<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Carbon Pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/category/policy-politics/carbon-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>India Coal Tax Has Collected $2.85 Billion</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/25/india-coal-tax-collected-2-85-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/25/india-coal-tax-collected-2-85-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smiti Mittal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy Cess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India Coal Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Clean Energy Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Solar Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultra Mega Solar Power Projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>India has managed to generate $2.85 billion in revenue from clean energy cess (taxes) it had introduced in 2010, essentially a coal tax. India&#8217;s plans to significantly boost renewable energy infrastructure over the next few years has got a shot in the arm as the government recently announced that it has about $2.85 billion in </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/25/india-coal-tax-collected-2-85-billion/">India Coal Tax Has Collected $2.85 Billion</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/25/india-coal-tax-collected-2-85-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will EU Emission Trading Remain A Major Source Of Low-Carbon Finance?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/20/will-eu-emission-trading-remain-major-source-low-carbon-finance/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/20/will-eu-emission-trading-remain-major-source-low-carbon-finance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 07:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emil Dimantchev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EnergyPost. By Emil Dimantchev Last year for the first time many of the CO2 allowances in the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) were auctioned rather than handed out for free. Surprisingly perhaps, the EU member states used much more of the ETS revenues for low-carbon development than EU law suggests they should. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/20/will-eu-emission-trading-remain-major-source-low-carbon-finance/">Will EU Emission Trading Remain A Major Source Of Low-Carbon Finance?</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/20/will-eu-emission-trading-remain-major-source-low-carbon-finance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balkan Countries Agree To EU 2030 Clean Energy, Emission Reduction Targets</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/balkan-countries-agree-eu-2030-clean-energy-emission-reduction-targets/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/balkan-countries-agree-eu-2030-clean-energy-emission-reduction-targets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU emissions reduction target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Energy Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macedonia Climate Change Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia Climate Change Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Prospective members of the European Union have agreed to honour the targets to enhance renewable energy, energy efficiency, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that were recently agreed to by the EU for 2030. Balkan countries have pledged to meet the targets to reduce GHG emissions by 40% by 1990 levels, increase their share of renewable </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/balkan-countries-agree-eu-2030-clean-energy-emission-reduction-targets/">Balkan Countries Agree To EU 2030 Clean Energy, Emission Reduction Targets</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/balkan-countries-agree-eu-2030-clean-energy-emission-reduction-targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Now Has A Carbon Trading Scheme, But Nobody Seems To Have Noticed</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/australia-now-carbon-trading-scheme-nobody-seems-noticed/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/australia-now-carbon-trading-scheme-nobody-seems-noticed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emission Reduction Fund (ERF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safeguard Mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Nick Xenophon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on RenewEconomy. By Nathan Lim Senator Nick Xenophon has brought back a carbon trading scheme to Australia and nobody seems to have noticed. Quietly tucked behind the headlines from the Palmer United Party and the government was the mention of Senator Xenophon inserting a ‘Safeguard Mechanism’ into the Direct Action legislation. The mechanism </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/australia-now-carbon-trading-scheme-nobody-seems-noticed/">Australia Now Has A Carbon Trading Scheme, But Nobody Seems To Have Noticed</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/19/australia-now-carbon-trading-scheme-nobody-seems-noticed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Powered Cars, Top Solar Stocks (+ Other Solar Stories)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concentrating Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdfunding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energiewende]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-Ion Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Thermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tidal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wave Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feldheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kohl's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kohl's solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nextera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off grid solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar WiFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRP Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In case you just can&#8217;t get enough solar news, analysis, and commentary, here&#8217;s a big link drop of good solar stories we haven&#8217;t already covered on CleanTechnica. Solar powered cars, solar trees, top solar stocks, and much, much more. Enjoy! Fun Solar EV Charging Rocks, But Which Option To Choose? Solar Trees For Solar-Powered EVs Solar </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/">Solar Powered Cars, Top Solar Stocks (+ Other Solar Stories)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/16/solar-powered-cars-solar-news-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use Drop In Oil Prices To Put A Price On Carbon, Says IEA Director</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/use-drop-oil-prices-put-price-carbon-says-iea-director/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/use-drop-oil-prices-put-price-carbon-says-iea-director/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Energy Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria van der Hoeven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price on carbon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on EnergyPost. By