<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 3% Solution Could Save US Businesses $780 Billion Within 10 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/20/the-3-solution-could-save-companies-and-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/20/the-3-solution-could-save-companies-and-environment/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/20/the-3-solution-could-save-companies-and-environment/#comment-167531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53040#comment-167531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.


Just try to get an &#039;overall energy tax weighted by pollution index&#039; past the Republican knuckleheads in Congress.  Perfect is un-doable.


If we fix our greenhouse emission problems it will mostly/most likely be done by finding ways for people make/save money by switching away from fossil fuels.


If you think we aren&#039;t getting anywhere then you aren&#039;t paying attention.


(I will not argue with you that we should be moving faster.  But I will point out that change generally starts slow and accelerates.  In all aspects of renewable energy we see acceleration occurring.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.</p>
<p>Just try to get an &#8216;overall energy tax weighted by pollution index&#8217; past the Republican knuckleheads in Congress.  Perfect is un-doable.</p>
<p>If we fix our greenhouse emission problems it will mostly/most likely be done by finding ways for people make/save money by switching away from fossil fuels.</p>
<p>If you think we aren&#8217;t getting anywhere then you aren&#8217;t paying attention.</p>
<p>(I will not argue with you that we should be moving faster.  But I will point out that change generally starts slow and accelerates.  In all aspects of renewable energy we see acceleration occurring.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter Siegers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/20/the-3-solution-could-save-companies-and-environment/#comment-167529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pieter Siegers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=53040#comment-167529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes me sick when people are looking at controlling climate change trying to make it a business. It should be clear by now that that approach is taking us nowhere. The better solution would be an overall energy tax weighed by pollution index, following a broad world-wide fair reorganization of energy subsidies. That, together with consumers demanding greener products will drive the so needed actions to revert climate change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes me sick when people are looking at controlling climate change trying to make it a business. It should be clear by now that that approach is taking us nowhere. The better solution would be an overall energy tax weighed by pollution index, following a broad world-wide fair reorganization of energy subsidies. That, together with consumers demanding greener products will drive the so needed actions to revert climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
