CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Fossil Fuels Oil pipeline via Shutterstock

Published on January 11th, 2014 | by Guest Contributor

10

Chris Christie Tries To Shut Up Gas Pipeline Critic

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

January 11th, 2014 by  

Originally published on ThinkProgress.
By Andrew Breiner.

Even after a press conference that passed the 2-hour mark, where New Jersey Governor Chris Christie continued to push the long-discredited idea that the closure of two lanes of the George Washington Bridge may have been part of a traffic study, it was unclear what role the Governor himself may have played in the scandal. But it’s certainly not the first time Christie has been accused of using questionable methods to get ahead politically. And that’s certainly evident in the battle over a natural gas pipeline through New Jersey’s protected Pinelands.

The Pinelands National Reserve was the nation’s first national reserve when it was created in 1978, covers over one million acres of southern New Jersey, and contains an aquifer estimated to hold 17 trillion gallons of water. The Pinelands Commission, the state agency that oversees the reserve, is tasked with only allowing infrastructure that is “intended to primarily serve the needs of the Pinelands,” to be built inside. However, South Jersey Gas is offering $8 million to the commission to get them to approve 22 miles of pipeline that would carry natural gas to the BL England power plant. The Pinelands Preservation Alliance has proposed alternate routes that would not affect the Pinelands.

Four former New Jersey governors wrote to the Pinelands Commission to oppose the pipeline.

Oil pipeline via Shutterstock

Edward Lloyd is an environmental law professor at Columbia University, and a member of the Pinelands Comission who had been asking difficult questions about the proposed pipeline, though he had not openly opposed it. Early in December he got a call from a deputy attorney general saying his position as president of the Eastern Environmental Law Center’s board of directors meant he should recuse himself. The Law Center had sent a letter asking for another public meeting on the pipeline. Then, he got a call from the Pinelands Commission’s ethics lawyer. “On orders of the governor’s office,” she said, according to Lloyd as reported in the New York Times “I went to the State Ethics Commission and they have ordered you to recuse yourself.” The State Ethics Commission’s executive director Peter Tober denied making that order to the Times. The commission is expected to vote Friday, and Mr. Lloyd is as yet unsure whether he will recuse himself.

You don’t have to look far back to see the potential hazards of a pipeline spill or explosion. 2013 saw several huge ones, including a gas pipeline explosion in Milford, Texas that led to the evacuation of the entire town of 700 people. A 30-inch gas pipeline in rural  Missouri exploded late last year, sending a fireball 300 feet into the air that could be seen for miles. It destroyed seven buildings and left a “smoldering moon-like crater” behind.

As a Times of Trenton editorial said, “a natural gas explosion and fire in the Pine Barrens could be disastrous.”

Even though sea level rise makes the storm surges from big coastal storms like Sandy more dangerous, the governor is not serious about addressing climate change. Christie withdrew New Jersey from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a coalition of Northeast states cutting car and power plant pollution, along with greenhouse gas emissions. He called it too costly, while keeping the tens of millions of dollars he took from the fund to help close a budget gap. But a lawsuit from the National Resources Defense Council and Environment New Jersey could require the state to go back to RGGI levels of carbon emissions.

The New Jersey Senate is also attempting to use constitutional amendments to force Christie’s hand and get the state back into the RGGI.

Image Credit: smereka via Shutterstock.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , ,


About the Author

is many, many people. We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people. :D



  • agelbert

    Christie is a thug that strong arms anyone in his (and Wall Street’s) way.

  • Howard Treesong

    It’s as if all these people are hell-bent on destroying everything that’s still valuable in natural habitat and environment in the briefest possible time. If it yields a dollar, they’ll draw a pipe line through their grandmother’s house.

    On top of that these companies are notoriously unscrupulous about saddling the community up with the cost and fall-out of their environmental disasters. It’s like they’re children “Not our fault.” “It was that way before we came here!” “We didn’t do it!” never-ending excuses.

  • Gus Escher

    for Matt… I don’t take a side in this matter right now and I’m not defending Gov. Christie; I do want to simply point out that Prof. Llyod is in fact in a conflict of interest on this issue. His service on the Pinelands Commission requires him to impartially execute the business of the Commission in the broad public interest. His voluntary service as President of the Eastern Environmental Law Center presumable is an advocacy position. These two roles may from time to time come into conflict (i.e. “Who’s side are you on?”). Any reasonable observer would say that he is definitely in conflict in this matter. Thus, he must recuse himself. This is simply the law in NJ. Conflict-of-interest laws vary (greatly) state by state.

    • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

      He benefits financially in no way from his volunteer service with the EELC.

      • Gus Escher

        Good point, but doesn’t matter. In NJ, the Appearance of a conflict is in fact a conflict.

      • Pat Campbell

        I believe Gus is right.
        Its not just a financial determination. The Eastern Environmental Law Center could easily become involved with any decision on this placing the professor on one side or another in possible ensuing litigation.

  • SirSparks

    What terrible pipe seam welding (the circular one in pic.) I would certainly block it’s installation.

    Note the straight line factory weld and how it can be done.

    • Vin

      that’s EXACTLY what I thought (and I’m not even a real welder and that screamed at me)……ALL of those THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of kilometers (miles for you guys) of crappy welds, all the way across america, ready to pop (they do the same depressingly shocking decisions/planning here in Australia)……….PS. (off topic but same basic issue) same goes for filling exhausted Fracking Holes with concrete that IS ONLY RATED FOR 40 YEARS (which IS all Portland Cement is rated for, coz that’s just how long(short) it lasts……though, now they have worked out the ‘Roman Recipe’ they could make them last MUCH longer…2000+ years longer…. but they won’t)

  • Matt

    Wait so if you have any environmental back ground you need to recuse yourself on a vote above if a pipeline is ok environmentally thru a reserve. How does this pipeline serve the reserve in any way, shape, or form? And Gov Christy is one of the GOP front runners for 2016. Yes the campaign as already started.

    • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Shit is crazy. This story is so ridiculous.

Back to Top ↑