<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; community choice aggregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/community-choice-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Same Price, More Renewables – San Diego’s Fight for Community Controlled Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“San Diego and its community choice energy district would be able to offer a diverse energy mix with all of the solar, biodiesel, biogas, and energy storage resources that we have in San Diego.  A product that is price competitive and yet at the same time would strive for and achieve a higher level of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/">Same Price, More Renewables – San Diego’s Fight for Community Controlled Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/local-energy-rules-lane-sharman-ep23-2014-0605.mp3" length="13764985" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local, 33% Renewable, Lower Prices. Sonoma Clean (Community) Power Has Launched</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Starting this May, 20,000 Sonoma County, CA, electricity customers are getting renewable power at a lower cost than from their previous electric utility, Pacific Gas &#38; Electric. The portion of renewable electricity (“CleanStart”) for the average customer will rise by 50%. For those so motivated – 3% of customers already – it’s also possible to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/">Local, 33% Renewable, Lower Prices. Sonoma Clean (Community) Power Has Launched</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; AB 2145, Is Dead</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California For Energy Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lane Sharman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Hastings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the ECOreport California’s monopoly utilities failed in what many perceive as their latest attempt to squash community choice aggregates. Assemblyman Steven Bradford could not find a senator willing to sponsor his controversial bill, so it expired when the legislature’s current session ended, at 3 am on Saturday morning. California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; AB </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/">California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; AB 2145, Is Dead</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of Collective Energy Purchasing</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/18/power-collective-energy-purchasing/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/18/power-collective-energy-purchasing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulk energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenwashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RECs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy certificates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We can&#8217;t do it as an individual, But four hundred communities aggregating and asking for local wind power and solar power &#8211; that&#8217;s really powerful.&#8221; Oak Park, IL, is one of hundreds of Illinois towns using their authority to buy electricity in bulk on behalf of its residential and small business customers. So far, most </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/18/power-collective-energy-purchasing/">The Power of Collective Energy Purchasing</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/18/power-collective-energy-purchasing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greening Or Greenwashing? Illinois Cities’ Use of RECs Shows Challenges With Local Energy Choice</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/04/greening-greenwashing-illinois-cities-use-recs-shows-challenges-local-energy-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/04/greening-greenwashing-illinois-cities-use-recs-shows-challenges-local-energy-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent report from the World Wildlife Fund (and others) touts how city energy aggregation is “unleashing” renewable energy in Illinois. Buying electricity on behalf of their residential and small business customers, nearly 100 Midwestern cities have purchased renewable energy credits (RECs) along with their energy supply, giving their electrons a questionable aura of green </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/04/greening-greenwashing-illinois-cities-use-recs-shows-challenges-local-energy-choice/">Greening Or Greenwashing? Illinois Cities’ Use of RECs Shows Challenges With Local Energy Choice</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/04/greening-greenwashing-illinois-cities-use-recs-shows-challenges-local-energy-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choosing Local (Renewable) Power: One California Community A Leader In Collective Action</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/choosing-local-renewable-power-one-california-community-leader-collective-action/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/choosing-local-renewable-power-one-california-community-leader-collective-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Community choice aggregation describes a situation where a town can become the bulk buyer of electricity on behalf of its residential and small business customers. Such local aggregations serve about 5% of utility customers in Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and California, but it’s Marin Clean Energy in California that stands above the crowd for </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/choosing-local-renewable-power-one-california-community-leader-collective-action/">Choosing Local (Renewable) Power: One California Community A Leader In Collective Action</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/28/choosing-local-renewable-power-one-california-community-leader-collective-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Practicum Warns AB 2145 Might Render CCAs Ineffective</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermosa Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA Practicum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the Eco Report Every year, fourth-year students from UCLA’s B.S. Environmental Science Program do a practicum with outside partners, and this year’s project explored ways to decarbonize the electricity supply for the city of Hermosa Beach. The students recommended forming a community choice aggregate (CCA), depending on what the California legislature does, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/">UCLA Practicum Warns AB 2145 Might Render CCAs Ineffective</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E Answers Questions about Community Choice Aggregation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoma Clean Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the ECOreport Some call California&#8217;s Assembly Bill 2145 &#8220;the Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; or a &#8220;CCA killer.&#8221; They believe that it was designed to protect large utilities like Pacific Gas &#38; Electric (PG&#38;E) from communities that would prefer to form their own utilities (CCA). The origins of this story go back a few </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/">PG&#038;E Answers Questions about Community Choice Aggregation</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Assembly Duped Badly Regarding Community Choice Aggregation Bill</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Environmental Hero Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Muratsuchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOHICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Hoffa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhattan Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MB2025 Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sona Kalapura Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoma Clean Power Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA Luskin report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Creative Greenius. This political primary season just keeps getting weirder and weirder. Imagine my surprise on Friday afternoon when my cell phone rang and it was Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi on the line calling to tell me he had made a big mistake and that he was sorry. He wanted me to know </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/">California Assembly Duped Badly Regarding Community Choice Aggregation Bill</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/03/al-muratsuchi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act&#8221; Just A Revamp Of Prop 16?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published in the ECOreport. A member of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245, Hunter Stern, recently sent Marin County residents an email supporting state Assembly Bill 2145, popularly called the “Monopoly Protection Act.” According to the PACIFIC SUN, it is “filled with misinformation” – but the real problem is that it may </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/">Is California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act&#8221; Just A Revamp Of Prop 16?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/19/californias-monopoly-protection-act-just-revamp-prop-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cities Getting Local Energy Choice with Aggregation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/cities-getting-local-energy-choice-with-aggregation/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/cities-getting-local-energy-choice-with-aggregation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralized clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralized energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Over 200 Illinois towns helped cut their citizens&#8217; electric bills in 2012, and some even achieved 100% renewable energy, thanks to a state law that lets cities choose their electricity provider. The law, called community choice aggregation, lets municipalities pick from competitive electricity suppliers for their residential and small business customers, but without having </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/cities-getting-local-energy-choice-with-aggregation/">Cities Getting Local Energy Choice with Aggregation</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/cities-getting-local-energy-choice-with-aggregation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Community Choice Aggregation Lets Cities Buy (Cleaner) Electricity in Bulk</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/22/community-choice-aggregation-lets-cities-buy-cleaner-electricity-in-bulk/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/22/community-choice-aggregation-lets-cities-buy-cleaner-electricity-in-bulk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; In 30 states, citizens have just one choice for their electricity service.  It&#8217;s like the old communist truism: &#8220;you can have any color car you want, as long as it&#8217;s red.&#8221;  What if citizens could collectively shop around for electricity in bulk to get lower prices and cleaner, local power? In six states, they </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/22/community-choice-aggregation-lets-cities-buy-cleaner-electricity-in-bulk/">Community Choice Aggregation Lets Cities Buy (Cleaner) Electricity in Bulk</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/22/community-choice-aggregation-lets-cities-buy-cleaner-electricity-in-bulk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
