<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Austin Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/tag/austin-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Austin Raises Solar Goal To 950 MW By 2025</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/austin-raises-solar-goal-950-mw-2025/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/austin-raises-solar-goal-950-mw-2025/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake Richardson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Solar Love. Recently, the city of Austin raised its solar power goal from 200 MW by 2020 to 950 MW by 2025. 200 MW of this solar power will be operating within Austin&#8217;s city limits and 750 MW will be utility-scale solar. Actually, the goal for Austin is at least 950 MW. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/austin-raises-solar-goal-950-mw-2025/">Austin Raises Solar Goal To 950 MW By 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/austin-raises-solar-goal-950-mw-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleantech News: Solar- &amp; EV-Loving Tea Partier Podcast, Barcelona Solar, &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorcycles + Scooters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigant Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy EVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jay leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno Harley-Davidson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno Harley-Davidson LiveWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla Model S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another cleantech news roundup. I&#8217;m making it a short one since I&#8217;m *trying* to start doing these once a day again. Wish me luck! Cleantech News Pie (i.e. solar + EVs + other) I was interviewed for another podcast recently. The interesting thing about this one is that it is conducted by a libertarian, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/">Cleantech News: Solar- &#038; EV-Loving Tea Partier Podcast, Barcelona Solar, &#8230;</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/13/cleantech-news-solar-ev-loving-tea-partier-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are VOSTs Needed To End Subsidies To Non-Solar Customers?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossborder Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rabago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Alliance for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Brian Orion Utilities across the country have been fighting to curtail net energy metering (NEM) programs in favor of value of solar tariff (VOST) programs, claiming that NEM results in a cost-shift to non-solar customers. However, NEM programs may actually undercompensate solar customers for the true value their systems provide, resulting in a substantial </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/">Are VOSTs Needed To End Subsidies To Non-Solar Customers?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/vosts-needed-end-subsidies-non-solar-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SunShot Shows How Much VC Investors Are Missing Out</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/29/sunshot-vc-investors-missing-out/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/29/sunshot-vc-investors-missing-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 11:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Coral Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minh Le]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy Technologies Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sungevity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunShot Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on SolarWakeup. By Yann Brandt On a day when the&#160;Wall Street Journal sings the praise&#160;of how much capital is flowing to solar companies like SunRun and Sungevity, Minh Le, director of the Solar Energy Technologies Office, stands before a group of over 800 participants of the SunShot Summit. As the Department of Energy </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/29/sunshot-vc-investors-missing-out/">SunShot Shows How Much VC Investors Are Missing Out</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/29/sunshot-vc-investors-missing-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin&#8217;s Super Cheap Solar Agreement (5¢/kWh) Goes To Recurrent Energy, Not SunEdison</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/austin-energy-cheap-solar-5-cents-kwh-recurrent-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/austin-energy-cheap-solar-5-cents-kwh-recurrent-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 10:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arno Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy General Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Weis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recurrent Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was announced in March&#160;that Austin Energy would likely be buying electricity from a SunEdison solar power plant for less than 5¢/kWh under a 25-year power purchase agreement (PPA). If you&#8217;re not familiar with electricity prices, that&#8217;s really low. The final deal was just completed last week but with an&#160;unanticipated move&#160;&#8212; Austin Energy&#160;closed negotiations with </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/austin-energy-cheap-solar-5-cents-kwh-recurrent-energy/">Austin&#8217;s Super Cheap Solar Agreement (5¢/kWh) Goes To Recurrent Energy, Not SunEdison</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/21/austin-energy-cheap-solar-5-cents-kwh-recurrent-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Less Than 5¢/kWh In Austin, Texas! (Cheaper Than Natural Gas, Coal, &amp; Nuclear)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/13/solar-sold-less-5%c2%a2kwh-austin-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/13/solar-sold-less-5%c2%a2kwh-austin-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTM Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar prices Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunEdison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=63863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a milestone to mark. Solar power is apparently going to be sold to Austin Energy for a tiny bit less than 5¢/kWh under a new 25-year power purchase agreement (PPA) with SunEdison. Austin Energy says the deal will even lower electric rates a bit. It&#8217;s from no small project either. It&#8217;s from two solar </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/13/solar-sold-less-5%c2%a2kwh-austin-texas/">Solar Less Than 5¢/kWh In Austin, Texas! (Cheaper Than Natural Gas, Coal, &#038; Nuclear)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/13/solar-sold-less-5%c2%a2kwh-austin-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 50 Solar Energy Stories Of The Year (Part Five: #41-50)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Solar Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford SunPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany US Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany vs US solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Renewable Energy Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRENA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin america solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lbnl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merit order effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MyEnergi Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan SunPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV Solar Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real goods solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Resources Atlas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart car solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPIEGEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiegel clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiegel renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiegel solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superchargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supercharges solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla solarcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uc davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Davis smart home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Davis solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US solar grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Solar Grid Parity Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Renewable