<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU Parliament Approves Backloading Fix To Cap And Trade Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/03/eu-parliament-approves-backloading-fix-to-cap-and-trade-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/03/eu-parliament-approves-backloading-fix-to-cap-and-trade-market/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/03/eu-parliament-approves-backloading-fix-to-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-169689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53583#comment-169689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They took a small step, but kill the market in the end with &quot;assurances the move won’t be repeated&quot;. Should have just fixed it by dropping the 900 Million and then setting a minimum price, any time less then price close allowance drop by 10% (1 ton become 0.9 tons). And set a raising rate on minimum price. It is clear that the caps were set too high, and while the cleared away about 40% of the extra. It is still too high.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They took a small step, but kill the market in the end with &#8220;assurances the move won’t be repeated&#8221;. Should have just fixed it by dropping the 900 Million and then setting a minimum price, any time less then price close allowance drop by 10% (1 ton become 0.9 tons). And set a raising rate on minimum price. It is clear that the caps were set too high, and while the cleared away about 40% of the extra. It is still too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/03/eu-parliament-approves-backloading-fix-to-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-169658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53583#comment-169658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They really need to get this one over the line. It is an open goal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really need to get this one over the line. It is an open goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
