<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virginia&#8217;s Coastline Could Soon Be Home To 2 GW Of Offshore Wind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 06:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamil Ayntrazi</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-187675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shamil Ayntrazi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-187675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings,

The
Coordinated Offshore Energy
Extraction, Floating Wind Turbine Foundations and Bridges (COEE &amp; FB) extract
offshore renewable energy; Wave, Tidal, Wind and Solar.  The COEE construction unit is a building
block for offshore wind farms, wind turbine floating foundations and Floating
Bridges.

The Floating Bridge provides Floating Foundations
support for offshore wind turbine farms and support for electric power and
control cables to the shoreline and for maintenance.

The Floating Bridge is used for access to
oil/gas rigs and for support of oil/gas pipelines, electric power and control
cables to the shoreline.

The Floating Bridge provides access to and
between islands, across rivers, at reservoirs behind dams, for offshore wind
turbine farms; for transport, installation and maintenance.

The system accepts standard wind turbines as
provided by others. The wind turbine support being modified to fix to the
floating wind turbine structure. 

OUTPUT

a.   
A coee construction unit measuring
16.5x12.5 meters can provide energy output per year per meter of sea front in
excess of the following depending on sea and wind states: 

                                     
i.       
Wave energy                                    45,503 KW-H

                                   
ii.       
Tidal energy                                        6,636 KW-H

                                  
iii.       
Solar Energy, 200 sqm                   10,910 KW-H

Total per meter sea
front                 63,089 KW-H            

                                                Wind Turbine Rating                        Output KW-H            Total KW-H

a.   
0.75 MW W. Turbine            31,250 KW-H              94,339

b.   
1 MW W. Turbine                 28,571 KW-H              91,660

c.   
3 MW W. Turbine                 64,286 KW-H            127,375

d.   
7 MW W. Turbine             123,529 KW-H  186,618

e.   
10 MW W. Turbine           142,587 KW-H  205,675

b.   
For a sale price of 10 US cents per
KW-H would provide a minimum rate of return on capital investment – ROI way
above 12% excluding government incentives, tax breaks and bridge toll where the
floating bridge is used for vehicular transport. 

It is worth for Clients and Consultants to
request an Alternate Bid based on the Coordinated Offshore Energy Extraction and Floating Wind
Turbine Foundations and Bridges.  This
way they will have a real estimate and an estimate of KW-Hours produced per
year.

The
COEE and FB system does not require R&amp;D neither Prototype testing.  The engineering calculations can be easily
developed and verified, and all equipment are available on the market with
proven performance records.

 

Email: sayntrazi@hotmail.com

Website: www.renewableenergypumps.com 

15496 Village
Woods Drive,

Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, MN 55347, USA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>The<br />
Coordinated Offshore Energy<br />
Extraction, Floating Wind Turbine Foundations and Bridges (COEE &amp; FB) extract<br />
offshore renewable energy; Wave, Tidal, Wind and Solar.  The COEE construction unit is a building<br />
block for offshore wind farms, wind turbine floating foundations and Floating<br />
Bridges.</p>
<p>The Floating Bridge provides Floating Foundations<br />
support for offshore wind turbine farms and support for electric power and<br />
control cables to the shoreline and for maintenance.</p>
<p>The Floating Bridge is used for access to<br />
oil/gas rigs and for support of oil/gas pipelines, electric power and control<br />
cables to the shoreline.</p>
<p>The Floating Bridge provides access to and<br />
between islands, across rivers, at reservoirs behind dams, for offshore wind<br />
turbine farms; for transport, installation and maintenance.</p>
<p>The system accepts standard wind turbines as<br />
provided by others. The wind turbine support being modified to fix to the<br />
floating wind turbine structure. </p>
<p>OUTPUT</p>
<p>a.<br />
A coee construction unit measuring<br />
16.5&#215;12.5 meters can provide energy output per year per meter of sea front in<br />
excess of the following depending on sea and wind states: </p>
<p>i.<br />
Wave energy                                    45,503 KW-H</p>
<p>ii.<br />
Tidal energy                                        6,636 KW-H</p>
<p>iii.<br />
Solar Energy, 200 sqm                   10,910 KW-H</p>
<p>Total per meter sea<br />
front                 63,089 KW-H            </p>
<p>                                                Wind Turbine Rating                        Output KW-H            Total KW-H</p>
<p>a.<br />
0.75 MW W. Turbine            31,250 KW-H              94,339</p>
<p>b.<br />
1 MW W. Turbine                 28,571 KW-H              91,660</p>
<p>c.<br />
3 MW W. Turbine                 64,286 KW-H            127,375</p>
<p>d.<br />
7 MW W. Turbine             123,529 KW-H  186,618</p>
<p>e.<br />
10 MW W. Turbine           142,587 KW-H  205,675</p>
<p>b.<br />
For a sale price of 10 US cents per<br />
KW-H would provide a minimum rate of return on capital investment – ROI way<br />
above 12% excluding government incentives, tax breaks and bridge toll where the<br />
floating bridge is used for vehicular transport. </p>
<p>It is worth for Clients and Consultants to<br />
request an Alternate Bid based on the Coordinated Offshore Energy Extraction and Floating Wind<br />
Turbine Foundations and Bridges.  This<br />
way they will have a real estimate and an estimate of KW-Hours produced per<br />
year.</p>
<p>The<br />
COEE and FB system does not require R&amp;D neither Prototype testing.  The engineering calculations can be easily<br />
developed and verified, and all equipment are available on the market with<br />
proven performance records.</p>
<p>Email: <a href="mailto:sayntrazi@hotmail.com">sayntrazi@hotmail.com</a></p>
<p>Website: <a href="http://www.renewableenergypumps.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.renewableenergypumps.com</a> </p>
<p>15496 Village<br />
Woods Drive,</p>
<p>Eden Prairie,<br />
Minnesota, MN 55347, USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, please update. While &quot;m&quot;, &quot;b&quot; and &quot;t&quot; are only one letter off; it&#039;s a very big impact on the number . ;)

