CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power Germany solar panels & flag via Shutterstock

Published on May 25th, 2014 | by Dr. Karl-Friedrich Lenz

3

Germany’s Electricity Ecotax Exemptions Are Not Illegal State Aid

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

May 25th, 2014 by  

Originally published on Lenz Blog.

Here is yet another reason why the reductions German energy intensive industry gets when paying surcharges are not subsidies, and therefore none of the EU Commission’s business.

In more enlightened times, when the Green Party was part of the German government, Germany adopted an ecotax. The idea of that law was to make electricity more expensive. For that purpose, the Electricity Tax Act (Stromsteuergesetz) adds a tax of 20.5 euro per MWh (2.05 cents euro per kWh).

Energy intensive industry gets a reduction of up to 90% of that tax under Article 10 of the Act. And this Article has been changed substantially with effect from 2013. That reform was based partly on an agreement between German industry and the German government of August 1st, 2012.

In that agreement, German industry promises to further reduce energy intensity, by an average of 1.3% each year. The first year this applies is 2015, and the requirement is a reduction of 1.3% compared to the average of the years between 2007 and 2012. Then the goals are 2.6% for 2016, 3.9% for 2017, and 5.25% for 2018.

In consideration, the German government promises to continue the system of tax reductions.

Both parties agree to monitor the results of these efforts by industry, and each pay half of the costs for that monitoring. Professor Frondel at the RWI has secured the project to do this monitoring.

The background to this reform was the fact that the European Commission decided in 2007 that these reductions are not illegal state aid under EU rules (State aid No N 775/2006 – Germany). But that decision was limited until the end of 2012. People thought that without a new system these reductions might disappear completely from 2013 on.

So what has the EU Commission to say about these new rules? Is there any new decision extending the 2007 decision?

I don’t exactly know. The German government has notified the Commission that these measures are not illegal state aid under the General block exemption Regulation 800/2008. That means that the conditions in Article 3 of the reform law are fulfilled and the new law took effect from 2013 on.

I think this is an excellent model to deal with the illegal Commission power grab regarding German feed-in tariff law. Just notify under Regulation 800/2008 that whatever results from the normal democratic legislation process is not illegal state aid under that Regulation. Then wait if the Commission raises any objections, and fight them vigorously once they come.

In contrast, the model economy minister Gabriel has in mind would give the Commission veto power over the result of the German legislative process. I for one don’t think that is appropriate when the legislation in question has nothing to do with state aid in the first place, and is therefore none of the Commission’s business.

 

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , ,


About the Author

is a professor of German and European Law at Aoyama Gakuin University in Tokyo, blogging since 2003 at Lenz Blog. A free PDF file of his global warming science fiction novel "Great News" is available here.



  • Hans

    The RWI is a research society with (energy-) industry groups as members. Previous studies of this institute have been very biased towards the interests of its members. To put such an institute in charge of monitoring the industry is more or less letting the industry monitor itself.

  • JamesWimberley

    Never mind the Commission. Subsidising energy-intensive exporters (and any economist will recognize the tax break as a subsidy) is terrible policy. Germany’s export fetish is selfish and damaging to European neighbours, and also to German consumers. Why insist on staying in energy-intensive low-profit industries like bulk metals and chemicals, where Germany no longer has a comparative advantage? The strength of the many and envied Mittelstand firms that don’t benefit from these breaks lies in design, quality, and know-how. Even Thyssen’s future lies more in lifts than in steel.

  • ThomasGerke

    Sadly, the current German energy minister seems to play the “Commision”-Card to disrupt the democratic process in Germany. (create a false sense of urgency to shut the Germany States & other objections up)

    Using that card is nothing new though. Even before the Renewable Energy Act was inacted, enemies of the FIT tried to use it to prevent the law from taking effect.

    Overall saying “The comission forces us to act” is just embarrassing for a German energy minister. Not only is national energy policy non of the EUCom business, it’s also a field in which nation get their way all the time.

    France has a long tradition to do as they please… avoid opening their market, setting a fixed minimum price for nuclear electricity by law, …. and the UK even wants to get all kinds of subsidies for nuclear now.

    I would hope that the states & the parliament live up to their responsibility and ignore this “EuCom”-Bluff.

Back to Top ↑