<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electricity From CO2 &#8212; New Technique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Vermeer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/#comment-173790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Vermeer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54355#comment-173790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure this is a good idea... if I have understood the idea correctly, it means extracting the very energy that would have to be supplied for pulling down CO2 from the ambient air (as opposed to using power-plant smokestacks) in preparation for underground sequestration. Right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure this is a good idea&#8230; if I have understood the idea correctly, it means extracting the very energy that would have to be supplied for pulling down CO2 from the ambient air (as opposed to using power-plant smokestacks) in preparation for underground sequestration. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brakels</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/#comment-173753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brakels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54355#comment-173753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 4.5 mW a square meter it would take about half a million square meters of surface area to collect enough wattage to run the heating element in my oven.  Think I&#039;ll stick to solar cells.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 4.5 mW a square meter it would take about half a million square meters of surface area to collect enough wattage to run the heating element in my oven.  Think I&#8217;ll stick to solar cells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/#comment-173686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54355#comment-173686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, all these schemes to use the concentrated CO2 stream from fossil fuel plants will make it harder to close those plants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, all these schemes to use the concentrated CO2 stream from fossil fuel plants will make it harder to close those plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/#comment-173681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54355#comment-173681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the technology helpful? It would make fossil-burning power stations more efficient overall, and reduce the CO2 per kwh of fossil electricity. On the other hand, it will prolong their economic life and slow down the clean energy transition. Development is not a priority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the technology helpful? It would make fossil-burning power stations more efficient overall, and reduce the CO2 per kwh of fossil electricity. On the other hand, it will prolong their economic life and slow down the clean energy transition. Development is not a priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Meads</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/26/electricity-from-co2-new-technique/#comment-173675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion Meads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54355#comment-173675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They have calculated an energy efficiency of 24% to 32%. What is the basis of this efficiency?  Clearly we know the output is electricity, and it is 24% of what input energy?  What is the input or the main energy source?  Has the energy costs for pumping water and bubbling the air also been accounted for?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have calculated an energy efficiency of 24% to 32%. What is the basis of this efficiency?  Clearly we know the output is electricity, and it is 24% of what input energy?  What is the input or the main energy source?  Has the energy costs for pumping water and bubbling the air also been accounted for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
