<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; CCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/cca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Same Price, More Renewables – San Diego’s Fight for Community Controlled Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“San Diego and its community choice energy district would be able to offer a diverse energy mix with all of the solar, biodiesel, biogas, and energy storage resources that we have in San Diego.  A product that is price competitive and yet at the same time would strive for and achieve a higher level of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/">Same Price, More Renewables – San Diego’s Fight for Community Controlled Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/price-renewables-san-diegos-fight-community-controlled-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/local-energy-rules-lane-sharman-ep23-2014-0605.mp3" length="13764985" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Renewable Energy Industry In Hot Water</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Shorten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Authority.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clive Palmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dual Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GGEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Green Economy Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palmer United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It will come as no surprise to most to read that the Australian renewable energy industry is in hot water &#8212; and like the unlucky frog from urban legends, the water is steadily boiling the industry alive. Mixed metaphors aside, this week has seen several indicators to back up the hyperbole that has been thrashing </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/">Australian Renewable Energy Industry In Hot Water</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local, 33% Renewable, Lower Prices. Sonoma Clean (Community) Power Has Launched</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onshore Wind Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Starting this May, 20,000 Sonoma County, CA, electricity customers are getting renewable power at a lower cost than from their previous electric utility, Pacific Gas &#38; Electric. The portion of renewable electricity (“CleanStart”) for the average customer will rise by 50%. For those so motivated – 3% of customers already – it’s also possible to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/">Local, 33% Renewable, Lower Prices. Sonoma Clean (Community) Power Has Launched</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/local-33-renewable-lower-prices-sonoma-clean-community-power-launched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; AB 2145, Is Dead</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California For Energy Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lane Sharman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Hastings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the ECOreport California’s monopoly utilities failed in what many perceive as their latest attempt to squash community choice aggregates. Assemblyman Steven Bradford could not find a senator willing to sponsor his controversial bill, so it expired when the legislature’s current session ended, at 3 am on Saturday morning. California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; AB </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/">California&#8217;s &#8220;Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; AB 2145, Is Dead</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/04/californias-monopoly-protection-bill-ab-2145-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Practicum Warns AB 2145 Might Render CCAs Ineffective</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermosa Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA Practicum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=68336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the Eco Report Every year, fourth-year students from UCLA’s B.S. Environmental Science Program do a practicum with outside partners, and this year’s project explored ways to decarbonize the electricity supply for the city of Hermosa Beach. The students recommended forming a community choice aggregate (CCA), depending on what the California legislature does, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/">UCLA Practicum Warns AB 2145 Might Render CCAs Ineffective</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/19/ucla-practicum-warns-ab-2145-might-render-ccas-ineffective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E Answers Questions about Community Choice Aggregation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 2145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California community choice utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community choice aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marin clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoma Clean Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally Published in the ECOreport Some call California&#8217;s Assembly Bill 2145 &#8220;the Monopoly Protection Act,&#8221; or a &#8220;CCA killer.&#8221; They believe that it was designed to protect large utilities like Pacific Gas &#38; Electric (PG&#38;E) from communities that would prefer to form their own utilities (CCA). The origins of this story go back a few </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/">PG&#038;E Answers Questions about Community Choice Aggregation</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/05/pge-answers-questions-community-choice-aggregation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany: Fossil Fuel Industry Decline Is Unstoppable</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/07/germany-fossil-fuel-industry-decline-unstoppable/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/07/germany-fossil-fuel-industry-decline-unstoppable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles Parkinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Energy Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=63539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on RenewEconomy. German energy giant RWE has taken a massive loss of €2.8 billion – it’s first loss in 60 years – after admitting it got its strategy wrong, and should have focused more on renewable and distributed energy rather than conventional fossil fuels. RWE, like other major German utilities, has spent much </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/07/germany-fossil-fuel-industry-decline-unstoppable/">Germany: Fossil Fuel Industry Decline Is Unstoppable</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/07/germany-fossil-fuel-industry-decline-unstoppable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
