<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pair Of 44 MPG Range Rover Hybrids Debut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/pair-of-44-mpg-range-rover-hybrids-debut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/pair-of-44-mpg-range-rover-hybrids-debut/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff May</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/27/pair-of-44-mpg-range-rover-hybrids-debut/#comment-178786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff May]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55617#comment-178786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is way off.  The &quot;44 mpg&quot; is based on Imperial gallons (it&#039;s only 36.6mpg US) and European fuel economy tests.  

It&#039;s not even remotely comparable to US mpg ratings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is way off.  The &#8220;44 mpg&#8221; is based on Imperial gallons (it&#8217;s only 36.6mpg US) and European fuel economy tests.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not even remotely comparable to US mpg ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
