<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ecological Deficit 2013 Is Starting&#8230; Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/#comment-180160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55344#comment-180160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our ancestors are going to love us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our ancestors are going to love us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Kerr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/#comment-177672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Kerr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55344#comment-177672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might also note that such land would not be decimated, say like the land in Alberta where we are exploiting that low grade bitumen. If things were to change in the future (and they surly will) that land cold easily be reconfigured for other uses. CSP seems to be the way to go!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might also note that such land would not be decimated, say like the land in Alberta where we are exploiting that low grade bitumen. If things were to change in the future (and they surly will) that land cold easily be reconfigured for other uses. CSP seems to be the way to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeple</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/#comment-177610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55344#comment-177610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, a graph with actually no apparent science whatsoever to support it. Novel approach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a graph with actually no apparent science whatsoever to support it. Novel approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/#comment-177565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55344#comment-177565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. I wonder what would be the ecological deficit crossover date if the U.S. had 100% renewable energy penetration in the electrical grid AND most of our vehicles were EVs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I wonder what would be the ecological deficit crossover date if the U.S. had 100% renewable energy penetration in the electrical grid AND most of our vehicles were EVs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/#comment-177564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55344#comment-177564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read this and believe Cleantechnica might want to do a story on it so I&#039;m passing it on to you:

&quot;
August 14, 2013

NREL Analyzes Solar Energy Land-Use Requirements

The Energy Department’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has published a report on the land use requirements of solar power plants based on land-use practices from existing solar facilities. The report, “Land-use Requirements for Solar Power Plants in the United States,” gathered data from 72% of the solar power plants currently installed or under construction in the United States.

Among the findings were that a large, fixed-tilt photovoltaic (PV) plant that generates 1 gigawatt-hour per year requires an average of 2.8 acres for the solar panels. This means that a solar power plant that provides electricity for 1,000 homes would require 32 acres of land. 

Also, small single-axis PV systems require on average 2.9 acres per annual gigawatt-hour, or 3.8 acres when considering all unused area that falls inside the project boundary. 

And finally, concentrating solar power plants require on average 2.7 acres per annual gigawatt-hour for solar collectors and other equipment, or 3.5 acres when considering all land enclosed within the project boundary.

By the third quarter of 2012, the United States had deployed more than 2.1 gigawatts of utility-scale solar power generation capacity, with another 4.6 gigawatts under construction. 
 
A previous NREL report, “Land-use Requirements and the Per-capita Solar Footprint for Photovoltaic Generation in the United States,” had estimated that if solar energy was to meet 100% of all electricity demand in the United States, it would take up 0.6% of the total area in the United States. 

For the newer report, the data come not from estimates or calculations, but from compiling land use numbers from actual solar power plants. See the NREL press release and  complete report.&quot;

http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=19506]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this and believe Cleantechnica might want to do a story on it so I&#8217;m passing it on to you:</p>
<p>&#8221;<br />
August 14, 2013</p>
<p>NREL Analyzes Solar Energy Land-Use Requirements</p>
<p>The Energy Department’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has published a report on the land use requirements of solar power plants based on land-use practices from existing solar facilities. The report, “Land-use Requirements for Solar Power Plants in the United States,” gathered data from 72% of the solar power plants currently installed or under construction in the United States.</p>
<p>Among the findings were that a large, fixed-tilt photovoltaic (PV) plant that generates 1 gigawatt-hour per year requires an average of 2.8 acres for the solar panels. This means that a solar power plant that provides electricity for 1,000 homes would require 32 acres of land. </p>
<p>Also, small single-axis PV systems require on average 2.9 acres per annual gigawatt-hour, or 3.8 acres when considering all unused area that falls inside the project boundary. </p>
<p>And finally, concentrating solar power plants require on average 2.7 acres per annual gigawatt-hour for solar collectors and other equipment, or 3.5 acres when considering all land enclosed within the project boundary.</p>
<p>By the third quarter of 2012, the United States had deployed more than 2.1 gigawatts of utility-scale solar power generation capacity, with another 4.6 gigawatts under construction. </p>
<p>A previous NREL report, “Land-use Requirements and the Per-capita Solar Footprint for Photovoltaic Generation in the United States,” had estimated that if solar energy was to meet 100% of all electricity demand in the United States, it would take up 0.6% of the total area in the United States. </p>
<p>For the newer report, the data come not from estimates or calculations, but from compiling land use numbers from actual solar power plants. See the NREL press release and  complete report.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=19506" rel="nofollow">http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=19506</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_JamesM</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/20/ecological-deficit-2013-is-starting-now/#comment-177547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J_JamesM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55344#comment-177547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually it takes something drastic to happen before significant action is taken- for example, an ecosystem collapsing which causes an entire industry to capsize. If any of the species are left, usually we are able to muster enough support to protect and breed them back a bit. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually it takes something drastic to happen before significant action is taken- for example, an ecosystem collapsing which causes an entire industry to capsize. If any of the species are left, usually we are able to muster enough support to protect and breed them back a bit. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
