<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note To Google Reader Subscribers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/note-to-google-reader-subscribers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/note-to-google-reader-subscribers/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/note-to-google-reader-subscribers/#comment-168562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53345#comment-168562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My only two issues with it are:
- I can no longer highlight &amp; copy the titles from within Feedly.
- it seems to overwhelm my browser much faster than Reader did.
- there&#039;s no search function(!)
- it does seem to semi break from time to time (but i have to say that i&#039;m actually quite impressed with how well it has done in the midst of the massive Google Reader migration).


And Reader had issues of its own. Overall, I was happy enough with it to switch a few months early. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only two issues with it are:<br />
&#8211; I can no longer highlight &amp; copy the titles from within Feedly.<br />
&#8211; it seems to overwhelm my browser much faster than Reader did.<br />
&#8211; there&#8217;s no search function(!)<br />
&#8211; it does seem to semi break from time to time (but i have to say that i&#8217;m actually quite impressed with how well it has done in the midst of the massive Google Reader migration).</p>
<p>And Reader had issues of its own. Overall, I was happy enough with it to switch a few months early. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Herrick</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/27/note-to-google-reader-subscribers/#comment-168468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scot Herrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53345#comment-168468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I moved to Feedly early on and have been very happy with the service. They continually update the service and have put in a big hardware push to keep the service fast and active. And the one-click import from Google Reader is awesome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved to Feedly early on and have been very happy with the service. They continually update the service and have put in a big hardware push to keep the service fast and active. And the one-click import from Google Reader is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