Of course if someone wanted to build a reef in the area, using the extra electric when there is &quot;too much&quot; would make it easier. There has been several studies (in 70&#039;s I think) that used electric passed through metal mesh to start a reef. Once the base is in place, mother takes over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, please update. While &#8220;m&#8221;, &#8220;b&#8221; and &#8220;t&#8221; are only one letter off; it&#8217;s a very big impact on the number . <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>Of course if someone wanted to build a reef in the area, using the extra electric when there is &#8220;too much&#8221; would make it easier. There has been several studies (in 70&#8217;s I think) that used electric passed through metal mesh to start a reef. Once the base is in place, mother takes over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I said &quot;serve as artificial reef&quot;  I did not say that the pilings would function like a &quot;true coral reef&quot;.   I did not say that the underwater structures would be the bestest reef in entire great big world.



Lighten up a little.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said &#8220;serve as artificial reef&#8221;  I did not say that the pilings would function like a &#8220;true coral reef&#8221;.   I did not say that the underwater structures would be the bestest reef in entire great big world.</p>
<p>Lighten up a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article.  You should correct the following, though:

&quot;...we’re rapidly losing the opportunity to lead in a market estimated to be worth around $170 million by 2020.&quot;



It&#039;s expected to be $170 billion, not $ 170 million.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  You should correct the following, though:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;we’re rapidly losing the opportunity to lead in a market estimated to be worth around $170 million by 2020.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s expected to be $170 billion, not $ 170 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check some concrete dock pilings sometime.  Marine life finds them quite attractive.  



As for total area.  A few hundred square feet is more than none.  Fishing is excellent around oil rigs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check some concrete dock pilings sometime.  Marine life finds them quite attractive.  </p>
<p>As for total area.  A few hundred square feet is more than none.  Fishing is excellent around oil rigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dongenergy.com/EN/responsibility/Cases/Pages/case_story.aspx?caseid=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;build the reefs&lt;/a&gt; (which you may need to protect the  bases from scouring currents). Preferably out of irregular natural rocks, and at best ones you&#039;ve displaced in the project. The smooth concrete bases of the towers don&#039;t provide enough surface area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to <a href="https://www.dongenergy.com/EN/responsibility/Cases/Pages/case_story.aspx?caseid=1" rel="nofollow">build the reefs</a> (which you may need to protect the  bases from scouring currents). Preferably out of irregular natural rocks, and at best ones you&#8217;ve displaced in the project. The smooth concrete bases of the towers don&#8217;t provide enough surface area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Virginia does not maintain a competitive electricity market&quot;


Virginia, that bastion of Republicanism, does not believe in the free market?


They practice energy socialism?  Like the very red state of Georgia?



I feel a spell of the vapors coming on....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Virginia does not maintain a competitive electricity market&#8221;</p>
<p>Virginia, that bastion of Republicanism, does not believe in the free market?</p>
<p>They practice energy socialism?  Like the very red state of Georgia?</p>
<p>I feel a spell of the vapors coming on&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protected zones also let fish grow larger.  Larger fish produce more offspring.  



Additionally the underwater parts of wind farms serve as artificial reefs.  That provides habitat for organisms and plants which need to attach themselves to something.  And that adds food at the bottom of the food chain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Protected zones also let fish grow larger.  Larger fish produce more offspring.  </p>
<p>Additionally the underwater parts of wind farms serve as artificial reefs.  That provides habitat for organisms and plants which need to attach themselves to something.  And that adds food at the bottom of the food chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS: the zone auctioned includes a fish haven. Since industrial fishing - especially trawling  - is incompatible with wind farms, the proposal is likely to &lt;a&gt;expand the effective haven&lt;/a&gt;: up to 20 times if the whole block is fully developed. Good news, as complete no-fishing zones where fish can breed without interference are the best protection yet invented against overfishing. In the medium run they can raise sustainable catches elsewhere as the fish have to spill out of the protected zone in search of food..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: the zone auctioned includes a fish haven. Since industrial fishing &#8211; especially trawling  &#8211; is incompatible with wind farms, the proposal is likely to <a>expand the effective haven</a>: up to 20 times if the whole block is fully developed. Good news, as complete no-fishing zones where fish can breed without interference are the best protection yet invented against overfishing. In the medium run they can raise sustainable catches elsewhere as the fish have to spill out of the protected zone in search of food..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/24/virginia-coastline-could-soon-be-generating-2gw-of-offshore-wind/#comment-173411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=54328#comment-173411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Full disclosure – I am a Dominion residential electricity customer.&quot; How is that a potential conflict of interest, unless you are suing them or vice versa? Are you going to tell us whether you typed the post on a Mac or an Ultrabook? In theory you might be biased against Dominion winning the lease, because you think they will make a costly mess of it and then hike your tariff to compensate. Believe me, your readers here have other risks on their minds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Full disclosure – I am a Dominion residential electricity customer.&#8221; How is that a potential conflict of interest, unless you are suing them or vice versa? Are you going to tell us whether you typed the post on a Mac or an Ultrabook? In theory you might be biased against Dominion winning the lease, because you think they will make a costly mess of it and then hike your tariff to compensate. Believe me, your readers here have other risks on their minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