Maria van der Hoeven With the drop in oil prices “delivering a shot of economic stimulus to consumers around the world”, policymakers have a “once-in-a-generation” chance to take actions to cut our reliance on fossil fuels, writes Maria van der Hoeven, Executive Director of the International Energy Agency (IEA). She urges </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/use-drop-oil-prices-put-price-carbon-says-iea-director/">Use Drop In Oil Prices To Put A Price On Carbon, Says IEA Director</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/use-drop-oil-prices-put-price-carbon-says-iea-director/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>North America's carbon markets just completed the first international cap-and-trade system linkage and raised $500 million for clean energy investment</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/">Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia &#8212; The Land Of Backward Policies &amp; Contradictions</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/australia-land-backward-policies-contradictions/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/australia-land-backward-policies-contradictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Performance Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Bishop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Climate Change Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In what may have been the only way to confidently convince Australia&#8217;s leadership that they were taking a dramatically wrong turn on environmental and energy policy, global opinion has turned against the country at a time when the climate talks in Lima, Peru, have kept such issues at the top of everyone&#8217;s minds. Tracking the </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/australia-land-backward-policies-contradictions/">Australia &#8212; The Land Of Backward Policies &#038; Contradictions</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/11/australia-land-backward-policies-contradictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Be A Clean Energy Leader, Canada Needs To Get In The Game</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/08/clean-energy-leader-canada-needs-get-game/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/08/clean-energy-leader-canada-needs-get-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy L Hales]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brookfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enbridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiera Axium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manulife Financial Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merran Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mizuho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MUFG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORD/LB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracking the Energy Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransAlta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransCanada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While private financial institutions &#038; businesses are investing to make Canada a clean energy leader - which citizens want - Ottawa drags it feet</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/08/clean-energy-leader-canada-needs-get-game/">To Be A Clean Energy Leader, Canada Needs To Get In The Game</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/08/clean-energy-leader-canada-needs-get-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SolarChat on US Solar Policy &#8212; The Results</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhone Resch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solarchat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Solar Love. A couple weeks ago, I was the &#8220;featured journalist&#8221; on a massive&#160;#SolarChat on Twitter, the biggest yet. Senator Harry Reid joined in, as did the CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, Rhone Resch; OFA Climate Change Campaign Manager JackShapiro; Founder of Climate Hawks Vote RL Miller; and Greentech Media </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/">#SolarChat on US Solar Policy &#8212; The Results</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>67% Of Americans Support Federal CO2 Regulations</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emission from existing coal-fired power plants.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtail carbon pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama’s Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict limits for carbon emission from existing coal-fired power plants.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union of Concerned Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale Project on Climate Change Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congress can while away the hours debating over EPA regulations. It seems to be the plan of some congresspeople who would rather see a broken government than a useful one. However, they should note that a strong majority of Americans support strict limits on carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants, even existing plants. The Yale Project on </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/">67% Of Americans Support Federal CO2 Regulations</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian CO2 Emissions:  A Perspective</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/20/canadian-co2-emissions-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/20/canadian-co2-emissions-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Grinwis]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CleanTechnica Exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada CO2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Where are Canadian CO2 Emissions Coming From? I ended up digging a little bit into Canadian CO2 emissions after my last article, and thought that our readers might find it interesting&#8230;. This article relies heavily on the Government of Canada publication titled &#8220;Canada&#8217;s Emissions Trends,&#8221; which the government put together as a response to climate change </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/20/canadian-co2-emissions-perspective/">Canadian CO2 Emissions:  A Perspective</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/20/canadian-co2-emissions-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G20 Energy Conclusions Not Quite &#8220;Business As Usual&#8221; (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/g20-energy-conclusions-quite-business-usual-video/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/g20-energy-conclusions-quite-business-usual-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In paragraph 17 of the official communique that ended the G20 summit yesterday, the group of most powerful nations stated flatly: “Increased collaboration on energy is a priority. Global energy markets are undergoing significant transformation.” At the Brisbane, Australia meeting, the group of world leaders asserted that strong and resilient energy markets are critical to global </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/g20-energy-conclusions-quite-business-usual-video/">G20 Energy Conclusions Not Quite &#8220;Business