<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting Renewables Could Increase Electricity Bills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/13/cutting-renewables-could-increase-electricity-bills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/13/cutting-renewables-could-increase-electricity-bills/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 06:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/13/cutting-renewables-could-increase-electricity-bills/#comment-177099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55030#comment-177099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert,
Read this one:
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/14/iowa-will-add-1-06gw-new-wind-energy-capacity-by-2015/
It is a real world example that refutes what you are saying.  Wind is reducing the cost of electricity in Iowa.  They were so unhappy with 20% of their electricity coming from wind that they apparently now have 25%.  They are so unhappy with this they are working to build more.  The latst being the articles subject.  If I remember correctly, they have a republican congressional rep who is pro-wind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
Read this one:<br />
<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/14/iowa-will-add-1-06gw-new-wind-energy-capacity-by-2015/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/14/iowa-will-add-1-06gw-new-wind-energy-capacity-by-2015/</a><br />
It is a real world example that refutes what you are saying.  Wind is reducing the cost of electricity in Iowa.  They were so unhappy with 20% of their electricity coming from wind that they apparently now have 25%.  They are so unhappy with this they are working to build more.  The latst being the articles subject.  If I remember correctly, they have a republican congressional rep who is pro-wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/13/cutting-renewables-could-increase-electricity-bills/#comment-176828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55030#comment-176828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s an insidious plot by the fat algore to steal your precious gold and manhood Robert.  



Would you like to engage in constructive conversation about how we best get off fossil fuels or would you like to go elsewhere?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an insidious plot by the fat algore to steal your precious gold and manhood Robert.  </p>
<p>Would you like to engage in constructive conversation about how we best get off fossil fuels or would you like to go elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/13/cutting-renewables-could-increase-electricity-bills/#comment-176793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55030#comment-176793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why has the cost for power gone up and up since the introduction of 

Renewables; would it be not logic that the cost should it least remain the same or go down? I don&#039;t understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has the cost for power gone up and up since the introduction of </p>
<p>Renewables; would it be not logic that the cost should it least remain the same or go down? I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/13/cutting-renewables-could-increase-electricity-bills/#comment-176595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=55030#comment-176595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;.. the federal Coalition, which has agreed to force another review of the RET to investigate those claims.&quot; The Coalition is currently the opposition in Canberra, not the government.  They can only cut back the RET if they win the September election against Rudd&#039;s Labour and the Greens - probable but not a sure thing. One Aussie betting site gives the odds at 5:1. Rudd is a more skilled politician than Abbott and he&#039;s not Julia Gillard, so he has a chance to hold on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;.. the federal Coalition, which has agreed to force another review of the RET to investigate those claims.&#8221; The Coalition is currently the opposition in Canberra, not the government.  They can only cut back the RET if they win the September election against Rudd&#8217;s Labour and the Greens &#8211; probable but not a sure thing. One Aussie betting site gives the odds at 5:1. Rudd is a more skilled politician than Abbott and he&#8217;s not Julia Gillard, so he has a chance to hold on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
