policy Successes &amp; Failures</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/15/nrel-correlates-successes-failures-solar-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/15/nrel-correlates-successes-failures-solar-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Meyers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darlene Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Sequencing for State Distributed PV Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Effectiveness of State-Level Policies on Solar Market Development in Different State Contexts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=63875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Green Building Elements. The following report from NREL concerning issues in state solar energy policies should prove timely and useful to those involved with commercial and residential renewable energy products. The Energy Department’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has published a report that aligns solar policy and market success with state demographics. By organizing the 48 </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/15/nrel-correlates-successes-failures-solar-policy/">NREL Correlates Solar Policy Successes &#038; Failures</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/15/nrel-correlates-successes-failures-solar-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Attractive States For Investing In Solar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/24/attractive-states-investing-solar/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/24/attractive-states-investing-solar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTM Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e&y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernst & Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernst & Young solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernst & Young solar states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=59318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Cost of Solar. –&#62;&#160;See how much money solar power could save you! There are a lot of ways to evaluate the attractiveness of a place for renewable energy or solar energy investment, and to evaluate the best solar states. Of course, it depends on what factors and assumptions you take into account, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/24/attractive-states-investing-solar/">Most Attractive States For Investing In Solar</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/24/attractive-states-investing-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top US States For Solar Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/08/top-us-states-for-solar-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/08/top-us-states-for-solar-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NerdWallet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5 Solar States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NerdWallet have compiled the top 5 states in the US for residential solar energy, according to four specific criteria. Top of the pile was California, thanks to a sunny location, the pioneering of solar leasing, and great cash-back incentives. Filling out the top 5 were Hawaii, Arizona, Maryland, and Delaware. NerdWallet explained that they wanted </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/08/top-us-states-for-solar-energy/">Top US States For Solar Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/08/top-us-states-for-solar-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dazzling Dozen US States Illuminate Path To Solar Energy Future</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/dazzling-dozen-us-states-illuminate-path-to-solar-energy-future/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/dazzling-dozen-us-states-illuminate-path-to-solar-energy-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feed-in tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NREL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-bill financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Purchase Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Assessed Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Sargent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart grid modernization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar carve-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy installers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar rights laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual net metering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A solar energy revolution is dawning in America, led by the "Dazzling Dozen" - twelve states whose progressive policies dominate the solar industry with 85% of all US solar capacity but just 28% of the total population. </p>
<p>Environment America’s “Lighting the Way” report outlines their successful policies and illuminate the path forward to a nationwide clean energy economy</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/dazzling-dozen-us-states-illuminate-path-to-solar-energy-future/">Dazzling Dozen US States Illuminate Path To Solar Energy Future</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/dazzling-dozen-us-states-illuminate-path-to-solar-energy-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Solar States vs Top Solar Countries (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulgaria solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greece solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malta solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south africa solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spain solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thailand solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following our top solar states rankings and our top solar countries rankings, below are rankings that mix the two. The rankings are for total and new solar power capacity per capita as well as total and new solar power per GDP. I thin the results are very interesting&#8230;. If you missed these previous rankings, also </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/">Top Solar States vs Top Solar Countries (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/top-solar-states-vs-top-solar-countries-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Solar Power States Per Capita (Updated) vs Top Solar Policy Leaders (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top solar power states per capita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last year, I put together rankings of the top solar power countries per capita, per GDP, and per TWh of electricity production. In January, I then created rankings of the top solar power states per capita and followed those up with rankings of the top solar power states per capita vs the top solar power </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/">Top Solar Power States Per Capita (Updated) vs Top Solar Policy Leaders (CleanTechnica Exclusive)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/25/solar-power-by-state-solar-rankings-by-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Wind Power, Save Nearly $7 