<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Development As ‘Sustainable Entrepreneurship’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/21/wind-development-as-sustainable-entrepreneurship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/21/wind-development-as-sustainable-entrepreneurship/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camp Creek</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/21/wind-development-as-sustainable-entrepreneurship/#comment-228817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camp Creek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53105#comment-228817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly, all of this is bunkum.  Tracy, Christine and Wasatch are not &quot;entrepreneurs.&quot;  They are de facto government agents, dependent on federal tax credits and state-level &quot;renewable portfolio standards,&quot; and on a government requirement that utilities purchase energy from so-called &quot;qualifying facilities.&quot;  And Wasatch &quot;games&quot; federal requirements to take advantage of that mandate, in some cases by declaring that a large, non-qualifying project is multiple small, &quot;qualifying facilities.&quot;  Tracy and Christine persist even when communities overwhelming oppose their project (in one Wyoming county, more than 70% of respondents to an all-households survey opposed a pending Wasatch deal).  There are many ways to reduce the carbon intensity of our cloves.  Wasatch-style state capitalism isn&#039;t it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, all of this is bunkum.  Tracy, Christine and Wasatch are not &#8220;entrepreneurs.&#8221;  They are de facto government agents, dependent on federal tax credits and state-level &#8220;renewable portfolio standards,&#8221; and on a government requirement that utilities purchase energy from so-called &#8220;qualifying facilities.&#8221;  And Wasatch &#8220;games&#8221; federal requirements to take advantage of that mandate, in some cases by declaring that a large, non-qualifying project is multiple small, &#8220;qualifying facilities.&#8221;  Tracy and Christine persist even when communities overwhelming oppose their project (in one Wyoming county, more than 70% of respondents to an all-households survey opposed a pending Wasatch deal).  There are many ways to reduce the carbon intensity of our cloves.  Wasatch-style state capitalism isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
