<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Are The Big 5 In The Carbon Trade?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/31/who-are-the-big-5-in-the-carbon-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/31/who-are-the-big-5-in-the-carbon-trade/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 03:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter Siegers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/31/who-are-the-big-5-in-the-carbon-trade/#comment-179836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pieter Siegers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55852#comment-179836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the interesting information.
I think that the world could do itself a big favor reducing the amount of carbon that moves arround, because it is obvious that to move carbon around it takes carbon combustion and therefore increased CO2 which we don&#039;t want.
What I miss is more relevant data, as I understand the data is until 2007, now we&#039;re six years later and I guess much has changed...??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting information.<br />
I think that the world could do itself a big favor reducing the amount of carbon that moves arround, because it is obvious that to move carbon around it takes carbon combustion and therefore increased CO2 which we don&#8217;t want.<br />
What I miss is more relevant data, as I understand the data is until 2007, now we&#8217;re six years later and I guess much has changed&#8230;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
