<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesla Truck Rendering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaxEmLike1938</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/#comment-180772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TaxEmLike1938]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54733#comment-180772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve had 5 Ford Rangers in my life. I&#039;d love to see a Tesla truck, similar to my Ford Rangers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had 5 Ford Rangers in my life. I&#8217;d love to see a Tesla truck, similar to my Ford Rangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiggity</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/#comment-175353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiggity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54733#comment-175353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please delete that picture, forever.  I know you meant well, but get rid of that picture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please delete that picture, forever.  I know you meant well, but get rid of that picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jago</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/#comment-175341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Jago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54733#comment-175341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make it look more like this:  www.holden.com.au/worldrecordute.



Much better!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make it look more like this:  <a href="http://www.holden.com.au/worldrecordute" rel="nofollow">http://www.holden.com.au/worldrecordute</a>.</p>
<p>Much better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_JamesM</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/#comment-175328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J_JamesM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54733#comment-175328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh, that thing reminds me of an ugly subaru half-truck or one of those horrendous economy car pseudo-trucks from the 1980s. It would be better to just slap an electric drivetrain conversion in an actual El Camino than compare that to it.

But I&#039;m not at all opposed to the concept of an electric truck, however. Obviously, they would need to have a whole lot more ground clearance than that, as well as seriously puncture-proof batteries and a doubly-reinforced undercarriage plate. The modified suspension seems totally doable.

The biggest draw, by far, would be the unprecedented and instantaneous torque an electric motor could provide. I could easily see it having an F-350-like arrangement of four rear wheels just for the increased traction they provide. Paired with an asymmetrical dual-motor drivetrain and motors specifically designed with high torque similar to the Chevy Spark&#039;s, I can see it easily eclipsing 1,500 total pounds-feet of torque. That&#039;s about four times as much torque as a F-750 commercial construction truck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, that thing reminds me of an ugly subaru half-truck or one of those horrendous economy car pseudo-trucks from the 1980s. It would be better to just slap an electric drivetrain conversion in an actual El Camino than compare that to it.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not at all opposed to the concept of an electric truck, however. Obviously, they would need to have a whole lot more ground clearance than that, as well as seriously puncture-proof batteries and a doubly-reinforced undercarriage plate. The modified suspension seems totally doable.</p>
<p>The biggest draw, by far, would be the unprecedented and instantaneous torque an electric motor could provide. I could easily see it having an F-350-like arrangement of four rear wheels just for the increased traction they provide. Paired with an asymmetrical dual-motor drivetrain and motors specifically designed with high torque similar to the Chevy Spark&#8217;s, I can see it easily eclipsing 1,500 total pounds-feet of torque. That&#8217;s about four times as much torque as a F-750 commercial construction truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bussdriver78</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/05/tesla-truck-rendering/#comment-175322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bussdriver78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54733#comment-175322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[waste of time. don&#039;t do articles like this - just have less articles instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waste of time. don&#8217;t do articles like this &#8211; just have less articles instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
