<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesla Stock Undervalued According To Deutsche Bank &#8212; Could Reach $160 Within The Next Few Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/tesla-stock-undervalued-according-to-deutsche-bank-could-reach-160-within-the-next-few-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/tesla-stock-undervalued-according-to-deutsche-bank-could-reach-160-within-the-next-few-years/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 17:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jouni Valkonen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/tesla-stock-undervalued-according-to-deutsche-bank-could-reach-160-within-the-next-few-years/#comment-174636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jouni Valkonen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54524#comment-174636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tesla is clear market leader in technology. See e.g. Model S comparison to pathetic BMW i3 — the best thing what big auto manufactures are managed to put together:

&lt;b&gt;BMW&#039;s i3 electric car is no threat to Tesla Model S&lt;/b&gt;
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1587462-bmws-i3-electric-car-is-no-threat-to-teslas-model-s

It is curious that the evolution of Tesla Stock is depended on the evolution on EV battery technology. Right now battery technology is following so called Moore&#039;s Law i.e. rapid exponential cost/performance improvements, but the interesting feature is that Moore&#039;s Law predicts that the cost of EV battery will eventually go to near zero (i.e. to negligible). 

Then who dares to put their money on the kurzweilian future? Therefore Tesla&#039;s stock is grossly undervalued still after triple digit surge. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tesla is clear market leader in technology. See e.g. Model S comparison to pathetic BMW i3 — the best thing what big auto manufactures are managed to put together:</p>
<p><b>BMW&#8217;s i3 electric car is no threat to Tesla Model S</b><br />
<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/1587462-bmws-i3-electric-car-is-no-threat-to-teslas-model-s" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/1587462-bmws-i3-electric-car-is-no-threat-to-teslas-model-s</a></p>
<p>It is curious that the evolution of Tesla Stock is depended on the evolution on EV battery technology. Right now battery technology is following so called Moore&#8217;s Law i.e. rapid exponential cost/performance improvements, but the interesting feature is that Moore&#8217;s Law predicts that the cost of EV battery will eventually go to near zero (i.e. to negligible). </p>
<p>Then who dares to put their money on the kurzweilian future? Therefore Tesla&#8217;s stock is grossly undervalued still after triple digit surge. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/tesla-stock-undervalued-according-to-deutsche-bank-could-reach-160-within-the-next-few-years/#comment-174470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54524#comment-174470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Wow!&quot;  is a significant understatement.


I really wish they&#039;d put a timeline in that message.  If &quot;within 5 years&quot; had been included it would be getting close to time to sell oil stocks short and make a fortune.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wow!&#8221;  is a significant understatement.</p>
<p>I really wish they&#8217;d put a timeline in that message.  If &#8220;within 5 years&#8221; had been included it would be getting close to time to sell oil stocks short and make a fortune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aelwyn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/tesla-stock-undervalued-according-to-deutsche-bank-could-reach-160-within-the-next-few-years/#comment-174457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aelwyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54524#comment-174457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Based on proprietary work, we now expect the Gen3 vehicle to fully 
close the cost gap to non-EV competition with margins in the 25% range.&quot; Wow!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Based on proprietary work, we now expect the Gen3 vehicle to fully<br />
close the cost gap to non-EV competition with margins in the 25% range.&#8221; Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Meads</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/30/tesla-stock-undervalued-according-to-deutsche-bank-could-reach-160-within-the-next-few-years/#comment-174420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion Meads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54524#comment-174420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If many believe that it is undervalued, stock price will rise regardless...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If many believe that it is undervalued, stock price will rise regardless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
