<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CleanTechnica &#187; Cap And Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/category/policy-politics/carbon-pricing/cap-and-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=76373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>North America's carbon markets just completed the first international cap-and-trade system linkage and raised $500 million for clean energy investment</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/">Carbon Markets Link In $500 Million Clean Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/15/carbon-markets-link-in-500-million-clean-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SolarChat on US Solar Policy &#8212; The Results</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhone Resch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solarchat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Solar Love. A couple weeks ago, I was the &#8220;featured journalist&#8221; on a massive&#160;#SolarChat on Twitter, the biggest yet. Senator Harry Reid joined in, as did the CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, Rhone Resch; OFA Climate Change Campaign Manager JackShapiro; Founder of Climate Hawks Vote RL Miller; and Greentech Media </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/">#SolarChat on US Solar Policy &#8212; The Results</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/30/solarchat-us-solar-policy-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>67% Of Americans Support Federal CO2 Regulations</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emission from existing coal-fired power plants.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtail carbon pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama’s Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict limits for carbon emission from existing coal-fired power plants.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union of Concerned Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale Project on Climate Change Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=75303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congress can while away the hours debating over EPA regulations. It seems to be the plan of some congresspeople who would rather see a broken government than a useful one. However, they should note that a strong majority of Americans support strict limits on carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants, even existing plants. The Yale Project on </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/">67% Of Americans Support Federal CO2 Regulations</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/11/24/67-americans-support-federal-co2-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China To Phase Out Financial Support For Solar Power Sector By 2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed In Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Emissions Intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china emissions trading scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar Feed-in Tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar Power Targets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the most aggressive and ambitious capacity addition targets in the solar power sector, China may soon see the technology mature enough to pull the high financial support currently on offer. Recent media reports quoting Chinese officials abreast with information about the solar power policy in the 13th Five Year Plan (2016-2020) state that financial </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/">China To Phase Out Financial Support For Solar Power Sector By 2020</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/17/china-phase-financial-support-solar-power-sector-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poland&#8217;s Veto Threat To Higher EU Emission Reduction Targets Could Derail Global Climate Treaty</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu co2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU CO2 emissions reduction target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU CO2 emissions reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewa Kopacz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=73043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Poland is at it again &#8212; threatening to derail any potential progress that the European Union can make before the world sits to agree on an international climate change agreement next year. Poland&#8217;s new prime minister has stated that she could veto a proposal by the EU to increase the emissions reduction target. Several EU </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/">Poland&#8217;s Veto Threat To Higher EU Emission Reduction Targets Could Derail Global Climate Treaty</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/08/polands-veto-threat-higher-eu-emission-reduction-targets-derail-global-climate-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Has Slipped Below Algeria, Myanmar In Renewable Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 06:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BNEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Low-Carbon Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Renewable Energy Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myanmar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uruguay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once a leader in renewable energy investment, Australia now lags behind developing countries such as Algeria, Myanmar, and Thailand</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/">Australia Has Slipped Below Algeria, Myanmar In Renewable Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/06/australia-slipped-algeria-myanmar-renewable-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aviation Industry Pledges To Reduce 2050 Emissions To 2005 Levels</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/01/aviation-emissions-reduction-2050/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/01/aviation-emissions-reduction-2050/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airports Council International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Air Navigation Services Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP 21 Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Stop The Clock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Air Transport Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Civil Aviation Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Climate Change Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The air travel sector has committed to reducing aviation emissions to 2005 levels by 2050 during the UN Climate Summit last month</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/01/aviation-emissions-reduction-2050/">Aviation Industry Pledges To Reduce 2050 Emissions To 2005 Levels</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/10/01/aviation-emissions-reduction-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Sets Coal Consumption Standards For Power Plants</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/china-sets-coal-consumption-standards-power-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/china-sets-coal-consumption-standards-power-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 05:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing Coal Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Coal Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Coal Consumption Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China coal power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china emissions trading scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Environment Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Development and Reform Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>China has set coal consumption standards for power plants designed to limit air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/china-sets-coal-consumption-standards-power-plants/">China Sets Coal