Comments on: New Electric Airplane Shown Off At Paris Air Show – Video

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:51:00 +0000

ha, you’ve got to be kidding. massive savings for people who go solar today: http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/17/how-much-solar-costs/

savings for many people who switch to EVs: http://evobsession.com/nissan-leaf-vs-nissan-rogue-cost-comparison/

Have you been asleep for the past 5 years? Or just reading the wrong stories?

By: agelbert

agelbert — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:19:00 +0000

You are welcome.

By: Ronald Brakels

Ronald Brakels — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:43:00 +0000

Vetxcl, so you know, you’re coming across as a little uncouth. I found Agelbert’s thoughts on the topic interesting and as the article mentions it is not a show plane or a stunt plane but intended for use as a trainer.

By: Ronald Brakels

Ronald Brakels — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:37:00 +0000

Thank you for your thoughts on this, Agelbert.

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:53:00 +0000

What is your problem? Reading with your eyes shut?

By: vetxcl

vetxcl — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:35:00 +0000

Not necessarily. Charging time IS a MORE significant factor – particularly when it CAN be capable of continuously charging – even at night.

Bet you thought you came up with a fatal flaw, didn’t you?

By: vetxcl

vetxcl — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:33:00 +0000

Oh, you ‘thought’. Ha!

By: vetxcl

vetxcl — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:32:00 +0000

It’s an air SHOW, not your opportunity to relate ALL of what you think is relative to the subject. So, there is NO need for an air SHOW plane to fly at night.

By: agelbert

agelbert — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:53:00 +0000

As a pilot with a little over 2,000 hours mostly on light twins, I can say this aircraft looks nice. As a trainer, it will have to be able to pull 4.4 positive and 2.2 negative Gs. There might be some cooling problems in the clear canopy so I hope they have adequate ventilation. I like the fact that there is electric drive on the wheel. It saves wear and tear on the main motors.
Here’s the thing about flying. Stalling speed is a function of weight so you want to keep the weight and wing loading down. Once you’ve accomplished that, if you can climb to about 10,000 feet, you can fly just about anywhere. The energy to climb is much more than that need to fly level. SO, if you have some fairly light, energy dense batteries, you can give the motors enough power in addition to the solar cells on the wings to get to altitude and then recharge the batteries. As long as you DON”T need the batteries for cruising flight, this baby could be a winner.
That said, I taught flying for a couple of years and a TRAINER aircraft has to take some pretty hard landings as well as a lot of different power settings and maneuvers involving climbs and descents as part of the average lesson. So this plane needs, perhaps, a slightly stronger landing gear as well as the ability to climb a thousand feet or so WITHOUT battery power. Finally, trainers must fly at night as well so, for those lessons, the flights probable will be limited to an hour or so for safety’s sake.
I wish them well. We need to get rid of the ICE EVERYWHERE, not just in cars, ships, factories and power plants.

By: Neil Blanchard

Neil Blanchard — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:20:00 +0000

Flight testing requires very strict protocols and it has to taxi before it flies – like it has to walk before it runs.

This is a really sleek looking airplane. I’ll bet it is very quiet while underway.

By: Ronald Brakels

Ronald Brakels — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:51:00 +0000

That’s interesting. In Australia power companies are pooping bricks because of the low cost of solar energy and the declining cost of energy storage while you’re pooping bricks because you think the advances aren’t brick pooping enough.

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:42:00 +0000

According to the company, one hour flight time. Or thirty minutes doing aerobatics.

Interesting to see these sorts of planes being developed. This is one place where increased battery capacity will take things from “interesting” to practical.

By: Glenn

Glenn — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:20:00 +0000

That’s It? Really??? I have been a “fan” of innovative, new, non petroleum fuel projects for years, but my support is waning because alternate energy “breakthroughs” have disappointed me again and again. Tesla, Leaf, volt, solar panels that are “affordable”. Stirling Solar electric generators, EEstore batteries. and the list goes on and on. It seems that they are all hype and lies. Show me the results and stop feeding the gullible public the bull.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:00:00 +0000

So . . . it taxis . . .

I thought that airplanes could fly.