<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican &amp; Democrat In House Push For More Renewable Energy Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/republican-democrat-in-house-push-for-more-renewable-energy-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/republican-democrat-in-house-push-for-more-renewable-energy-support/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/28/republican-democrat-in-house-push-for-more-renewable-energy-support/#comment-178996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55764#comment-178996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#039;m glad someone stood up. Its was only 65 of 435 (15%). And it just signing a letter not voting. From a national defense stand point we should be pushing for:
- 50% of electric green by 2020. I&#039;ll even let big hydro in that very low goal.
- Complete cut of oil/gas/coal support (ask stated International agreements)
- Drop nuclear support also
Now if they were smart they would also add a GHG (based on use) fee, plus a triple the amount on any fuel exported. Funds from this would go:
- 50% to cash credit to each tax payer, yes you have to file sorry.
- 25% for PV, heat pumps, and efficiency improvements to public buildings.
- 25% for deployment of new items. Example, micro grid, grid storage, PV quick charge, etc.


For the export fee, you take the lower 50% efficient US industry would have paid if they used that fuel (GHG fee) and triple it. And yes, part of the GHG fee would be on petro for your car/truck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m glad someone stood up. Its was only 65 of 435 (15%). And it just signing a letter not voting. From a national defense stand point we should be pushing for:<br />
&#8211; 50% of electric green by 2020. I&#8217;ll even let big hydro in that very low goal.<br />
&#8211; Complete cut of oil/gas/coal support (ask stated International agreements)<br />
&#8211; Drop nuclear support also<br />
Now if they were smart they would also add a GHG (based on use) fee, plus a triple the amount on any fuel exported. Funds from this would go:<br />
&#8211; 50% to cash credit to each tax payer, yes you have to file sorry.<br />
&#8211; 25% for PV, heat pumps, and efficiency improvements to public buildings.<br />
&#8211; 25% for deployment of new items. Example, micro grid, grid storage, PV quick charge, etc.</p>
<p>For the export fee, you take the lower 50% efficient US industry would have paid if they used that fuel (GHG fee) and triple it. And yes, part of the GHG fee would be on petro for your car/truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