Consumption Standards For Power Plants</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/china-sets-coal-consumption-standards-power-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s Per Capita Emissions Have Exceeded Those Of Europe</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/23/chinas-per-capita-emissions-exceeded-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/23/chinas-per-capita-emissions-exceeded-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Per Capita Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cop 20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe Per Capita Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG Emissions 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Carbon Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global GHG Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Per Capita Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 GHG Emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>China has argued for years that its low per capita emissions excused it from greenhouse gas regulation. But now, its emissions exceed those of the </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/23/chinas-per-capita-emissions-exceeded-europe/">China’s Per Capita Emissions Have Exceeded Those Of Europe</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/23/chinas-per-capita-emissions-exceeded-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kazakhstan Outlines 2020 Renewable Energy Targets</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/17/kazakhstan-outlines-2020-renewable-energy-targets/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/17/kazakhstan-outlines-2020-renewable-energy-targets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 05:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kazakhstan carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kazakhstan carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=72018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Central Asian country Kazakhstan is looking hard at its heavy dependence on coal &#038; setting an ambitious long term renewable energy target for </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/17/kazakhstan-outlines-2020-renewable-energy-targets/">Kazakhstan Outlines 2020 Renewable Energy Targets</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/17/kazakhstan-outlines-2020-renewable-energy-targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Carbon Markets Just Dropped $400 Million On Clean Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/05/u-s-carbon-markets-just-dropped-400-million-clean-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/05/u-s-carbon-markets-just-dropped-400-million-clean-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Air Resources Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California and Northeast U.S. carbon markets just invested $400 million in cap-and-trade revenue in clean energy, efficiency, and emissions reductions</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/05/u-s-carbon-markets-just-dropped-400-million-clean-energy/">U.S. Carbon Markets Just Dropped $400 Million On Clean Energy</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/05/u-s-carbon-markets-just-dropped-400-million-clean-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No-Brainer Proven: Cap-And-Trade Saves 10x Its Cost In Health Benefits</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/27/cap-and-trade-saves-10x-its-cost-in-health-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/27/cap-and-trade-saves-10x-its-cost-in-health-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Dechert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-benefit analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions reduction policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel economy standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noelle E. Selin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution-related illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed power plant rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca K. Saari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastian Rausch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sick days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tammy M. Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US carbon emissions policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vehicle emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=71083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever thought that the health benefits of reducing emitted carbon might pay for the costs associated with implementing clean air policies? A new study, published online Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change, has found that savings from health benefits dwarf the estimated $14 billion cost of a cap-and-trade program. It says the health </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/27/cap-and-trade-saves-10x-its-cost-in-health-benefits/">No-Brainer Proven: Cap-And-Trade Saves 10x Its Cost In Health Benefits</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/27/cap-and-trade-saves-10x-its-cost-in-health-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hareon Solar To Invest $1 Billion On Distributed Solar Power Projects In China</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/hareon-solar-invest-1-billion-distributed-solar-power-projects-china/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/hareon-solar-invest-1-billion-distributed-solar-power-projects-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mridul Chadha]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleantech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-dumping Duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Solar Power Targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hareon Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hebei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Grid Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=70275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Chinese solar company Hareon Solar plans to take advantage of government investment incentives with its plan for a $1 billion distributed solar project</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/hareon-solar-invest-1-billion-distributed-solar-power-projects-china/">Hareon Solar To Invest $1 Billion On Distributed Solar Power Projects In China</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/06/hareon-solar-invest-1-billion-distributed-solar-power-projects-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey Haters, RGGI Cap And Trade Powered 800 MW New Renewables in 2013</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 17:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Council On Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decarbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Brower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Green Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York State solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJM Interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale gas boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=69261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Northeast U.S. cap-and-trade system helped install 800MW new renewables capacity in 2013, showing states how EPA's proposed emissions rule can succeed</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/">Hey Haters, RGGI Cap And Trade Powered 800 MW New Renewables in 2013</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/08/hey-haters-rggi-cap-and-trade-powered-800mw-new-renewables-in-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s Market Based Economy Must Have a Price on Carbon Dioxide Emissions</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/01/americas-market-based-economy-must-price-carbon-dioxide-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/01/americas-market-based-economy-must-price-carbon-dioxide-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA power plant emissions rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[externalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC AR5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Climate Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you believe in capitalism and free markets then you believe in a price on carbon dioxide emissions. The only question is what that price should be</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/01/americas-market-based-economy-must-price-carbon-dioxide-emissions/">America&#8217;s Market Based Economy Must Have a Price on Carbon Dioxide Emissions</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/06/01/americas-market-based-economy-must-price-carbon-dioxide-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Just Made A Bigger Carbon Market Move Than Obama&#8217;s EPA Rules</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/china-just-made-bigger-carbon-market-move-obamas-epa-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/china-just-made-bigger-carbon-market-move-obamas-epa-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 19:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvio Marcacci]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA emissions rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=67631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama's pending power plant emissions rules are getting all the attention, but China may have just made an even bigger carbon market policy move</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/china-just-made-bigger-carbon-market-move-obamas-epa-rules/">China Just Made A Bigger Carbon Market Move Than Obama&#8217;s EPA Rules</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/30/china-just-made-bigger-carbon-market-move-obamas-epa-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore&#8217;s Excellent Communication Skills</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/al-gores-excellent-communication-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/al-gores-excellent-communication-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 09:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=66319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I just read a wonderful article about and interview with Al Gore on POLITICO. Worth your time, I believe. Al Gore is such an excellent communicator. One of the best out there on the topic of global climate change. If you aren&#8217;t drawn to read the full POLITICO article, here are some key excerpts that </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/al-gores-excellent-communication-skills/">Al Gore&#8217;s Excellent Communication Skills</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/al-gores-excellent-communication-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Carbon Targets &amp; Renewable Energy Targets Highlighted In New Video</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/26/eu-carbon-targets-renewable-energy-targets-highlighted-new-video/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/26/eu-carbon-targets-renewable-energy-targets-highlighted-new-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHEV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DG Clima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU carbon target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU carbon targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU carbon targets 2030]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU climate goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU climate reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU climate reduction goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU climate reduction targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU renewable energy goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu renewable energy target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU renewable energy target 2030]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU renewable energy targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU renewable energy targets 2030]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=63111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on Planetsave. The EU Commission recently proposed new renewable energy and carbon targets. This is great news for Europe. (Well, it would be better if they were a bit more aggressive, but&#8230;.) The new video above from DG Clima gives a good overview of the new targets and some reasons why such targets </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/26/eu-carbon-targets-renewable-energy-targets-highlighted-new-video/">EU Carbon Targets &#038; Renewable Energy Targets Highlighted In New Video</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/26/eu-carbon-targets-renewable-energy-targets-highlighted-new-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$36 Trillion Push For Clean Energy Investment</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/16/ceres-clean-trillion-campaign-for-clean-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/16/ceres-clean-trillion-campaign-for-clean-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Casey]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BICEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ceres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Trillion Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investor Summit on Climate Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom steyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=61394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, the irony. With the devastating coal-related West Virginia chemical spill barely a week behind us, hundreds of leading investment and financial executives gathered at the United Nations for the Investor Summit on Climate Risk on January 15, to focus on the opposite of that: a $36 trillion effort called the Clean Trillion Campaign, to </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/16/ceres-clean-trillion-campaign-for-clean-energy-investment/">$36 Trillion Push For Clean Energy Investment</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/16/ceres-clean-trillion-campaign-for-clean-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cities Take Energy Transition Into Their Own Hands</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/08/cities-take-energy-transition-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/08/cities-take-energy-transition-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles Parkinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap And Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Capital Territory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C40 Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canberra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Corbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=61067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally published on RenewEconomy. In Australia just now, there is an extraordinary contrast unfolding in the heart of Canberra, the nation’s capital. And it is about how government should move forward on climate change and clean energy policies. The newly elected Australian federal government, a conservative coalition, has thrown climate initiatives into reverse, busily unwinding </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/08/cities-take-energy-transition-hands/">Cities Take Energy Transition Into Their Own Hands</a> was originally published on <a href="http://cleantechnica.com">CleanTechnica</a>. </p>
<p>To read more from CleanTechnica, join over 50,000 other subscribers: <a href="https://plus.google.com/+Cleantechnica?prsrc=5">Google+</a> | <a href="http://eepurl.com/csSt9">Email</a> | <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CleanTechnica">Facebook</a> | <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IM-cleantechnica">RSS</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/cleantechnica">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2014/01/08/cities-take-energy-transition-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