Billion Per Year In Mid-Atlantic US</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/13/double-wind-power-save-nearly-7-billion-per-year-in-mid-atlantic-us/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/13/double-wind-power-save-nearly-7-billion-per-year-in-mid-atlantic-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for a Clean Energy Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Future Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Atlantic Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Benefit of Increased Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Benefit of Increased Wind Power in PJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextEra Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM wind energy study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM wind study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synapse Energy Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIRES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The below article is courtesy of Americans for a Clean Energy Grid. WASHINGTON, DC – Adding more wind power to the grid in the PJM region can lower gas and coal consumption and reduce regional wholesale energy market prices, saving nearly $7 billion per year in the mid-2020s, according to a new study conducted by Synapse </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/13/double-wind-power-save-nearly-7-billion-per-year-in-mid-atlantic-us/">Double Wind Power, Save Nearly $7 Billion Per Year In Mid-Atlantic US</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/13/double-wind-power-save-nearly-7-billion-per-year-in-mid-atlantic-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Attack On Renewable Energy Standards, In Numbers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington renewable energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Renewable Energy Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reposted from Greentech Media: By Herman Trabish At least twenty-two of the 29 state renewables standards have been attacked by legislators or regulators in the last year or are now under attack. Known as a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) or a Renewable Energy Standard (RES), these mandates require utilities to obtain a portion of their </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/">The Attack On Renewable Energy Standards, In Numbers</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/29/the-attack-on-renewable-energy-standards-in-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RGGI Nets $106 Million For Clean Energy, May Hit $2 Billion By 2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/19/rggi-nets-106-million-in-revenue-may-hit-2-billion-by-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/19/rggi-nets-106-million-in-revenue-may-hit-2-billion-by-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon allowance auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICF International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) held its 19th auction of CO2 allowances late last week and sold nearly 38 million allowances at a clearing price of $2.80, generating $105.9 million in revenue. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/19/rggi-nets-106-million-in-revenue-may-hit-2-billion-by-2020/">RGGI Nets $106 Million For Clean Energy, May Hit $2 Billion By 2020</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/19/rggi-nets-106-million-in-revenue-may-hit-2-billion-by-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States Lead in Freeing the Grid for Small-Scale Renewable Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/18/states-lead-in-freeing-the-grid-for-small-scale-renewable-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/18/states-lead-in-freeing-the-grid-for-small-scale-renewable-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freeing the Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small-scale solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new report ranks states on net metering and interconnection policies designed to boost small-scale renewables. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/18/states-lead-in-freeing-the-grid-for-small-scale-renewable-energy/">States Lead in Freeing the Grid for Small-Scale Renewable Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/18/states-lead-in-freeing-the-grid-for-small-scale-renewable-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Power Plant Emissions in RGGI Region Fall to Lowest Level Yet</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/18/report-power-plant-emissions-in-rggi-region-fall-to-lowest-level-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/18/report-power-plant-emissions-in-rggi-region-fall-to-lowest-level-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Emissions from power plants in states served by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative have fallen to their lowest levels since the CO2 auction program launched in 2009, according to a new report from Environment Northeast</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/18/report-power-plant-emissions-in-rggi-region-fall-to-lowest-level-yet/">Report: Power Plant Emissions in RGGI Region Fall to Lowest Level Yet</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/18/report-power-plant-emissions-in-rggi-region-fall-to-lowest-level-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 States Stay in Northeast Cap &amp; Trade Program (for Obvious Reasons) Despite Huge Republican/Tea Party Attack</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/24/states-northeast-cap-trade-republican-tea-party-attack-nj-new-jersey/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/24/states-northeast-cap-trade-republican-tea-party-attack-nj-new-jersey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 20:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap & trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delaware rggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maine rggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire rggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey rggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nh rggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nj rggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I had been worried about two or three states pulling out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI, pronounced “Reggie”), the nation's first cap and trade program for greenhouse gases, for awhile. It seemed 99.9% sure that New Hampshire would pull out after its House of Representatives voted to pull out of the initiative and its Senate had a clear Republican majority likely to do the same. Even if the Governor tried to veto such a decision, he could be overridden</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/24/states-northeast-cap-trade-republican-tea-party-attack-nj-new-jersey/">3 States Stay in Northeast Cap &#038; Trade Program (for Obvious Reasons) Despite Huge Republican/Tea Party Attack</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/24/states-northeast-cap-trade-republican-tea-party-attack-nj-new-jersey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