Energy Resources Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(If you&#8217;ve read the intro 4 times already, just skip to the final 10 articles.) We&#8217;re trying to get more solar energy stories going over on Planetsave. To catch readers up, I&#8217;m doing a short series on the top 50 solar energy stories of 2013 so far. Learning from the Top 33 EV Stories article I recently published, </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/">Top 50 Solar Energy Stories Of The Year (Part Five: #41-50)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/03/top-50-solar-energy-stories-of-the-year-part-five-41-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Solar Energy Industries Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value fo solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote a long post on the idea of using a &#8220;value of solar&#8221; policy instead of various types of government incentives for solar. Much of that post was based on research conducted by Clean Power Research for Austin Energy &#8212; so that Austin Energy could implement a Value of Solar policy (which it </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/">The “Value Of Solar” Could Be Worth Much More Than Austin Energy Pays</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/21/the-value-of-solar-could-be-worth-much-more-than-austin-energy-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Value Of Solar Tariffs &#8212; The Way To Go?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/10/value-of-solar-tariffs/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/10/value-of-solar-tariffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy solar value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Value of Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Value of Solar Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy Value of Solar Tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy VOST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Local Self Reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[true value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Albany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of solar tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a certain issue regarding solar policy that often gets to me. I&#8217;ve tackled it in several ways, but the policy idea below is one of the more intriguing of options, in my opinion. It stems from research done by academics from the University of Albany, George Washington University, and Clean Power Research; an article </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/10/value-of-solar-tariffs/">Value Of Solar Tariffs &#8212; The Way To Go?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/10/value-of-solar-tariffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin Neighborhood a Smart-Grid Laboratory</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/07/austin-neighborhood-a-smart-grid-laboratory/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/07/austin-neighborhood-a-smart-grid-laboratory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart grid laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart grid tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are a few real-world smart-grid laboratories out there. Every time I read about one, I wish I were a participant! Here&#8217;s the scoop on a new one in Austin, Texas (via sister site Insteading): Unique Austin Neighborhood Doubles As Lab For Smart Grid Experiment (via Insteading)</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/07/austin-neighborhood-a-smart-grid-laboratory/">Austin Neighborhood a Smart-Grid Laboratory</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/07/austin-neighborhood-a-smart-grid-laboratory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>115-MW Solar Power Project (+ 5 More Large Solar Power Projects)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/10/115-mw-solar-power-project-5-more-large-solar-power-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/10/115-mw-solar-power-project-5-more-large-solar-power-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhopal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDF Energies Nouvelles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Itlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large solar projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marguerite Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesquite Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesquite Solar 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesquite Solar I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.A.G. Solarstrom AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solarstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toul-Rosières]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toul-Rosières solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toul-Rosières solar power project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toul-Rosières solar project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Wind Energy Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yabucoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yabucoa Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>7 more big solar projects, the first one being a behemoth of a solar power plant: 1. Marguerite Fund acquires 36 MW of ginormous, 115-MW Toul-Rosières solar power project. This 115-MW solar power plant, if built today, would be the world&#8217;s largest solar PV project (scroll down to the bottom of that page to see the current list </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/10/115-mw-solar-power-project-5-more-large-solar-power-projects/">115-MW Solar Power Project (+ 5 More Large Solar Power Projects)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/10/115-mw-solar-power-project-5-more-large-solar-power-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utility CEOs Talk Solar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/21/utility-ceos-talk-solar/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/21/utility-ceos-talk-solar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEP Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPS energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pse&g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSEG Energy Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSEG Services Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility ceos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility ceos solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility ceos solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility ceos solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility company ceos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting part of this year's Solar Power International conference was a roundtable of 7 utility company CEOs (starts about 18 and a half minutes into the video). I watched most of the discussion 3 times (while doing other things, of course). These are not just solar industry cheerleaders, but they know our electricity system about as well as anybody and are leaders in their arena. So, it was really interesting to watch them speak for over an hour on solar power</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/21/utility-ceos-talk-solar/">Utility CEOs Talk Solar</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/21/utility-ceos-talk-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Preps for the Debut of the Plug-in Car by Wooing Electric Companies</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/23/gm-preps-for-the-debut-of-the-plug-in-car-by-wooing-electric-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/23/gm-preps-for-the-debut-of-the-plug-in-car-by-wooing-electric-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Carlisle Bolton]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevy Volt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturn Vue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In order to usher in the Chevy Volt, due out in 2010, General Motors is partnering with 30 utility companies across 40 states to ensure that the infrastructure to support the new model will exist. This is great news for the Toyota RAV4 drivers who have been driving electric cars for the last decade. Of </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/23/gm-preps-for-the-debut-of-the-plug-in-car-by-wooing-electric-companies/">GM Preps for the Debut of the Plug-in Car by Wooing Electric Companies</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/23/gm-preps-for-the-debut-of-the-plug-in-car-by-wooing-electric-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