As Usual&#8221; (VIDEO)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/18/g20-energy-conclusions-quite-business-usual-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Moves Post-2020 While Australia Remains Fixated On 2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/11/world-moves-post-2020-australia-remains-fixated-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/11/world-moves-post-2020-australia-remains-fixated-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 06:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Hueston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Climate Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Climate Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Flannery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That I am at loggerheads with the environmental and energy-related policies of the Australian Government is of no surprise to anyone who has spent much time here at CleanTechnica. As an Australian working for a US-based, international-focused website, the ability to comment on Australia&#8217;s current politics from an international perspective is incredibly helpful, while simultaneously depressing. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/11/world-moves-post-2020-australia-remains-fixated-2020/">The World Moves Post-2020 While Australia Remains Fixated On 2020</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/11/world-moves-post-2020-australia-remains-fixated-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia On A One-Way Road To Carbon Pariah</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/australia-one-way-road-carbon-pariah/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/australia-one-way-road-carbon-pariah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthesis Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=74466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By now you have surely heard of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change&#8217;s latest synthesis report and the increased clamour of claims to eradicate fossil fuels by the end of this century in a near-vain attempt to keep warming to within 2ºC over pre-industrial times. The report is the summary of the IPCC Fifth Assessment </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/australia-one-way-road-carbon-pariah/">Australia On A One-Way Road To Carbon Pariah</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/04/australia-one-way-road-carbon-pariah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Renewable Energy Industry In Hot Water</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua S Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Shorten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Authority.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clive Palmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dual Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GGEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Green Economy Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palmer United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It will come as no surprise to most to read that the Australian renewable energy industry is in hot water &#8212; and like the unlucky frog from urban legends, the water is steadily boiling the industry alive. Mixed metaphors aside, this week has seen several indicators to back up the hyperbole that has been thrashing </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/">Australian Renewable Energy Industry In Hot Water</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/22/australian-renewable-energy-industry-hot-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China To Phase Out Financial Support For Solar Power Sector By 2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Emissions Intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china emissions trading scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar Feed-in Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar Power Targets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the most aggressive and ambitious capacity addition targets in the solar power sector, China may soon see the technology mature enough to pull the high financial support currently on offer. Recent media reports quoting Chinese officials abreast with information about the solar power policy in the 13th Five Year Plan (2016-2020) state that financial </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/">China To Phase Out Financial Support For Solar Power Sector By 2020</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Slaps Tax On Coal Imports</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/10/china-slaps-tax-coal-imports/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/10/china-slaps-tax-coal-imports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brakels]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Robb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Trade Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China coal tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreamland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulphur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>China has announced it will reintroduce import tariffs of 6% a tonne on thermal coal used to generate electricity and a 3% a tonne on metallurgical coal used to smelt iron. The tariffs are not new but a return to those that were in place when China first began to import significant quantities of coal. </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/10/china-slaps-tax-coal-imports/">China Slaps Tax On Coal Imports</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/10/china-slaps-tax-coal-imports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poland&#8217;s Veto Threat To Higher EU Emission Reduction Targets Could Derail Global Climate Treaty</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu co2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU CO2 emissions reduction target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU CO2 emissions reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewa Kopacz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Poland is at it again &#8212; threatening to derail any potential progress that the European Union can make before the world sits to agree on an international climate change agreement next year. Poland&#8217;s new prime minister has stated that she could veto a proposal by the EU to increase the emissions reduction target. Several EU </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/">Poland&#8217;s Veto Threat To Higher EU Emission Reduction Targets Could Derail Global Climate Treaty</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Has Slipped Below Algeria, Myanmar In Renewable Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 06:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Low-Carbon Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myanmar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uruguay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once a leader in renewable energy investment, Australia now lags behind developing countries such as Algeria, Myanmar, and Thailand</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/">Australia Has Slipped Below Algeria, Myanmar In Renewable Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
