<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesla Model S Firmware Update Brings Improved Sleep Mode, Improved Creep, Tow Mode, &amp; More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/tesla-model-s-firmware-update-brings-improved-sleep-mode-improved-creep-tow-mode-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/tesla-model-s-firmware-update-brings-improved-sleep-mode-improved-creep-tow-mode-etc/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Meads</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/tesla-model-s-firmware-update-brings-improved-sleep-mode-improved-creep-tow-mode-etc/#comment-177503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion Meads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55297#comment-177503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The update is indeed a compromise. Tesla or the Tesla fans have defended that the next firmware update should reduce the losses by 99%, here we have 50%-70% reduction. It is a significant reduction, but what remains is still significantly big. Instead of bleeding 4.5 kWh/day, we are now bleeding 2.25 kWh/day! 



And now there is a 10-second delay. Let us not have some amnesia here. If I remember correctly, the first attempts at fixing the vampire losses resulted in also a  boot-up delay, and the Tesla owners didn&#039;t like it, so Tesla recalled the updates. And now it seems to me that this is the same type of firmware update with the delay is reintroduced again.  Why don&#039;t they have the instant boot-up technology for their on-board computers?  Extra high price demands extraordinary performance and extraordinary efficiency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The update is indeed a compromise. Tesla or the Tesla fans have defended that the next firmware update should reduce the losses by 99%, here we have 50%-70% reduction. It is a significant reduction, but what remains is still significantly big. Instead of bleeding 4.5 kWh/day, we are now bleeding 2.25 kWh/day! </p>
<p>And now there is a 10-second delay. Let us not have some amnesia here. If I remember correctly, the first attempts at fixing the vampire losses resulted in also a  boot-up delay, and the Tesla owners didn&#8217;t like it, so Tesla recalled the updates. And now it seems to me that this is the same type of firmware update with the delay is reintroduced again.  Why don&#8217;t they have the instant boot-up technology for their on-board computers?  Extra high price demands extraordinary performance and extraordinary efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
