<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshore Wind Has Tremendous Investment Potential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of hurricanes.  I stumbled across a list of Atlantic named storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes per year and graphed it out.  


Looks like there&#039;s more storms a-brewin&#039;.  



It&#039;s also interesting that hurricanes seem to be tracking more easterly, more often missing the US coast.


If this keeps up we should hear some statements from climate scientists in a few years.  Not many data points yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of hurricanes.  I stumbled across a list of Atlantic named storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes per year and graphed it out.  </p>
<p>Looks like there&#8217;s more storms a-brewin&#8217;.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting that hurricanes seem to be tracking more easterly, more often missing the US coast.</p>
<p>If this keeps up we should hear some statements from climate scientists in a few years.  Not many data points yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was an earlier wind map in the article which was very incomplete.   It showed no harvestable wind off the Florida coast.



It&#039;s been replaced with a more recent map which shows that there&#039;s a good wind resource off Florida&#039;s beaches.  (See comments below.)



Hurricanes are an issue, they are an issue with all wind farms off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.  The cost of insurance will be higher.  We&#039;ll have to wait to see how that adds to the cost of electricity.


The US doesn&#039;t get hit by many hurricanes that are Category 3 or higher.  Currently wind turbines are designed to withstand Category 2 hurricanes.  By spreading turbines along thousands of miles of coastal area it will be the case that only a small percentage would get damaged in a major storm which would spread the cost of insurance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an earlier wind map in the article which was very incomplete.   It showed no harvestable wind off the Florida coast.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been replaced with a more recent map which shows that there&#8217;s a good wind resource off Florida&#8217;s beaches.  (See comments below.)</p>
<p>Hurricanes are an issue, they are an issue with all wind farms off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.  The cost of insurance will be higher.  We&#8217;ll have to wait to see how that adds to the cost of electricity.</p>
<p>The US doesn&#8217;t get hit by many hurricanes that are Category 3 or higher.  Currently wind turbines are designed to withstand Category 2 hurricanes.  By spreading turbines along thousands of miles of coastal area it will be the case that only a small percentage would get damaged in a major storm which would spread the cost of insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Florida precluded due to it being a hurricane zone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Florida precluded due to it being a hurricane zone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much better.  Thanks.


(I took down your incomplete post.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better.  Thanks.</p>
<p>(I took down your incomplete post.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please stop using the old map for offshore wind - it causes folks to think there&#039;s no offshore wind potential in Florida. Here&#039;s a better map: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/images/wind_speed_map_lg.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop using the old map for offshore wind &#8211; it causes folks to think there&#8217;s no offshore wind potential in Florida. Here&#8217;s a better map: <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/images/wind_speed_map_lg.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/images/wind_speed_map_lg.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-190256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-190256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please stop]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-189966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-189966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try this one.  Click to greater it.  



It show locations, but under reports wind.  It&#039;s a 50 meter altitude map and resources are much better at 80 meter.


The stuff offshore Florida is as good as the onshore Midwestern wind we&#039;re now using.


Deep water calls for floating turbine.  Japan now has two in the water and we&#039;ve got a prototype in the water in Maine.  Still at the stage of figuring out the best platform design.  A West Coast test site is opening at Coos Bay, OR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this one.  Click to greater it.  </p>
<p>It show locations, but under reports wind.  It&#8217;s a 50 meter altitude map and resources are much better at 80 meter.</p>
<p>The stuff offshore Florida is as good as the onshore Midwestern wind we&#8217;re now using.</p>
<p>Deep water calls for floating turbine.  Japan now has two in the water and we&#8217;ve got a prototype in the water in Maine.  Still at the stage of figuring out the best platform design.  A West Coast test site is opening at Coos Bay, OR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-189942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-189942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Higher resolution figures would be nice.  Also, the narrative associated with the 1st chart seems to imply the figure only includes offshore areas with water depths less than 100 ft, but for most of California and Hawaii the ocean isn&#039;t that shallow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Higher resolution figures would be nice.  Also, the narrative associated with the 1st chart seems to imply the figure only includes offshore areas with water depths less than 100 ft, but for most of California and Hawaii the ocean isn&#8217;t that shallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-189941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-189941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea.  Its like the wind doesn&#039;t blow there?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea.  Its like the wind doesn&#8217;t blow there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Williamson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-189903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Williamson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-189903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that it is very interesting that Florida has no ranking....Is that because of state policies?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is very interesting that Florida has no ranking&#8230;.Is that because of state policies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/11/01/offshore-wind-much-potential-ignore/#comment-189618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=58501#comment-189618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me quote Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms_in_the_United_States): 
&quot;As of 2013, there are no offshore wind farms in the United States.&quot;
There aren&#039;t any under construction either.
Given the long lead times and large scale of offshore wind projects, policy uncertainty is crippling the sector.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me quote Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms_in_the_United_States):<br />
&#8220;As of 2013, there are no offshore wind farms in the United States.&#8221;<br />
There aren&#8217;t any under construction either.<br />
Given the long lead times and large scale of offshore wind projects, policy uncertainty is crippling the sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
